关于使用fs.readdir进行异步目录搜索有什么想法吗?我意识到我们可以引入递归,并调用read目录函数来读取下一个目录,但我有点担心它不是异步的…

什么好主意吗?我已经看了node-walk,它很棒,但它不能像readdir那样只给我数组中的文件。虽然

寻找这样的输出…

['file1.txt', 'file2.txt', 'dir/file3.txt']

当前回答

TypeScript中基于承诺的递归解决方案,使用Array.flat()处理嵌套返回。

import { resolve } from 'path'
import { Dirent } from 'fs'
import * as fs from 'fs'

function getFiles(root: string): Promise<string[]> {
 return fs.promises
   .readdir(root, { withFileTypes: true })
   .then(dirents => {
      const mapToPath = (r: string) => (dirent: Dirent): string => resolve(r, dirent.name)
      const directoryPaths = dirents.filter(a => a.isDirectory()).map(mapToPath(root))
      const filePaths = dirents.filter(a => a.isFile()).map(mapToPath(root))

     return Promise.all<string>([
       ...directoryPaths.map(a => getFiles(a, include)).flat(),
       ...filePaths.map(a => Promise.resolve(a))
     ]).then(a => a.flat())
  })
}

其他回答

为了好玩,这里有一个基于流的版本,它与highland.js streams库一起工作。作者之一是维克多·伍。

###
  directory >---m------> dirFilesStream >---------o----> out
                |                                 |
                |                                 |
                +--------< returnPipe <-----------+

  legend: (m)erge  (o)bserve

 + directory         has the initial file
 + dirListStream     does a directory listing
 + out               prints out the full path of the file
 + returnPipe        runs stat and filters on directories

###

_ = require('highland')
fs = require('fs')
fsPath = require('path')

directory = _(['someDirectory'])
mergePoint = _()
dirFilesStream = mergePoint.merge().flatMap((parentPath) ->
  _.wrapCallback(fs.readdir)(parentPath).sequence().map (path) ->
    fsPath.join parentPath, path
)
out = dirFilesStream
# Create the return pipe
returnPipe = dirFilesStream.observe().flatFilter((path) ->
  _.wrapCallback(fs.stat)(path).map (v) ->
    v.isDirectory()
)
# Connect up the merge point now that we have all of our streams.
mergePoint.write directory
mergePoint.write returnPipe
mergePoint.end()
# Release backpressure.  This will print files as they are discovered
out.each H.log
# Another way would be to queue them all up and then print them all out at once.
# out.toArray((files)-> console.log(files))

There are basically two ways of accomplishing this. In an async environment you'll notice that there are two kinds of loops: serial and parallel. A serial loop waits for one iteration to complete before it moves onto the next iteration - this guarantees that every iteration of the loop completes in order. In a parallel loop, all the iterations are started at the same time, and one may complete before another, however, it is much faster than a serial loop. So in this case, it's probably better to use a parallel loop because it doesn't matter what order the walk completes in, just as long as it completes and returns the results (unless you want them in order).

一个平行循环看起来是这样的:

var fs = require('fs');
var path = require('path');
var walk = function(dir, done) {
  var results = [];
  fs.readdir(dir, function(err, list) {
    if (err) return done(err);
    var pending = list.length;
    if (!pending) return done(null, results);
    list.forEach(function(file) {
      file = path.resolve(dir, file);
      fs.stat(file, function(err, stat) {
        if (stat && stat.isDirectory()) {
          walk(file, function(err, res) {
            results = results.concat(res);
            if (!--pending) done(null, results);
          });
        } else {
          results.push(file);
          if (!--pending) done(null, results);
        }
      });
    });
  });
};

一个串行循环看起来像这样:

var fs = require('fs');
var path = require('path');
var walk = function(dir, done) {
  var results = [];
  fs.readdir(dir, function(err, list) {
    if (err) return done(err);
    var i = 0;
    (function next() {
      var file = list[i++];
      if (!file) return done(null, results);
      file = path.resolve(dir, file);
      fs.stat(file, function(err, stat) {
        if (stat && stat.isDirectory()) {
          walk(file, function(err, res) {
            results = results.concat(res);
            next();
          });
        } else {
          results.push(file);
          next();
        }
      });
    })();
  });
};

并且在你的主目录中测试它(警告:如果你的主目录中有很多东西,结果列表将会非常大):

walk(process.env.HOME, function(err, results) {
  if (err) throw err;
  console.log(results);
});

编辑:改进的示例。

只是简单的散步

let pending = [baseFolderPath]
function walk () {
    pending.shift();
    // do stuffs width pending[0] and change pending items
    if (pending[0]) walk(pending[0])
}
walk(pending[0])

简单,基于异步承诺


const fs = require('fs/promises');
const getDirRecursive = async (dir) => {
    try {
        const items = await fs.readdir(dir);
        let files = [];
        for (const item of items) {
            if ((await fs.lstat(`${dir}/${item}`)).isDirectory()) files = [...files, ...(await getDirRecursive(`${dir}/${item}`))];
            else files.push({file: item, path: `${dir}/${item}`, parents: dir.split("/")});
        }
        return files;
    } catch (e) {
        return e
    }
};

用法:await getDirRecursive("./public");

看看装载机 https://npmjs.org/package/loaddir

npm无处不在

  loaddir = require('loaddir')

  allJavascripts = []
  loaddir({
    path: __dirname + '/public/javascripts',
    callback: function(){  allJavascripts.push(this.relativePath + this.baseName); }
  })

如果还需要扩展名,可以使用fileName而不是baseName。

一个额外的好处是,它也会监视文件,并再次调用回调。有大量的配置选项使它非常灵活。

我只是在短时间内用加载器从红宝石重造了守卫宝石