独立承诺实现

在这个例子中，我使用的是when.js承诺库。

var fs = require('fs')
, path = require('path')
, when = require('when')
, nodefn = require('when/node/function');

function walk (directory, includeDir) {
    var results = [];
    return when.map(nodefn.call(fs.readdir, directory), function(file) {
        file = path.join(directory, file);
        return nodefn.call(fs.stat, file).then(function(stat) {
            if (stat.isFile()) { return results.push(file); }
            if (includeDir) { results.push(file + path.sep); }
            return walk(file, includeDir).then(function(filesInDir) {
                results = results.concat(filesInDir);
            });
        });
    }).then(function() {
        return results;
    });
};

walk(__dirname).then(function(files) {
    console.log(files);
}).otherwise(function(error) {
    console.error(error.stack || error);
});

我包含了一个可选参数includeDir，如果设置为true，它将在文件列表中包含目录。

对于Node 10.3+，这里是一个For -await解决方案:

#!/usr/bin/env node

const FS = require('fs');
const Util = require('util');
const readDir = Util.promisify(FS.readdir);
const Path = require('path');

async function* readDirR(path) {
    const entries = await readDir(path,{withFileTypes:true});
    for(let entry of entries) {
        const fullPath = Path.join(path,entry.name);
        if(entry.isDirectory()) {
            yield* readDirR(fullPath);
        } else {
            yield fullPath;
        }
    }
}

async function main() {
    const start = process.hrtime.bigint();
    for await(const file of readDirR('/mnt/home/media/Unsorted')) {
        console.log(file);
    }
    console.log((process.hrtime.bigint()-start)/1000000n);
}

main().catch(err => {
    console.error(err);
});

这种解决方案的好处是，您可以立即开始处理结果;例如，读取媒体目录中的所有文件需要12秒，但如果我这样做，我可以在几毫秒内得到第一个结果。

因为每个人都应该写自己的，所以我写了一个。

步行(dir, cb, endCb) cb(文件) 零endCb (err |)

脏

module.exports = walk;

function walk(dir, cb, endCb) {
  var fs = require('fs');
  var path = require('path');

  fs.readdir(dir, function(err, files) {
    if (err) {
      return endCb(err);
    }

    var pending = files.length;
    if (pending === 0) {
      endCb(null);
    }
    files.forEach(function(file) {
      fs.stat(path.join(dir, file), function(err, stats) {
        if (err) {
          return endCb(err)
        }

        if (stats.isDirectory()) {
          walk(path.join(dir, file), cb, function() {
            pending--;
            if (pending === 0) {
              endCb(null);
            }
          });
        } else {
          cb(path.join(dir, file));
          pending--;
          if (pending === 0) {
            endCb(null);
          }
        }
      })
    });

  });
}

谁想要一个公认答案的同步替代方案(我知道我做过):

var fs = require('fs');
var path = require('path');
var walk = function(dir) {
    let results = [], err = null, list;
    try {
        list = fs.readdirSync(dir)
    } catch(e) {
        err = e.toString();
    }
    if (err) return err;
    var i = 0;
    return (function next() {
        var file = list[i++];

        if(!file) return results;
        file = path.resolve(dir, file);
        let stat = fs.statSync(file);
        if (stat && stat.isDirectory()) {
          let res = walk(file);
          results = results.concat(res);
          return next();
        } else {
          results.push(file);
           return next();
        }

    })();

};

console.log(
    walk("./")
)

我必须将基于promise的砂光器库添加到列表中。

 var sander = require('sander');
 sander.lsr(directory).then( filenames => { console.log(filenames) } );

There are basically two ways of accomplishing this. In an async environment you'll notice that there are two kinds of loops: serial and parallel. A serial loop waits for one iteration to complete before it moves onto the next iteration - this guarantees that every iteration of the loop completes in order. In a parallel loop, all the iterations are started at the same time, and one may complete before another, however, it is much faster than a serial loop. So in this case, it's probably better to use a parallel loop because it doesn't matter what order the walk completes in, just as long as it completes and returns the results (unless you want them in order).

一个平行循环看起来是这样的:

var fs = require('fs');
var path = require('path');
var walk = function(dir, done) {
  var results = [];
  fs.readdir(dir, function(err, list) {
    if (err) return done(err);
    var pending = list.length;
    if (!pending) return done(null, results);
    list.forEach(function(file) {
      file = path.resolve(dir, file);
      fs.stat(file, function(err, stat) {
        if (stat && stat.isDirectory()) {
          walk(file, function(err, res) {
            results = results.concat(res);
            if (!--pending) done(null, results);
          });
        } else {
          results.push(file);
          if (!--pending) done(null, results);
        }
      });
    });
  });
};

一个串行循环看起来像这样:

var fs = require('fs');
var path = require('path');
var walk = function(dir, done) {
  var results = [];
  fs.readdir(dir, function(err, list) {
    if (err) return done(err);
    var i = 0;
    (function next() {
      var file = list[i++];
      if (!file) return done(null, results);
      file = path.resolve(dir, file);
      fs.stat(file, function(err, stat) {
        if (stat && stat.isDirectory()) {
          walk(file, function(err, res) {
            results = results.concat(res);
            next();
          });
        } else {
          results.push(file);
          next();
        }
      });
    })();
  });
};

并且在你的主目录中测试它(警告:如果你的主目录中有很多东西，结果列表将会非常大):

walk(process.env.HOME, function(err, results) {
  if (err) throw err;
  console.log(results);
});

编辑:改进的示例。