关于使用fs.readdir进行异步目录搜索有什么想法吗?我意识到我们可以引入递归,并调用read目录函数来读取下一个目录,但我有点担心它不是异步的…

什么好主意吗?我已经看了node-walk,它很棒,但它不能像readdir那样只给我数组中的文件。虽然

寻找这样的输出…

['file1.txt', 'file2.txt', 'dir/file3.txt']

当前回答

我喜欢上面chjj的答案,如果没有那个开始,我就无法创建我的并行循环版本。

var fs = require("fs");

var tree = function(dir, done) {
  var results = {
        "path": dir
        ,"children": []
      };
  fs.readdir(dir, function(err, list) {
    if (err) { return done(err); }
    var pending = list.length;
    if (!pending) { return done(null, results); }
    list.forEach(function(file) {
      fs.stat(dir + '/' + file, function(err, stat) {
        if (stat && stat.isDirectory()) {
          tree(dir + '/' + file, function(err, res) {
            results.children.push(res);
            if (!--pending){ done(null, results); }
          });
        } else {
          results.children.push({"path": dir + "/" + file});
          if (!--pending) { done(null, results); }
        }
      });
    });
  });
};

module.exports = tree;

我也创建了一个Gist。欢迎评论。我仍然在NodeJS领域起步,所以这是我希望学到更多的一种方式。

其他回答

为了以防有人发现它有用,我还整理了一个同步版本。

var walk = function(dir) {
    var results = [];
    var list = fs.readdirSync(dir);
    list.forEach(function(file) {
        file = dir + '/' + file;
        var stat = fs.statSync(file);
        if (stat && stat.isDirectory()) { 
            /* Recurse into a subdirectory */
            results = results.concat(walk(file));
        } else { 
            /* Is a file */
            results.push(file);
        }
    });
    return results;
}

提示:在筛选时使用更少的资源。这个函数本身的过滤器。例如:替换results.push(文件);下面的代码。根据需要调整:

    file_type = file.split(".").pop();
    file_name = file.split(/(\\|\/)/g).pop();
    if (file_type == "json") results.push(file);

看看装载机 https://npmjs.org/package/loaddir

npm无处不在

  loaddir = require('loaddir')

  allJavascripts = []
  loaddir({
    path: __dirname + '/public/javascripts',
    callback: function(){  allJavascripts.push(this.relativePath + this.baseName); }
  })

如果还需要扩展名,可以使用fileName而不是baseName。

一个额外的好处是,它也会监视文件,并再次调用回调。有大量的配置选项使它非常灵活。

我只是在短时间内用加载器从红宝石重造了守卫宝石

a .看一下文件模块。它有一个叫walk的函数:

文件。步行(开始,回调) 导航文件树,为每个目录调用回调,传入 (null, dirPath, dirs, files)。

这可能是为你准备的!是的,它是异步的。但是,如果需要的话,我认为您必须自己聚合完整的路径。

B.另一种选择,甚至是我的最爱之一:使用unix find来查找。为什么要再做一件已经编程好的事情呢?也许不是你真正需要的,但仍然值得一试:

var execFile = require('child_process').execFile;
execFile('find', [ 'somepath/' ], function(err, stdout, stderr) {
  var file_list = stdout.split('\n');
  /* now you've got a list with full path file names */
});

Find有一个很好的内置缓存机制,使得后续搜索非常快,只要只有少数文件夹被更改。

另一个答案,但这次使用的是TypeScript:

/** * Recursively walk a directory asynchronously and obtain all file names (with full path). * * @param dir Folder name you want to recursively process * @param done Callback function, returns all files with full path. * @param filter Optional filter to specify which files to include, * e.g. for json files: (f: string) => /.json$/.test(f) */ const walk = ( dir: string, done: (err: Error | null, results ? : string[]) => void, filter ? : (f: string) => boolean ) => { let results: string[] = []; fs.readdir(dir, (err: Error, list: string[]) => { if (err) { return done(err); } let pending = list.length; if (!pending) { return done(null, results); } list.forEach((file: string) => { file = path.resolve(dir, file); fs.stat(file, (err2, stat) => { if (stat && stat.isDirectory()) { walk(file, (err3, res) => { if (res) { results = results.concat(res); } if (!--pending) { done(null, results); } }, filter); } else { if (typeof filter === 'undefined' || (filter && filter(file))) { results.push(file); } if (!--pending) { done(null, results); } } }); }); }); };

There are basically two ways of accomplishing this. In an async environment you'll notice that there are two kinds of loops: serial and parallel. A serial loop waits for one iteration to complete before it moves onto the next iteration - this guarantees that every iteration of the loop completes in order. In a parallel loop, all the iterations are started at the same time, and one may complete before another, however, it is much faster than a serial loop. So in this case, it's probably better to use a parallel loop because it doesn't matter what order the walk completes in, just as long as it completes and returns the results (unless you want them in order).

一个平行循环看起来是这样的:

var fs = require('fs');
var path = require('path');
var walk = function(dir, done) {
  var results = [];
  fs.readdir(dir, function(err, list) {
    if (err) return done(err);
    var pending = list.length;
    if (!pending) return done(null, results);
    list.forEach(function(file) {
      file = path.resolve(dir, file);
      fs.stat(file, function(err, stat) {
        if (stat && stat.isDirectory()) {
          walk(file, function(err, res) {
            results = results.concat(res);
            if (!--pending) done(null, results);
          });
        } else {
          results.push(file);
          if (!--pending) done(null, results);
        }
      });
    });
  });
};

一个串行循环看起来像这样:

var fs = require('fs');
var path = require('path');
var walk = function(dir, done) {
  var results = [];
  fs.readdir(dir, function(err, list) {
    if (err) return done(err);
    var i = 0;
    (function next() {
      var file = list[i++];
      if (!file) return done(null, results);
      file = path.resolve(dir, file);
      fs.stat(file, function(err, stat) {
        if (stat && stat.isDirectory()) {
          walk(file, function(err, res) {
            results = results.concat(res);
            next();
          });
        } else {
          results.push(file);
          next();
        }
      });
    })();
  });
};

并且在你的主目录中测试它(警告:如果你的主目录中有很多东西,结果列表将会非常大):

walk(process.env.HOME, function(err, results) {
  if (err) throw err;
  console.log(results);
});

编辑:改进的示例。