关于使用fs.readdir进行异步目录搜索有什么想法吗?我意识到我们可以引入递归,并调用read目录函数来读取下一个目录,但我有点担心它不是异步的…
什么好主意吗?我已经看了node-walk,它很棒,但它不能像readdir那样只给我数组中的文件。虽然
寻找这样的输出…
['file1.txt', 'file2.txt', 'dir/file3.txt']
关于使用fs.readdir进行异步目录搜索有什么想法吗?我意识到我们可以引入递归,并调用read目录函数来读取下一个目录,但我有点担心它不是异步的…
什么好主意吗?我已经看了node-walk,它很棒,但它不能像readdir那样只给我数组中的文件。虽然
寻找这样的输出…
['file1.txt', 'file2.txt', 'dir/file3.txt']
当前回答
另一个简单而有用的方法
function walkDir(root) {
const stat = fs.statSync(root);
if (stat.isDirectory()) {
const dirs = fs.readdirSync(root).filter(item => !item.startsWith('.'));
let results = dirs.map(sub => walkDir(`${root}/${sub}`));
return [].concat(...results);
} else {
return root;
}
}
其他回答
用递归
var fs = require('fs')
var path = process.cwd()
var files = []
var getFiles = function(path, files){
fs.readdirSync(path).forEach(function(file){
var subpath = path + '/' + file;
if(fs.lstatSync(subpath).isDirectory()){
getFiles(subpath, files);
} else {
files.push(path + '/' + file);
}
});
}
调用
getFiles(path, files)
console.log(files) // will log all files in directory
对于Node 10.3+,这里是一个For -await解决方案:
#!/usr/bin/env node
const FS = require('fs');
const Util = require('util');
const readDir = Util.promisify(FS.readdir);
const Path = require('path');
async function* readDirR(path) {
const entries = await readDir(path,{withFileTypes:true});
for(let entry of entries) {
const fullPath = Path.join(path,entry.name);
if(entry.isDirectory()) {
yield* readDirR(fullPath);
} else {
yield fullPath;
}
}
}
async function main() {
const start = process.hrtime.bigint();
for await(const file of readDirR('/mnt/home/media/Unsorted')) {
console.log(file);
}
console.log((process.hrtime.bigint()-start)/1000000n);
}
main().catch(err => {
console.error(err);
});
这种解决方案的好处是,您可以立即开始处理结果;例如,读取媒体目录中的所有文件需要12秒,但如果我这样做,我可以在几毫秒内得到第一个结果。
There are basically two ways of accomplishing this. In an async environment you'll notice that there are two kinds of loops: serial and parallel. A serial loop waits for one iteration to complete before it moves onto the next iteration - this guarantees that every iteration of the loop completes in order. In a parallel loop, all the iterations are started at the same time, and one may complete before another, however, it is much faster than a serial loop. So in this case, it's probably better to use a parallel loop because it doesn't matter what order the walk completes in, just as long as it completes and returns the results (unless you want them in order).
一个平行循环看起来是这样的:
var fs = require('fs');
var path = require('path');
var walk = function(dir, done) {
var results = [];
fs.readdir(dir, function(err, list) {
if (err) return done(err);
var pending = list.length;
if (!pending) return done(null, results);
list.forEach(function(file) {
file = path.resolve(dir, file);
fs.stat(file, function(err, stat) {
if (stat && stat.isDirectory()) {
walk(file, function(err, res) {
results = results.concat(res);
if (!--pending) done(null, results);
});
} else {
results.push(file);
if (!--pending) done(null, results);
}
});
});
});
};
一个串行循环看起来像这样:
var fs = require('fs');
var path = require('path');
var walk = function(dir, done) {
var results = [];
fs.readdir(dir, function(err, list) {
if (err) return done(err);
var i = 0;
(function next() {
var file = list[i++];
if (!file) return done(null, results);
file = path.resolve(dir, file);
fs.stat(file, function(err, stat) {
if (stat && stat.isDirectory()) {
walk(file, function(err, res) {
results = results.concat(res);
next();
});
} else {
results.push(file);
next();
}
});
})();
});
};
并且在你的主目录中测试它(警告:如果你的主目录中有很多东西,结果列表将会非常大):
walk(process.env.HOME, function(err, results) {
if (err) throw err;
console.log(results);
});
编辑:改进的示例。
使用承诺(Q)以函数式风格解决此问题:
var fs = require('fs'),
fsPath = require('path'),
Q = require('q');
var walk = function (dir) {
return Q.ninvoke(fs, 'readdir', dir).then(function (files) {
return Q.all(files.map(function (file) {
file = fsPath.join(dir, file);
return Q.ninvoke(fs, 'lstat', file).then(function (stat) {
if (stat.isDirectory()) {
return walk(file);
} else {
return [file];
}
});
}));
}).then(function (files) {
return files.reduce(function (pre, cur) {
return pre.concat(cur);
});
});
};
它返回一个数组的promise,所以你可以这样使用它:
walk('/home/mypath').then(function (files) { console.log(files); });
只是简单的散步
let pending = [baseFolderPath]
function walk () {
pending.shift();
// do stuffs width pending[0] and change pending items
if (pending[0]) walk(pending[0])
}
walk(pending[0])