从Java 17开始，您可以对开关表达式(预览特性)JEP-406使用模式匹配。

public void doAction(Object o) {
    return switch (o) {
        case A a -> doA(a);
        case B b -> doB(b);
        case C c -> doC(c);
        default -> log.warn("Unrecognized type of {}", o);
    };
}

防护模式也可用:

public void doAction(Object o) {
    return switch (o) {
        case String s && !s.isBlank() -> handle(s);
    };
}

你需要启用预览功能来使用它:java——enable-preview

这个怎么样?

switch (this.name) 
{
  case "A":
    doA();
    break;
  case "B":
    doB();
    break;
  case "C":
    doC();
    break;
  default:
    console.log('Undefined instance');
}

While it is not possible to write a switch statement, it is possible to branch out to specific processing for each given type. One way of doing this is to use standard double dispatch mechanism. An example where we want to "switch" based on type is Jersey Exception mapper where we need to map multitude of exceptions to error responses. While for this specific case there is probably a better way (i.e. using a polymorphic method that translates each exception to an error response), using double dispatch mechanism is still useful and practical.

interface Processable {
    <R> R process(final Processor<R> processor);
}

interface Processor<R> {
    R process(final A a);
    R process(final B b);
    R process(final C c);
    // for each type of Processable
    ...
}

class A implements Processable {
    // other class logic here

    <R> R process(final Processor<R> processor){
        return processor.process(this);
    }
}

class B implements Processable {
    // other class logic here

    <R> R process(final Processor<R> processor){
        return processor.process(this);
    }
}

class C implements Processable {
    // other class logic here

    <R> R process(final Processor<R> processor){
        return processor.process(this);
    }
}

然后在任何需要“开关”的地方，你可以这样做:

public class LogProcessor implements Processor<String> {
    private static final Logger log = Logger.for(LogProcessor.class);

    public void logIt(final Processable base) {
        log.info("Logging for type {}", process(base));
    }

    // Processor methods, these are basically the effective "case" statements
    String process(final A a) {
        return "Stringifying A";
    }

    String process(final B b) {
        return "Stringifying B";
    }

    String process(final C c) {
        return "Stringifying C";
    }
}

我个人比较喜欢下面的Java 1.8代码:

    mySwitch("YY")
            .myCase("AA", (o) -> {
                System.out.println(o+"aa");
            })
            .myCase("BB", (o) -> {
                System.out.println(o+"bb");
            })
            .myCase("YY", (o) -> {
                System.out.println(o+"yy");
            })
            .myCase("ZZ", (o) -> {
                System.out.println(o+"zz");
            });

将输出:

YYyy

示例代码使用字符串，但您可以使用任何对象类型，包括Class。例如:. mycase (this.getClass()， (o) ->…

需要以下片段:

public Case mySwitch(Object reference) {
    return new Case(reference);
}

public class Case {

    private Object reference;

    public Case(Object reference) {
        this.reference = reference;
    }

    public Case myCase(Object b, OnMatchDo task) {
        if (reference.equals(b)) {
            task.task(reference);
        }
        return this;
    }
}

public interface OnMatchDo {
    public void task(Object o);
}

以防万一有人读到

java中的最佳解决方案是:

public enum Action { 
    a{
        void doAction(...){
            // some code
        }

    }, 
    b{
        void doAction(...){
            // some code
        }

    }, 
    c{
        void doAction(...){
            // some code
        }

    };

    abstract void doAction (...);
}

这种模式的最大好处是:

你只需要这样做(完全没有开关): void someFunction (Action Action) { action.doAction(…); ｝ 在这种情况下，如果你添加新的动作称为“d”，你必须实现doAction(…)方法

注意:此模式在Joshua’s Bloch“Effective Java (2nd Edition)”中有描述

下面是在Java 8中使用http://www.vavr.io/来实现这一功能的方法

import static io.vavr.API.*;
import static io.vavr.Predicates.instanceOf;
public Throwable liftRootCause(final Throwable throwable) {
        return Match(throwable).of(
                Case($(instanceOf(CompletionException.class)), Throwable::getCause),
                Case($(instanceOf(ExecutionException.class)), Throwable::getCause),
                Case($(), th -> th)
        );
    }