如果你绝对不能编码到接口，那么你可以使用枚举作为中介:

public A() {

    CLAZZ z = CLAZZ.valueOf(this.getClass().getSimpleName());
    switch (z) {
    case A:
        doA();
        break;
    case B:
        doB();
        break;
    case C:
        doC();
        break;
    }
}


enum CLAZZ {
    A,B,C;

}

你不能只使用字节，short, char, int, String和枚举类型(以及原语的对象版本，这也取决于你的java版本，字符串可以在java 7中切换)

这个怎么样?

switch (this.name) 
{
  case "A":
    doA();
    break;
  case "B":
    doB();
    break;
  case "C":
    doC();
    break;
  default:
    console.log('Undefined instance');
}

Java现在允许你以op的方式切换。他们称之为模式匹配切换。它在Java 17发布。JEP中给出的例子是

String formatted;
switch (obj) {
    case Integer i: formatted = String.format("int %d", i); break;
    case Byte b:    formatted = String.format("byte %d", b); break;
    case Long l:    formatted = String.format("long %d", l); break;
    case Double d:  formatted = String.format("double %f", d); break;
    case String s:  formatted = String.format("String %s", s); break
    default:        formatted = obj.toString();
}  

或者使用他们的lambda语法并返回一个值

String formatted = 
    switch (obj) {
        case Integer i -> String.format("int %d", i)
        case Byte b    -> String.format("byte %d", b);
        case Long l    -> String.format("long %d", l); 
        case Double d  -> String.format("double %f", d); 
        case String s  -> String.format("String %s", s); 
        default        -> obj.toString();
    };

不管怎样，他们一直在用开关做很酷的东西。

While it is not possible to write a switch statement, it is possible to branch out to specific processing for each given type. One way of doing this is to use standard double dispatch mechanism. An example where we want to "switch" based on type is Jersey Exception mapper where we need to map multitude of exceptions to error responses. While for this specific case there is probably a better way (i.e. using a polymorphic method that translates each exception to an error response), using double dispatch mechanism is still useful and practical.

interface Processable {
    <R> R process(final Processor<R> processor);
}

interface Processor<R> {
    R process(final A a);
    R process(final B b);
    R process(final C c);
    // for each type of Processable
    ...
}

class A implements Processable {
    // other class logic here

    <R> R process(final Processor<R> processor){
        return processor.process(this);
    }
}

class B implements Processable {
    // other class logic here

    <R> R process(final Processor<R> processor){
        return processor.process(this);
    }
}

class C implements Processable {
    // other class logic here

    <R> R process(final Processor<R> processor){
        return processor.process(this);
    }
}

然后在任何需要“开关”的地方，你可以这样做:

public class LogProcessor implements Processor<String> {
    private static final Logger log = Logger.for(LogProcessor.class);

    public void logIt(final Processable base) {
        log.info("Logging for type {}", process(base));
    }

    // Processor methods, these are basically the effective "case" statements
    String process(final A a) {
        return "Stringifying A";
    }

    String process(final B b) {
        return "Stringifying B";
    }

    String process(final C c) {
        return "Stringifying C";
    }
}

如果需要通过“this”对象的类类型“切换”，这个答案是最好的https://stackoverflow.com/a/5579385/2078368

但如果你需要将“switch”应用于任何其他变量。我建议另一种解决办法。定义以下接口:

public interface ClassTypeInterface {
    public String getType();
}

在你想要“切换”的每个类中实现这个接口。例子:

public class A extends Something implements ClassTypeInterface {

    public final static String TYPE = "A";

    @Override
    public String getType() {
        return TYPE;
    }
}

之后，你可以用以下方式使用它:

switch (var.getType()) {
    case A.TYPE: {
        break;
    }
    case B.TYPE: {
        break;
    }
    ...
}

你唯一需要关心的是——在实现ClassTypeInterface的所有类中保持“类型”的唯一性。这不是一个大问题，因为在任何交集的情况下，您都会收到“switch-case”语句的编译时错误。