以防万一有人读到

java中的最佳解决方案是:

public enum Action { 
    a{
        void doAction(...){
            // some code
        }

    }, 
    b{
        void doAction(...){
            // some code
        }

    }, 
    c{
        void doAction(...){
            // some code
        }

    };

    abstract void doAction (...);
}

这种模式的最大好处是:

你只需要这样做(完全没有开关): void someFunction (Action Action) { action.doAction(…); ｝ 在这种情况下，如果你添加新的动作称为“d”，你必须实现doAction(…)方法

注意:此模式在Joshua’s Bloch“Effective Java (2nd Edition)”中有描述

不，这是不可能的。然而，您可能想要做的是将多态性作为处理这类问题的一种方法。

在最近发布的Java 19中，这非常简单和有用: 创建接口，并具有名为makesomenoise()的方法，它接受动物参数。

void makeSomeNoise (Animal animal) {
switch (animal) {
case Dog dog → dog.bark();
case Cat catcat.meow();
default throw new RuntimeException ("WTH is it???");
}
}

如果您想避免If (){} else If{}的冗长，您可以考虑将这个文件切换到kotlin，并将类似于开关的when表达式与is操作符结合使用。

在任何情况下，Kotlin和java文件都可以共存于一个项目中，并生成一个可以在JVM中运行的jar。

when (this) { //switch-like statement in kotlin supporting class-pattern-matching and smart casts via `is` operator.
    is A -> doA()
    is B -> doB()
    is C -> doC()
}

从Java 17开始，您可以对开关表达式(预览特性)JEP-406使用模式匹配。

public void doAction(Object o) {
    return switch (o) {
        case A a -> doA(a);
        case B b -> doB(b);
        case C c -> doC(c);
        default -> log.warn("Unrecognized type of {}", o);
    };
}

防护模式也可用:

public void doAction(Object o) {
    return switch (o) {
        case String s && !s.isBlank() -> handle(s);
    };
}

你需要启用预览功能来使用它:java——enable-preview

While it is not possible to write a switch statement, it is possible to branch out to specific processing for each given type. One way of doing this is to use standard double dispatch mechanism. An example where we want to "switch" based on type is Jersey Exception mapper where we need to map multitude of exceptions to error responses. While for this specific case there is probably a better way (i.e. using a polymorphic method that translates each exception to an error response), using double dispatch mechanism is still useful and practical.

interface Processable {
    <R> R process(final Processor<R> processor);
}

interface Processor<R> {
    R process(final A a);
    R process(final B b);
    R process(final C c);
    // for each type of Processable
    ...
}

class A implements Processable {
    // other class logic here

    <R> R process(final Processor<R> processor){
        return processor.process(this);
    }
}

class B implements Processable {
    // other class logic here

    <R> R process(final Processor<R> processor){
        return processor.process(this);
    }
}

class C implements Processable {
    // other class logic here

    <R> R process(final Processor<R> processor){
        return processor.process(this);
    }
}

然后在任何需要“开关”的地方，你可以这样做:

public class LogProcessor implements Processor<String> {
    private static final Logger log = Logger.for(LogProcessor.class);

    public void logIt(final Processable base) {
        log.info("Logging for type {}", process(base));
    }

    // Processor methods, these are basically the effective "case" statements
    String process(final A a) {
        return "Stringifying A";
    }

    String process(final B b) {
        return "Stringifying B";
    }

    String process(final C c) {
        return "Stringifying C";
    }
}