我认为使用switch语句是有原因的。如果你使用xText生成的代码。或者另一种EMF生成的类。

instance.getClass().getName();

返回类实现名称的字符串。即: org.eclipse.emf.ecore.util.EcoreUtil

instance.getClass().getSimpleName();

返回简单的表示形式，即: EcoreUtil

如果你绝对不能编码到接口，那么你可以使用枚举作为中介:

public A() {

    CLAZZ z = CLAZZ.valueOf(this.getClass().getSimpleName());
    switch (z) {
    case A:
        doA();
        break;
    case B:
        doB();
        break;
    case C:
        doC();
        break;
    }
}


enum CLAZZ {
    A,B,C;

}

像这样使用switch语句不是面向对象的方式。相反，您应该使用多态性的力量。简单的写

this.do()

之前已经建立了一个基类:

abstract class Base {
   abstract void do();
   ...
}

它是A, B和C的基类:

class A extends Base {
    void do() { this.doA() }
}

class B extends Base {
    void do() { this.doB() }
}

class C extends Base {
    void do() { this.doC() }
}

如果您想避免If (){} else If{}的冗长，您可以考虑将这个文件切换到kotlin，并将类似于开关的when表达式与is操作符结合使用。

在任何情况下，Kotlin和java文件都可以共存于一个项目中，并生成一个可以在JVM中运行的jar。

when (this) { //switch-like statement in kotlin supporting class-pattern-matching and smart casts via `is` operator.
    is A -> doA()
    is B -> doB()
    is C -> doC()
}

While it is not possible to write a switch statement, it is possible to branch out to specific processing for each given type. One way of doing this is to use standard double dispatch mechanism. An example where we want to "switch" based on type is Jersey Exception mapper where we need to map multitude of exceptions to error responses. While for this specific case there is probably a better way (i.e. using a polymorphic method that translates each exception to an error response), using double dispatch mechanism is still useful and practical.

interface Processable {
    <R> R process(final Processor<R> processor);
}

interface Processor<R> {
    R process(final A a);
    R process(final B b);
    R process(final C c);
    // for each type of Processable
    ...
}

class A implements Processable {
    // other class logic here

    <R> R process(final Processor<R> processor){
        return processor.process(this);
    }
}

class B implements Processable {
    // other class logic here

    <R> R process(final Processor<R> processor){
        return processor.process(this);
    }
}

class C implements Processable {
    // other class logic here

    <R> R process(final Processor<R> processor){
        return processor.process(this);
    }
}

然后在任何需要“开关”的地方，你可以这样做:

public class LogProcessor implements Processor<String> {
    private static final Logger log = Logger.for(LogProcessor.class);

    public void logIt(final Processable base) {
        log.info("Logging for type {}", process(base));
    }

    // Processor methods, these are basically the effective "case" statements
    String process(final A a) {
        return "Stringifying A";
    }

    String process(final B b) {
        return "Stringifying B";
    }

    String process(final C c) {
        return "Stringifying C";
    }
}

这是子类型多态有助于实现的典型场景。执行以下步骤

interface I {
  void do();
}

class A implements I { void do() { doA() } ... }
class B implements I { void do() { doB() } ... }
class C implements I { void do() { doC() } ... }

然后您可以简单地在此上调用do()。

如果您不能自由地更改A、B和C，则可以应用访问者模式来实现相同的目的。