创建一个Map，其中键为Class<?>，值为表达式(lambda或类似)。考虑:

Map<Class,Runnable> doByClass = new HashMap<>();
doByClass.put(Foo.class, () -> doAClosure(this));
doByClass.put(Bar.class, this::doBMethod);
doByClass.put(Baz.class, new MyCRunnable());

// of course, refactor this to only initialize once

doByClass.get(getClass()).run();

如果你需要检查异常，那就实现一个抛出异常的FunctionalInterface，而不是使用Runnable。

下面是一个真实的单词前后对比，展示了这种方法如何简化代码。

重构映射之前的代码:

private Object unmarshall(
  final Property<?> property, final Object configValue ) {
  final Object result;
  final String value = configValue.toString();

  if( property instanceof SimpleDoubleProperty ) {
    result = Double.parseDouble( value );
  }
  else if( property instanceof SimpleFloatProperty ) {
    result = Float.parseFloat( value );
  }
  else if( property instanceof SimpleBooleanProperty ) {
    result = Boolean.parseBoolean( value );
  }
  else if( property instanceof SimpleFileProperty ) {
    result = new File( value );
  }
  else {
    result = value;
  }

  return result;
}

重构为映射后的代码:

private final Map<Class<?>, Function<String, Object>> UNMARSHALL = 
Map.of(
  SimpleBooleanProperty.class, Boolean::parseBoolean,
  SimpleDoubleProperty.class, Double::parseDouble,
  SimpleFloatProperty.class, Float::parseFloat,
  SimpleFileProperty.class, File::new
);

private Object unmarshall(
  final Property<?> property, final Object configValue ) {
  return UNMARSHALL
    .getOrDefault( property.getClass(), ( v ) -> v )
    .apply( configValue.toString() );
}

这避免了重复，消除了几乎所有的分支语句，并简化了维护。

不幸的是，这是不可能开箱即用的，因为开关case语句需要一个常量表达式。要克服这个问题，一种方法是将枚举值与类名一起使用。

public enum MyEnum {
   A(A.class.getName()), 
   B(B.class.getName()),
   C(C.class.getName());

private String refClassname;
private static final Map<String, MyEnum> ENUM_MAP;

MyEnum (String refClassname) {
    this.refClassname = refClassname;
}

static {
    Map<String, MyEnum> map = new ConcurrentHashMap<String, MyEnum>();
    for (MyEnum instance : MyEnum.values()) {
        map.put(instance.refClassname, instance);
    }
    ENUM_MAP = Collections.unmodifiableMap(map);
}

public static MyEnum get(String name) {
    return ENUM_MAP.get(name);
 }
}

这样就可以像这样使用switch语句

MyEnum type = MyEnum.get(clazz.getName());
switch (type) {
case A:
    ... // it's A class
case B:
    ... // it's B class
case C:
    ... // it's C class
}

我知道这有点晚了，但对于未来的读者来说……

注意上面的方法，这些方法仅仅是基于A, B, C类的名称…：

除非你能保证A, B, C…(Base的所有子类或实现者)是final，然后A, B, C的子类…不会被处理。

即使if, elseif, elseif ..方法对于大量子类/实现者较慢，它更准确。

这是子类型多态有助于实现的典型场景。执行以下步骤

interface I {
  void do();
}

class A implements I { void do() { doA() } ... }
class B implements I { void do() { doB() } ... }
class C implements I { void do() { doC() } ... }

然后您可以简单地在此上调用do()。

如果您不能自由地更改A、B和C，则可以应用访问者模式来实现相同的目的。

从Java 17开始，您可以对开关表达式(预览特性)JEP-406使用模式匹配。

public void doAction(Object o) {
    return switch (o) {
        case A a -> doA(a);
        case B b -> doB(b);
        case C c -> doC(c);
        default -> log.warn("Unrecognized type of {}", o);
    };
}

防护模式也可用:

public void doAction(Object o) {
    return switch (o) {
        case String s && !s.isBlank() -> handle(s);
    };
}

你需要启用预览功能来使用它:java——enable-preview

While it is not possible to write a switch statement, it is possible to branch out to specific processing for each given type. One way of doing this is to use standard double dispatch mechanism. An example where we want to "switch" based on type is Jersey Exception mapper where we need to map multitude of exceptions to error responses. While for this specific case there is probably a better way (i.e. using a polymorphic method that translates each exception to an error response), using double dispatch mechanism is still useful and practical.

interface Processable {
    <R> R process(final Processor<R> processor);
}

interface Processor<R> {
    R process(final A a);
    R process(final B b);
    R process(final C c);
    // for each type of Processable
    ...
}

class A implements Processable {
    // other class logic here

    <R> R process(final Processor<R> processor){
        return processor.process(this);
    }
}

class B implements Processable {
    // other class logic here

    <R> R process(final Processor<R> processor){
        return processor.process(this);
    }
}

class C implements Processable {
    // other class logic here

    <R> R process(final Processor<R> processor){
        return processor.process(this);
    }
}

然后在任何需要“开关”的地方，你可以这样做:

public class LogProcessor implements Processor<String> {
    private static final Logger log = Logger.for(LogProcessor.class);

    public void logIt(final Processable base) {
        log.info("Logging for type {}", process(base));
    }

    // Processor methods, these are basically the effective "case" statements
    String process(final A a) {
        return "Stringifying A";
    }

    String process(final B b) {
        return "Stringifying B";
    }

    String process(final C c) {
        return "Stringifying C";
    }
}