摘自c++ FAQ Lite:

The members and base classes of a struct are public by default, while in class, they default to private. Note: you should make your base classes explicitly public, private, or protected, rather than relying on the defaults. struct and class are otherwise functionally equivalent. OK, enough of that squeaky clean techno talk. Emotionally, most developers make a strong distinction between a class and a struct. A struct simply feels like an open pile of bits with very little in the way of encapsulation or functionality. A class feels like a living and responsible member of society with intelligent services, a strong encapsulation barrier, and a well defined interface. Since that's the connotation most people already have, you should probably use the struct keyword if you have a class that has very few methods and has public data (such things do exist in well designed systems!), but otherwise you should probably use the class keyword.

默认情况下，结构具有公共访问权限，类具有私有访问权限。

就我个人而言，我使用结构作为数据传输对象或作为值对象。当这样使用时，我将所有成员声明为const，以防止其他代码修改。

c++中类和结构的区别是:

结构成员和基类/结构在默认情况下是公共的。 默认情况下，类成员和基类/结构是私有的。

类和结构都可以混合使用public、protected和private成员，可以使用继承，也可以有成员函数。

我向你推荐:

对于没有任何类样特性的普通旧数据结构使用struct; 在使用私有或受保护成员、非默认构造函数和操作符等特性时使用类。

摘自c++ FAQ Lite:

The members and base classes of a struct are public by default, while in class, they default to private. Note: you should make your base classes explicitly public, private, or protected, rather than relying on the defaults. struct and class are otherwise functionally equivalent. OK, enough of that squeaky clean techno talk. Emotionally, most developers make a strong distinction between a class and a struct. A struct simply feels like an open pile of bits with very little in the way of encapsulation or functionality. A class feels like a living and responsible member of society with intelligent services, a strong encapsulation barrier, and a well defined interface. Since that's the connotation most people already have, you should probably use the struct keyword if you have a class that has very few methods and has public data (such things do exist in well designed systems!), but otherwise you should probably use the class keyword.

正如其他人所指出的那样，真正的语言差异只有两个:

Struct默认为公共访问，class默认为私有访问。 继承时，struct默认为公共继承，class默认为私有继承。(具有讽刺意味的是，与c++中的许多东西一样，默认是反向的:公共继承是迄今为止更常见的选择，但人们很少声明结构只是为了节省键入“public”关键字。

但在实践中，真正的区别在于声明构造函数/析构函数的类/结构与未声明构造函数/析构函数的类/结构之间的区别。对于“普通的旧数据”POD类型有一定的保证，一旦接管类的构造就不再适用。为了明确这种区别，许多人故意只对POD类型使用结构体，如果他们要添加任何方法，则使用类。下面两个片段之间的区别是没有意义的:

class X
{
  public:

  // ...
};

struct X
{
  // ...
};

(顺便提一句，这里有一个线程，对“POD类型”的实际含义有一些很好的解释:c++中的POD类型是什么?)

struct和class在本质上是相同的，尽管在可见性方面有不同的默认值，struct的默认值是公共的，而类的默认值是私有的。您可以通过适当地使用private和public将其中一个更改为另一个。它们都允许继承、方法、构造函数、析构函数以及面向对象语言的所有其他优点。

然而，两者之间的一个巨大区别是C支持struct作为关键字，而class不支持。这意味着可以在包含文件中使用一个可以#include到c++或C中的结构体，只要该结构体是一个普通的C风格结构体，并且包含文件中的其他内容与C兼容，即没有c++特定的关键字，如private, public, no方法，no继承，等等等等。

C风格结构体可以与其他支持使用C风格结构体在接口上来回传输数据的接口一起使用。

C风格结构是一种模板(不是c++模板，而是一种模式或模板)，用于描述内存区域的布局。多年来，C语言和C插件(这里是Java、Python和Visual Basic)已经创建了可用的接口，其中一些与C风格的结构体一起工作。