我有一个foreach循环,需要执行一些逻辑时,最后一项是从列表中选择,例如:
foreach (Item result in Model.Results)
{
//if current result is the last item in Model.Results
//then do something in the code
}
我可以知道哪个循环是最后没有使用循环和计数器吗?
我有一个foreach循环,需要执行一些逻辑时,最后一项是从列表中选择,例如:
foreach (Item result in Model.Results)
{
//if current result is the last item in Model.Results
//then do something in the code
}
我可以知道哪个循环是最后没有使用循环和计数器吗?
当前回答
foreach (DataRow drow in ds.Tables[0].Rows)
{
cnt_sl1 = "<div class='col-md-6'><div class='Slider-img'>" +
"<div class='row'><img src='" + drow["images_path"].ToString() + "' alt='' />" +
"</div></div></div>";
cnt_sl2 = "<div class='col-md-6'><div class='Slider-details'>" +
"<p>" + drow["situation_details"].ToString() + "</p>" +
"</div></div>";
if (i == 0)
{
lblSituationName.Text = drow["situation"].ToString();
}
if (drow["images_position"].ToString() == "0")
{
content += "<div class='item'>" + cnt_sl1 + cnt_sl2 + "</div>";
cnt_sl1 = "";
cnt_sl2 = "";
}
else if (drow["images_position"].ToString() == "1")
{
content += "<div class='item'>" + cnt_sl2 + cnt_sl1 + "</div>";
cnt_sl1 = "";
cnt_sl2 = "";
}
i++;
}
其他回答
一个老式的for循环怎么样?
for (int i = 0; i < Model.Results.Count; i++) {
if (i == Model.Results.Count - 1) {
// this is the last item
}
}
或者使用Linq和foreach:
foreach (Item result in Model.Results)
{
if (Model.Results.IndexOf(result) == Model.Results.Count - 1) {
// this is the last item
}
}
正如Shimmy所指出的,使用Last()可能会导致性能问题,例如,如果您的集合是LINQ表达式的实时结果。为了防止多次迭代,你可以使用“ForEach”扩展方法,如下所示:
var elements = new[] { "A", "B", "C" };
elements.ForEach((element, info) => {
if (!info.IsLast) {
Console.WriteLine(element);
} else {
Console.WriteLine("Last one: " + element);
}
});
扩展方法看起来像这样(作为额外的奖励,它还会告诉你索引,如果你在看第一个元素):
public static class EnumerableExtensions {
public delegate void ElementAction<in T>(T element, ElementInfo info);
public static void ForEach<T>(this IEnumerable<T> elements, ElementAction<T> action) {
using (IEnumerator<T> enumerator = elements.GetEnumerator())
{
bool isFirst = true;
bool hasNext = enumerator.MoveNext();
int index = 0;
while (hasNext)
{
T current = enumerator.Current;
hasNext = enumerator.MoveNext();
action(current, new ElementInfo(index, isFirst, !hasNext));
isFirst = false;
index++;
}
}
}
public struct ElementInfo {
public ElementInfo(int index, bool isFirst, bool isLast)
: this() {
Index = index;
IsFirst = isFirst;
IsLast = isLast;
}
public int Index { get; private set; }
public bool IsFirst { get; private set; }
public bool IsLast { get; private set; }
}
}
另一种方法是使用Queue(队列),我没有看到它被贴出来。这类似于实现SkipLast()方法而无需进行不必要的迭代。这种方法也可以让你在任何数量的最后一项上这样做。
public static void ForEachAndKnowIfLast<T>(
this IEnumerable<T> source,
Action<T, bool> a,
int numLastItems = 1)
{
int bufferMax = numLastItems + 1;
var buffer = new Queue<T>(bufferMax);
foreach (T x in source)
{
buffer.Enqueue(x);
if (buffer.Count < bufferMax)
continue; //Until the buffer is full, just add to it.
a(buffer.Dequeue(), false);
}
foreach (T item in buffer)
a(item, true);
}
要调用它,你需要执行以下操作:
Model.Results.ForEachAndKnowIfLast(
(result, isLast) =>
{
//your logic goes here, using isLast to do things differently for last item(s).
});
还有更简单的方法吗?
Item last = null;
foreach (Item result in Model.Results)
{
// do something with each item
last = result;
}
//Here Item 'last' contains the last object that came in the last of foreach loop.
DoSomethingOnLastElement(last);
".Last()"对我不起作用,所以我不得不这样做:
Dictionary<string, string> iterativeDictionary = someOtherDictionary;
var index = 0;
iterativeDictionary.ForEach(kvp =>
index++ == iterativeDictionary.Count ?
/*it's the last item */ :
/*it's not the last item */
);