c++中struct和class关键字的区别在于，当在特定的复合数据类型上没有特定的说明符时，默认情况下struct或union是只考虑隐藏数据的公共关键字，而class是考虑隐藏程序代码或数据的私有关键字。总是有一些程序员为了数据而使用结构，为了代码而使用类。欲了解更多信息，请联系其他渠道。

类的成员默认为private。Struct的成员默认为public。除此之外，没有其他区别。还有这个问题。

规范里没有，没有。主要的区别在于程序员在2年内阅读你的代码时的期望。结构体通常被假定为POD。当您为定义对象以外的目的定义类型时，也会在模板元编程中使用结构。

你忘记了类和结构之间棘手的第二个区别。

引用标准(§11.2.2在c++ 98到c++ 11):

在没有访问说明符时 对于基类，假定为public 当声明派生类时 Struct和private在类声明为class时被假设。

为了完整起见，更广为人知的class和struct之间的区别定义在(11.2)中:

类定义的类的成员 关键字类private by 违约。定义的类的成员 使用关键字struct或union 默认为public。

另一个区别是:关键字class可以用来声明模板参数，而struct关键字不能这样使用。

引用c++ FAQ，

[7.8] What's the difference between the keywords struct and class? The members and base classes of a struct are public by default, while in class, they default to private. Note: you should make your base classes explicitly public, private, or protected, rather than relying on the defaults. Struct and class are otherwise functionally equivalent. OK, enough of that squeaky clean techno talk. Emotionally, most developers make a strong distinction between a class and a struct. A struct simply feels like an open pile of bits with very little in the way of encapsulation or functionality. A class feels like a living and responsible member of society with intelligent services, a strong encapsulation barrier, and a well defined interface. Since that's the connotation most people already have, you should probably use the struct keyword if you have a class that has very few methods and has public data (such things do exist in well designed systems!), but otherwise you should probably use the class keyword.

唯一的其他区别是类和结构的默认继承，不出意外，它们分别是私有和公共的。