在Javascript中伪造函数重载的最好方法是什么?
我知道在Javascript中不可能像在其他语言中那样重载函数。 如果我需要一个函数有两个使用foo(x)和foo(x,y,z)，这是最好的/首选的方式:
一开始就用不同的名字 使用可选参数，如y = y || 'default' 使用参数数量 检查参数类型 还是如何?
当前回答
我经常这样做:
C#:
public string CatStrings(string p1) {return p1;}
public string CatStrings(string p1, int p2) {return p1+p2.ToString();}
public string CatStrings(string p1, int p2, bool p3) {return p1+p2.ToString()+p3.ToString();}
CatStrings("one"); // result = one
CatStrings("one",2); // result = one2
CatStrings("one",2,true); // result = one2true
JavaScript相当于:
function CatStrings(p1, p2, p3)
{
var s = p1;
if(typeof p2 !== "undefined") {s += p2;}
if(typeof p3 !== "undefined") {s += p3;}
return s;
};
CatStrings("one"); // result = one
CatStrings("one",2); // result = one2
CatStrings("one",2,true); // result = one2true
This particular example is actually more elegant in javascript than C#. Parameters which are not specified are 'undefined' in javascript, which evaluates to false in an if statement. However, the function definition does not convey the information that p2 and p3 are optional. If you need a lot of overloading, jQuery has decided to use an object as the parameter, for example, jQuery.ajax(options). I agree with them that this is the most powerful and clearly documentable approach to overloading, but I rarely need more than one or two quick optional parameters.
编辑:根据Ian的建议更改IF测试
其他回答
我经常这样做:
C#:
public string CatStrings(string p1) {return p1;}
public string CatStrings(string p1, int p2) {return p1+p2.ToString();}
public string CatStrings(string p1, int p2, bool p3) {return p1+p2.ToString()+p3.ToString();}
CatStrings("one"); // result = one
CatStrings("one",2); // result = one2
CatStrings("one",2,true); // result = one2true
JavaScript相当于:
function CatStrings(p1, p2, p3)
{
var s = p1;
if(typeof p2 !== "undefined") {s += p2;}
if(typeof p3 !== "undefined") {s += p3;}
return s;
};
CatStrings("one"); // result = one
CatStrings("one",2); // result = one2
CatStrings("one",2,true); // result = one2true
This particular example is actually more elegant in javascript than C#. Parameters which are not specified are 'undefined' in javascript, which evaluates to false in an if statement. However, the function definition does not convey the information that p2 and p3 are optional. If you need a lot of overloading, jQuery has decided to use an object as the parameter, for example, jQuery.ajax(options). I agree with them that this is the most powerful and clearly documentable approach to overloading, but I rarely need more than one or two quick optional parameters.
编辑:根据Ian的建议更改IF测试
不是每个人都知道可以在函数签名中直接进行解构赋值。
得益于此，您可以轻松地定义非常灵活的方法签名，恕我直言，这比Java方法重载更优越。
例子:
const myFunction = (({a, b, c}) => {
console.log(a, b, c);
});
myFunction({a: 1, b: 2});
myFunction({a: 1, b: 2, c: 3});
您甚至不需要考虑参数的顺序，并且调用语句和目标方法签名之间具有命名一致性。
你也可以指定默认值:
const myFunction = (({a = 1, b = 2, c} = {}) => {
console.log(a, b, c);
});
JavaScript是一种无类型语言，我认为只有在参数数量方面重载方法/函数才有意义。因此，我建议检查参数是否已经定义:
myFunction = function(a, b, c) {
if (b === undefined && c === undefined ){
// do x...
}
else {
// do y...
}
};
截至2017年7月，以下是常见的技术。注意，我们还可以在函数中执行类型检查。
function f(...rest){ // rest is an array
console.log(rest.length);
for (v of rest) if (typeof(v)=="number")console.log(v);
}
f(1,2,3); // 3 1 2 3
因为这篇文章已经包含了很多不同的解决方案，所以我想再发一个。
function onlyUnique(value, index, self) {
return self.indexOf(value) === index;
}
function overload() {
var functions = arguments;
var nroffunctionsarguments = [arguments.length];
for (var i = 0; i < arguments.length; i++) {
nroffunctionsarguments[i] = arguments[i].length;
}
var unique = nroffunctionsarguments.filter(onlyUnique);
if (unique.length === arguments.length) {
return function () {
var indexoffunction = nroffunctionsarguments.indexOf(arguments.length);
return functions[indexoffunction].apply(this, arguments);
}
}
else throw new TypeError("There are multiple functions with the same number of parameters");
}
这可以使用如下所示:
var createVector = overload(
function (length) {
return { x: length / 1.414, y: length / 1.414 };
},
function (a, b) {
return { x: a, y: b };
},
function (a, b,c) {
return { x: a, y: b, z:c};
}
);
console.log(createVector(3, 4));
console.log(createVector(3, 4,5));
console.log(createVector(7.07));
这个解决方案不是完美的，但我只想演示它是如何做到的。
