比如,我有一个脚本,用这行代码调用:

./myscript -vfd ./foo/bar/someFile -o /fizz/someOtherFile

或者这个:

./myscript -v -f -d -o /fizz/someOtherFile ./foo/bar/someFile 

什么是公认的解析方式,以便在每种情况下(或两者的某种组合)$v、$f和$d都将设置为true,而$outFile将等于/fiz/someOtherFile?


当前回答

我发现在脚本中编写可移植解析的问题非常令人沮丧,因此我编写了Argbash-一个FOSS代码生成器,它可以为您的脚本生成参数解析代码,并且具有一些不错的功能:

https://argbash.io

其他回答

我想提供我的选项解析版本,它允许以下内容:

-s p1
--stage p1
-w somefolder
--workfolder somefolder
-sw p1 somefolder
-e=hello

也允许这样做(可能不需要):

-s--workfolder p1 somefolder
-se=hello p1
-swe=hello p1 somefolder

您必须在使用前决定是否在选项上使用=。这是为了保持代码干净。

while [[ $# > 0 ]]
do
    key="$1"
    while [[ ${key+x} ]]
    do
        case $key in
            -s*|--stage)
                STAGE="$2"
                shift # option has parameter
                ;;
            -w*|--workfolder)
                workfolder="$2"
                shift # option has parameter
                ;;
            -e=*)
                EXAMPLE="${key#*=}"
                break # option has been fully handled
                ;;
            *)
                # unknown option
                echo Unknown option: $key #1>&2
                exit 10 # either this: my preferred way to handle unknown options
                break # or this: do this to signal the option has been handled (if exit isn't used)
                ;;
        esac
        # prepare for next option in this key, if any
        [[ "$key" = -? || "$key" == --* ]] && unset key || key="${key/#-?/-}"
    done
    shift # option(s) fully processed, proceed to next input argument
done

我使用optget和optgets的组合来解析带或不带参数的短选项和长选项,甚至是非选项(不带-或-的选项):

# catch wrong options and move non-options to the end of the string
args=$(getopt -l "$opt_long" "$opt_short" "$@" 2> >(sed -e 's/^/stderr/g')) || echo -n "Error: " && echo "$args" | grep -oP "(?<=^stderr).*" && exit 1
mapfile -t args < <(xargs -n1 <<< "$(echo "$args" | sed -E "s/(--[^ ]+) /\1=/g")" )
set -- "${args[@]}"

# parse short and long options
while getopts "$opt_short-:" opt; do
  ...
done

# remove all parsed options from $@
shift $((OPTIND-1)

这样,我就可以使用$opt_verbose这样的变量访问所有选项,而非选项可以通过默认变量$1、$2等访问:

echo "help:$opt_help"
echo "file:$opt_file"
echo "verbose:$opt_verbose"
echo "long_only:$opt_long_only"
echo "short_only:$opt_s"
echo "path:$1"
echo "mail:$2"

其中一个主要特点是,我能够以完全随机的顺序传递所有选项和非选项:

#             $opt_file     $1        $2          $opt_... $opt_... $opt_...
# /demo.sh --file=file.txt /dir info@example.com -V -h --long_only=yes -s
help:1
file:file.txt
verbose:1
long_only:yes
short_only:1
path:/dir
mail:info@example.com

更多详情:https://stackoverflow.com/a/74275254/318765

在@brunobronosky的回答基础上,我添加了一个“预处理器”来处理一些常见的格式:

将--longopt=val展开为--longopt-val将-xyz展开为-x-y-z支持--表示标志的结束显示意外选项的错误小巧易读的选项开关

#!/bin/bash

# Report usage
usage() {
  echo "Usage:"
  echo "$(basename "$0") [options] [--] [file1, ...]"
}

invalid() {
  echo "ERROR: Unrecognized argument: $1" >&2
  usage
  exit 1
}

# Pre-process options to:
# - expand -xyz into -x -y -z
# - expand --longopt=arg into --longopt arg
ARGV=()
END_OF_OPT=
while [[ $# -gt 0 ]]; do
  arg="$1"; shift
  case "${END_OF_OPT}${arg}" in
    --) ARGV+=("$arg"); END_OF_OPT=1 ;;
    --*=*)ARGV+=("${arg%%=*}" "${arg#*=}") ;;
    --*) ARGV+=("$arg") ;;
    -*) for i in $(seq 2 ${#arg}); do ARGV+=("-${arg:i-1:1}"); done ;;
    *) ARGV+=("$arg") ;;
  esac
done

# Apply pre-processed options
set -- "${ARGV[@]}"

# Parse options
END_OF_OPT=
POSITIONAL=()
while [[ $# -gt 0 ]]; do
  case "${END_OF_OPT}${1}" in
    -h|--help)      usage; exit 0 ;;
    -p|--password)  shift; PASSWORD="$1" ;;
    -u|--username)  shift; USERNAME="$1" ;;
    -n|--name)      shift; names+=("$1") ;;
    -q|--quiet)     QUIET=1 ;;
    -C|--copy)      COPY=1 ;;
    -N|--notify)    NOTIFY=1 ;;
    --stdin)        READ_STDIN=1 ;;
    --)             END_OF_OPT=1 ;;
    -*)             invalid "$1" ;;
    *)              POSITIONAL+=("$1") ;;
  esac
  shift
done

# Restore positional parameters
set -- "${POSITIONAL[@]}"

简单易修改,参数可以按任意顺序排列。这可以修改为采用任何形式的参数(-a、-a、a等)。

for arg in "$@"
do
   key=$(echo $arg | cut -f1 -d=)`
   value=$(echo $arg | cut -f2 -d=)`
   case "$key" in
        name|-name)      read_name=$value;;
        id|-id)          read_id=$value;;
        *)               echo "I dont know what to do with this"
   ease
done

另一个Shell参数分析器(ASAP)

符合POSIX,无getopt

我受到@bronson相对简单的回答的启发,并试图改进它(不增加太多复杂性)。结果如下:

使用-n[arg]、-abn[arg],--name[arg]和--name=arg样式中的任意一种选项;参数可以按任何顺序出现,循环后$@中只留下位置参数;使用--强制将剩余的参数视为位置参数;检测无效选项和缺少的参数;不依赖于getopt或外部工具(一个功能使用简单的sed命令);便携式,紧凑,可读性强,具有独立功能。

# Convenience functions.
usage_error () { echo >&2 "$(basename $0):  $1"; exit 2; }
assert_argument () { test "$1" != "$EOL" || usage_error "$2 requires an argument"; }

# One loop, nothing more.
if [ "$#" != 0 ]; then
  EOL=$(printf '\1\3\3\7')
  set -- "$@" "$EOL"
  while [ "$1" != "$EOL" ]; do
    opt="$1"; shift
    case "$opt" in

      # Your options go here.
      -f|--flag) flag='true';;
      -n|--name) assert_argument "$1" "$opt"; name="$1"; shift;;

      # Arguments processing. You may remove any unneeded line after the 1st.
      -|''|[!-]*) set -- "$@" "$opt";;                                          # positional argument, rotate to the end
      --*=*)      set -- "${opt%%=*}" "${opt#*=}" "$@";;                        # convert '--name=arg' to '--name' 'arg'
      -[!-]?*)    set -- $(echo "${opt#-}" | sed 's/\(.\)/ -\1/g') "$@";;       # convert '-abc' to '-a' '-b' '-c'
      --)         while [ "$1" != "$EOL" ]; do set -- "$@" "$1"; shift; done;;  # process remaining arguments as positional
      -*)         usage_error "unknown option: '$opt'";;                        # catch misspelled options
      *)          usage_error "this should NEVER happen ($opt)";;               # sanity test for previous patterns

    esac
  done
  shift  # $EOL
fi

# Do something cool with "$@"... \o/

注:我知道。。。二进制模式为0x01030307的参数可能会破坏逻辑。但是,如果有人在命令行中传递这样的参数,他们应该得到它。