比如,我有一个脚本,用这行代码调用:
./myscript -vfd ./foo/bar/someFile -o /fizz/someOtherFile
或者这个:
./myscript -v -f -d -o /fizz/someOtherFile ./foo/bar/someFile
什么是公认的解析方式,以便在每种情况下(或两者的某种组合)$v、$f和$d都将设置为true,而$outFile将等于/fiz/someOtherFile?
比如,我有一个脚本,用这行代码调用:
./myscript -vfd ./foo/bar/someFile -o /fizz/someOtherFile
或者这个:
./myscript -v -f -d -o /fizz/someOtherFile ./foo/bar/someFile
什么是公认的解析方式,以便在每种情况下(或两者的某种组合)$v、$f和$d都将设置为true,而$outFile将等于/fiz/someOtherFile?
当前回答
我想提供我的选项解析版本,它允许以下内容:
-s p1
--stage p1
-w somefolder
--workfolder somefolder
-sw p1 somefolder
-e=hello
也允许这样做(可能不需要):
-s--workfolder p1 somefolder
-se=hello p1
-swe=hello p1 somefolder
您必须在使用前决定是否在选项上使用=。这是为了保持代码干净。
while [[ $# > 0 ]]
do
key="$1"
while [[ ${key+x} ]]
do
case $key in
-s*|--stage)
STAGE="$2"
shift # option has parameter
;;
-w*|--workfolder)
workfolder="$2"
shift # option has parameter
;;
-e=*)
EXAMPLE="${key#*=}"
break # option has been fully handled
;;
*)
# unknown option
echo Unknown option: $key #1>&2
exit 10 # either this: my preferred way to handle unknown options
break # or this: do this to signal the option has been handled (if exit isn't used)
;;
esac
# prepare for next option in this key, if any
[[ "$key" = -? || "$key" == --* ]] && unset key || key="${key/#-?/-}"
done
shift # option(s) fully processed, proceed to next input argument
done
其他回答
while [ "$#" -gt 0 ]; do
case "$1" in
-n) name="$2"; shift 2;;
-p) pidfile="$2"; shift 2;;
-l) logfile="$2"; shift 2;;
--name=*) name="${1#*=}"; shift 1;;
--pidfile=*) pidfile="${1#*=}"; shift 1;;
--logfile=*) logfile="${1#*=}"; shift 1;;
--name|--pidfile|--logfile) echo "$1 requires an argument" >&2; exit 1;;
-*) echo "unknown option: $1" >&2; exit 1;;
*) handle_argument "$1"; shift 1;;
esac
done
此解决方案:
句柄-n arg和--name=arg允许在末尾使用参数如果有任何拼写错误,则显示正常错误兼容,不使用抨击可读,不需要在循环中维护状态
我发现在脚本中编写可移植解析的问题非常令人沮丧,因此我编写了Argbash-一个FOSS代码生成器,它可以为您的脚本生成参数解析代码,并且具有一些不错的功能:
https://argbash.io
根据这里的其他答案,这是我的版本:
#!/bin/bash
set -e
function parse() {
for arg in "$@"; do # transform long options to short ones
shift
case "$arg" in
"--name") set -- "$@" "-n" ;;
"--verbose") set -- "$@" "-v" ;;
*) set -- "$@" "$arg"
esac
done
while getopts "n:v" optname # left to ":" are flags that expect a value, right to the ":" are flags that expect nothing
do
case "$optname" in
"n") name=${OPTARG} ;;
"v") verbose=true ;;
esac
done
shift "$((OPTIND-1))" # shift out all the already processed options
}
parse "$@"
echo "hello $name"
if [ ! -z $verbose ]; then echo 'nice to meet you!'; fi
用法:
$ ./parse.sh
hello
$ ./parse.sh -n YOUR_NAME
hello YOUR_NAME
$ ./parse.sh -n YOUR_NAME -v
hello YOUR_NAME
nice to meet you!
$ ./parse.sh -v -n YOUR_NAME
hello YOUR_NAME
nice to meet you!
$ ./parse.sh -v
hello
nice to meet you!
我使用前面的答案作为一个起点来整理我以前的即席参数解析。然后我重构了以下模板代码。它使用=或空格分隔的参数以及组合在一起的多个短参数来处理长参数和短参数。最后,它将所有非参数参数重新插入到$1,$2..变量中。
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# NOTICE: Uncomment if your script depends on bashisms.
#if [ -z "$BASH_VERSION" ]; then bash $0 $@ ; exit $? ; fi
echo "Before"
for i ; do echo - $i ; done
# Code template for parsing command line parameters using only portable shell
# code, while handling both long and short params, handling '-f file' and
# '-f=file' style param data and also capturing non-parameters to be inserted
# back into the shell positional parameters.
while [ -n "$1" ]; do
# Copy so we can modify it (can't modify $1)
OPT="$1"
# Detect argument termination
if [ x"$OPT" = x"--" ]; then
shift
for OPT ; do
REMAINS="$REMAINS \"$OPT\""
done
break
fi
# Parse current opt
while [ x"$OPT" != x"-" ] ; do
case "$OPT" in
# Handle --flag=value opts like this
-c=* | --config=* )
CONFIGFILE="${OPT#*=}"
shift
;;
# and --flag value opts like this
-c* | --config )
CONFIGFILE="$2"
shift
;;
-f* | --force )
FORCE=true
;;
-r* | --retry )
RETRY=true
;;
# Anything unknown is recorded for later
* )
REMAINS="$REMAINS \"$OPT\""
break
;;
esac
# Check for multiple short options
# NOTICE: be sure to update this pattern to match valid options
NEXTOPT="${OPT#-[cfr]}" # try removing single short opt
if [ x"$OPT" != x"$NEXTOPT" ] ; then
OPT="-$NEXTOPT" # multiple short opts, keep going
else
break # long form, exit inner loop
fi
done
# Done with that param. move to next
shift
done
# Set the non-parameters back into the positional parameters ($1 $2 ..)
eval set -- $REMAINS
echo -e "After: \n configfile='$CONFIGFILE' \n force='$FORCE' \n retry='$RETRY' \n remains='$REMAINS'"
for i ; do echo - $i ; done
另一个Shell参数分析器(ASAP)
符合POSIX,无getopt
我受到@bronson相对简单的回答的启发,并试图改进它(不增加太多复杂性)。结果如下:
使用-n[arg]、-abn[arg],--name[arg]和--name=arg样式中的任意一种选项;参数可以按任何顺序出现,循环后$@中只留下位置参数;使用--强制将剩余的参数视为位置参数;检测无效选项和缺少的参数;不依赖于getopt或外部工具(一个功能使用简单的sed命令);便携式,紧凑,可读性强,具有独立功能。
# Convenience functions.
usage_error () { echo >&2 "$(basename $0): $1"; exit 2; }
assert_argument () { test "$1" != "$EOL" || usage_error "$2 requires an argument"; }
# One loop, nothing more.
if [ "$#" != 0 ]; then
EOL=$(printf '\1\3\3\7')
set -- "$@" "$EOL"
while [ "$1" != "$EOL" ]; do
opt="$1"; shift
case "$opt" in
# Your options go here.
-f|--flag) flag='true';;
-n|--name) assert_argument "$1" "$opt"; name="$1"; shift;;
# Arguments processing. You may remove any unneeded line after the 1st.
-|''|[!-]*) set -- "$@" "$opt";; # positional argument, rotate to the end
--*=*) set -- "${opt%%=*}" "${opt#*=}" "$@";; # convert '--name=arg' to '--name' 'arg'
-[!-]?*) set -- $(echo "${opt#-}" | sed 's/\(.\)/ -\1/g') "$@";; # convert '-abc' to '-a' '-b' '-c'
--) while [ "$1" != "$EOL" ]; do set -- "$@" "$1"; shift; done;; # process remaining arguments as positional
-*) usage_error "unknown option: '$opt'";; # catch misspelled options
*) usage_error "this should NEVER happen ($opt)";; # sanity test for previous patterns
esac
done
shift # $EOL
fi
# Do something cool with "$@"... \o/
注:我知道。。。二进制模式为0x01030307的参数可能会破坏逻辑。但是,如果有人在命令行中传递这样的参数,他们应该得到它。