比如,我有一个脚本,用这行代码调用:

./myscript -vfd ./foo/bar/someFile -o /fizz/someOtherFile

或者这个:

./myscript -v -f -d -o /fizz/someOtherFile ./foo/bar/someFile 

什么是公认的解析方式,以便在每种情况下(或两者的某种组合)$v、$f和$d都将设置为true,而$outFile将等于/fiz/someOtherFile?


当前回答

我已经编写了一个bash助手来编写一个不错的bash工具

项目主页:https://gitlab.mbedsys.org/mbedsys/bashopts

例子:

#!/bin/bash -ei

# load the library
. bashopts.sh

# Enable backtrace dusplay on error
trap 'bashopts_exit_handle' ERR

# Initialize the library
bashopts_setup -n "$0" -d "This is myapp tool description displayed on help message" -s "$HOME/.config/myapprc"

# Declare the options
bashopts_declare -n first_name -l first -o f -d "First name" -t string -i -s -r
bashopts_declare -n last_name -l last -o l -d "Last name" -t string -i -s -r
bashopts_declare -n display_name -l display-name -t string -d "Display name" -e "\$first_name \$last_name"
bashopts_declare -n age -l number -d "Age" -t number
bashopts_declare -n email_list -t string -m add -l email -d "Email adress"

# Parse arguments
bashopts_parse_args "$@"

# Process argument
bashopts_process_args

将提供帮助:

NAME:
    ./example.sh - This is myapp tool description displayed on help message

USAGE:
    [options and commands] [-- [extra args]]

OPTIONS:
    -h,--help                          Display this help
    -n,--non-interactive true          Non interactive mode - [$bashopts_non_interactive] (type:boolean, default:false)
    -f,--first "John"                  First name - [$first_name] (type:string, default:"")
    -l,--last "Smith"                  Last name - [$last_name] (type:string, default:"")
    --display-name "John Smith"        Display name - [$display_name] (type:string, default:"$first_name $last_name")
    --number 0                         Age - [$age] (type:number, default:0)
    --email                            Email adress - [$email_list] (type:string, default:"")

享受:)

其他回答

部署.sh

#!/bin/bash

while [[ "$#" -gt 0 ]]; do
    case $1 in
        -t|--target) target="$2"; shift ;;
        -u|--uglify) uglify=1 ;;
        *) echo "Unknown parameter passed: $1"; exit 1 ;;
    esac
    shift
done

echo "Where to deploy: $target"
echo "Should uglify  : $uglify"

用法:

./deploy.sh -t dev -u

# OR:

./deploy.sh --target dev --uglify

getopt()/getopts()是一个很好的选项。从此处复制:

“getopt”的简单用法如下小脚本所示:

#!/bin/bash
echo "Before getopt"
for i
do
  echo $i
done
args=`getopt abc:d $*`
set -- $args
echo "After getopt"
for i
do
  echo "-->$i"
done

我们所说的是,-b、 -c或-d将被允许,但-c后面跟着一个参数(“c:”表示)。如果我们称之为“g”并尝试:

bash-2.05a$ ./g -abc foo
Before getopt
-abc
foo
After getopt
-->-a
-->-b
-->-c
-->foo
-->--

我们从两个参数开始“getopt”将选项和每个人都有自己的论点。它也是添加了“--”。

另一个Shell参数分析器(ASAP)

符合POSIX,无getopt

我受到@bronson相对简单的回答的启发,并试图改进它(不增加太多复杂性)。结果如下:

使用-n[arg]、-abn[arg],--name[arg]和--name=arg样式中的任意一种选项;参数可以按任何顺序出现,循环后$@中只留下位置参数;使用--强制将剩余的参数视为位置参数;检测无效选项和缺少的参数;不依赖于getopt或外部工具(一个功能使用简单的sed命令);便携式,紧凑,可读性强,具有独立功能。

# Convenience functions.
usage_error () { echo >&2 "$(basename $0):  $1"; exit 2; }
assert_argument () { test "$1" != "$EOL" || usage_error "$2 requires an argument"; }

# One loop, nothing more.
if [ "$#" != 0 ]; then
  EOL=$(printf '\1\3\3\7')
  set -- "$@" "$EOL"
  while [ "$1" != "$EOL" ]; do
    opt="$1"; shift
    case "$opt" in

      # Your options go here.
      -f|--flag) flag='true';;
      -n|--name) assert_argument "$1" "$opt"; name="$1"; shift;;

      # Arguments processing. You may remove any unneeded line after the 1st.
      -|''|[!-]*) set -- "$@" "$opt";;                                          # positional argument, rotate to the end
      --*=*)      set -- "${opt%%=*}" "${opt#*=}" "$@";;                        # convert '--name=arg' to '--name' 'arg'
      -[!-]?*)    set -- $(echo "${opt#-}" | sed 's/\(.\)/ -\1/g') "$@";;       # convert '-abc' to '-a' '-b' '-c'
      --)         while [ "$1" != "$EOL" ]; do set -- "$@" "$1"; shift; done;;  # process remaining arguments as positional
      -*)         usage_error "unknown option: '$opt'";;                        # catch misspelled options
      *)          usage_error "this should NEVER happen ($opt)";;               # sanity test for previous patterns

    esac
  done
  shift  # $EOL
fi

# Do something cool with "$@"... \o/

注:我知道。。。二进制模式为0x01030307的参数可能会破坏逻辑。但是,如果有人在命令行中传递这样的参数,他们应该得到它。

我最终实现了公认答案的dash(或/bin/sh)版本,基本上不使用数组:

while [[ $# -gt 0 ]]; do
    case "$1" in
    -v|--verbose) verbose=1; shift;;
    -o|--output) if [[ $# -gt 1 && "$2" != -* ]]; then
            file=$2; shift 2
        else
            echo "-o requires file-path" 1>&2; exit 1
        fi ;;
    --)
        while [[ $# -gt 0 ]]; do BACKUP="$BACKUP;$1"; shift; done
        break;;
    *)
        BACKUP="$BACKUP;$1"
        shift
        ;;
    esac
done
# Restore unused arguments.
while [ -n "$BACKUP" ] ; do
    [ ! -z "${BACKUP%%;*}" ] && set -- "$@" "${BACKUP%%;*}"
    [ "$BACKUP" = "${BACKUP/;/}" ] && break
    BACKUP="${BACKUP#*;}"
done

我认为这个很简单:

#!/bin/bash
#

readopt='getopts $opts opt;rc=$?;[ "$rc$opt" = "0?" ]&&exit 1;[ $rc = 0 ]||{ shift $[OPTIND-1];false; }'

opts=vfdo:

# Enumerating options
while eval "$readopt"
do
    echo OPT:$opt ${OPTARG+OPTARG:$OPTARG}
done

# Enumerating arguments
for arg
do
    echo ARG:$arg
done

调用示例:

./myscript -v -do /fizz/someOtherFile -f ./foo/bar/someFile
OPT:v 
OPT:d 
OPT:o OPTARG:/fizz/someOtherFile
OPT:f 
ARG:./foo/bar/someFile