我有一个这样的数据结构:

var someObject = {
    'part1' : {
        'name': 'Part 1',
        'size': '20',
        'qty' : '50'
    },
    'part2' : {
        'name': 'Part 2',
        'size': '15',
        'qty' : '60'
    },
    'part3' : [
        {
            'name': 'Part 3A',
            'size': '10',
            'qty' : '20'
        }, {
            'name': 'Part 3B',
            'size': '5',
            'qty' : '20'
        }, {
            'name': 'Part 3C',
            'size': '7.5',
            'qty' : '20'
        }
    ]
};

我想使用这些变量访问数据:

var part1name = "part1.name";
var part2quantity = "part2.qty";
var part3name1 = "part3[0].name";

part1name应该用someObject.part1.name的值填充,即“Part 1”。part2quantity也是一样,它的容量是60。

有没有办法实现这与纯javascript或JQuery?


当前回答

这可能永远都不会曝光……但不管怎样,它在这里。

将[]括号语法替换为。 继续前进。字符 删除空白字符串 找到路径(否则未定义)

(为了找到一个对象的路径,使用这个pathTo解决方案。)

// "one liner" (ES6) const deep_value = (obj, path) => path .replace(/\[|\]\.?/g, '.') .split('.') .filter(s => s) .reduce((acc, val) => acc && acc[val], obj); // ... and that's it. var someObject = { 'part1' : { 'name': 'Part 1', 'size': '20', 'qty' : '50' }, 'part2' : { 'name': 'Part 2', 'size': '15', 'qty' : '60' }, 'part3' : [ { 'name': 'Part 3A', 'size': '10', 'qty' : '20' } // ... ], 'pa[rt3' : [ { 'name': 'Part 3A', 'size': '10', 'qty' : '20' } // ... ] }; console.log(deep_value(someObject, "part1.name")); // Part 1 console.log(deep_value(someObject, "part2.qty")); // 60 console.log(deep_value(someObject, "part3[0].name")); // Part 3A console.log(deep_value(someObject, "part3[0].....name")); // Part 3A - invalid blank paths removed console.log(deep_value(someObject, "pa[rt3[0].name")); // undefined - name does not support square brackets

其他回答

AngularJS有$scope.$eval

在AngularJS中,我们可以使用$scope。$eval方法访问嵌套对象:

$scope.someObject = someObject;
console.log( $scope.$eval("someObject.part3[0].name") ); //Part 3A

有关更多信息,请参见

AngularJS $scope API引用- $eval

演示

angular.module("app",[]) .run(function($rootScope) { $rootScope.someObject = { 'part2' : { 'name': 'Part 2', 'size': '15', 'qty' : '60' }, 'part3' : [{ 'name': 'Part 3A', 'size': '10', 'qty' : '20' },{ name: 'Part 3B' }] }; console.log( "part3[0].name =", $rootScope.$eval("someObject.part3[0].name") ); }) <script src="//unpkg.com/angular/angular.js"></script> <body ng-app="app" </body>

从@Alnitak answer开始,我构建了这个源代码,它下载了一个实际的.JSON文件并对其进行处理,为每一步打印到控制台解释字符串,以及在传递错误键的情况下的更多细节:

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
  <head>
  <script>
function retrieveURL(url) {
        var client = new XMLHttpRequest();
        prefix = "https://cors-anywhere.herokuapp.com/"
        client.open('GET', prefix + url);
        client.responseType = 'text';
        client.onload = function() {
            response = client.response; // Load remote response.
            console.log("Response received.");
            parsedJSON  = JSON.parse(response);
            console.log(parsedJSON);
            console.log(JSONitemByPath(parsedJSON,"geometry[6].obs[3].latituade"));
            return response;
        };
        try {
            client.send();
        } catch(e) {
            console.log("NETWORK ERROR!");
            console.log(e);
        }
}



function JSONitemByPath(o, s) {
    structure = "";
    originalString = s;
    console.log("Received string: ", s);
    s = s.replace(/\[(\w+)\]/g, '.$1'); // convert indexes to properties
    console.log("Converted to   : ", s);
    s = s.replace(/^\./, '');           // strip a leading dot
    var a = s.split('.');

    console.log("Single keys to parse: ",a);

    for (var i = 0, n = a.length; i < n; ++i) {
        var k = a[i];
        if (k in o) {
            o = o[k];
            console.log("object." + structure +  a[i], o);
            structure +=  a[i] + ".";
        } else {
            console.log("ERROR: wrong path passed: ", originalString);
            console.log("       Last working level: ", structure.substr(0,structure.length-1));
            console.log("       Contents: ", o);
            console.log("       Available/passed key: ");
            Object.keys(o).forEach((prop)=> console.log("       "+prop +"/" + k));
            return;
        }
    }
    return o;
}


function main() {
    rawJSON = retrieveURL("http://haya2now.jp/data/data.json");
}

</script>
  </head>
  <body onload="main()">
  </body>
</html>

输出的例子:

Response received.
json-querier.html:17 {geometry: Array(7), error: Array(0), status: {…}}
json-querier.html:34 Received string:  geometry[6].obs[3].latituade
json-querier.html:36 Converted to   :  geometry.6.obs.3.latituade
json-querier.html:40 Single keys to parse:  (5) ["geometry", "6", "obs", "3", "latituade"]
json-querier.html:46 object.geometry (7) [{…}, {…}, {…}, {…}, {…}, {…}, {…}]
json-querier.html:46 object.geometry.6 {hayabusa2: {…}, earth: {…}, obs: Array(6), TT: 2458816.04973593, ryugu: {…}, …}
json-querier.html:46 object.geometry.6.obs (6) [{…}, {…}, {…}, {…}, {…}, {…}]
json-querier.html:46 object.geometry.6.obs.3 {longitude: 148.98, hayabusa2: {…}, sun: {…}, name: "DSS-43", latitude: -35.4, …}
json-querier.html:49 ERROR: wrong path passed:  geometry[6].obs[3].latituade
json-querier.html:50        Last working level:  geometry.6.obs.3
json-querier.html:51        Contents:  {longitude: 148.98, hayabusa2: {…}, sun: {…}, name: "DSS-43", latitude: -35.4, …}
json-querier.html:52        Available/passed key: 
json-querier.html:53        longitude/latituade
json-querier.html:53        hayabusa2/latituade
json-querier.html:53        sun/latituade
json-querier.html:53        name/latituade
json-querier.html:53        latitude/latituade
json-querier.html:53        altitude/latituade
json-querier.html:18 undefined

这个解决方案怎么样:

setJsonValue: function (json, field, val) {
  if (field !== undefined){
    try {
      eval("json." + field + " = val");
    }
    catch(e){
      ;
    }
  }  
}

这个,用来得到:

getJsonValue: function (json, field){
  var value = undefined;
  if (field !== undefined) {
    try {
      eval("value = json." + field);
    } 
    catch(e){
      ;
    }
  }
  return value;
};

可能有些人会认为它们不安全,但它们解析字符串的速度肯定要快得多。

现在lodash使用_支持这一点。get (obj,财产)。看到https://lodash.com/docs

文档中的例子:

var object = { 'a': [{ 'b': { 'c': 3 } }] };

_.get(object, 'a[0].b.c');
// → 3

_.get(object, ['a', '0', 'b', 'c']);
// → 3

_.get(object, 'a.b.c', 'default');
// → 'default'

在这里我提供了更多的方法,这些方法在很多方面看起来都更快:

选项1:Split string on。Or [Or] Or ' Or ",颠倒过来,跳过空项。

function getValue(path, origin) {
    if (origin === void 0 || origin === null) origin = self ? self : this;
    if (typeof path !== 'string') path = '' + path;
    var parts = path.split(/\[|\]|\.|'|"/g).reverse(), name; // (why reverse? because it's usually faster to pop off the end of an array)
    while (parts.length) { name=parts.pop(); if (name) origin=origin[name]; }
    return origin;
}

选项2(最快的,除了eval):低级字符扫描(没有regex/split/等等,只是一个快速字符扫描)。 注意:该命令不支持索引引用。

function getValue(path, origin) {
    if (origin === void 0 || origin === null) origin = self ? self : this;
    if (typeof path !== 'string') path = '' + path;
    var c = '', pc, i = 0, n = path.length, name = '';
    if (n) while (i<=n) ((c = path[i++]) == '.' || c == '[' || c == ']' || c == void 0) ? (name?(origin = origin[name], name = ''):(pc=='.'||pc=='['||pc==']'&&c==']'?i=n+2:void 0),pc=c) : name += c;
    if (i==n+2) throw "Invalid path: "+path;
    return origin;
} // (around 1,000,000+/- ops/sec)

选项3:(新:选项2扩展到支持引号-有点慢,但仍然很快)

function getValue(path, origin) {
    if (origin === void 0 || origin === null) origin = self ? self : this;
    if (typeof path !== 'string') path = '' + path;
    var c, pc, i = 0, n = path.length, name = '', q;
    while (i<=n)
        ((c = path[i++]) == '.' || c == '[' || c == ']' || c == "'" || c == '"' || c == void 0) ? (c==q&&path[i]==']'?q='':q?name+=c:name?(origin?origin=origin[name]:i=n+2,name='') : (pc=='['&&(c=='"'||c=="'")?q=c:pc=='.'||pc=='['||pc==']'&&c==']'||pc=='"'||pc=="'"?i=n+2:void 0), pc=c) : name += c;
    if (i==n+2 || name) throw "Invalid path: "+path;
    return origin;
}

JSPerf: http://jsperf.com/ways-to-dereference-a-delimited-property-string/3

"eval(...)" is still king though (performance wise that is). If you have property paths directly under your control, there shouldn't be any issues with using 'eval' (especially if speed is desired). If pulling property paths "over the wire" (on the line!? lol :P), then yes, use something else to be safe. Only an idiot would say to never use "eval" at all, as there ARE good reasons when to use it. Also, "It is used in Doug Crockford's JSON parser." If the input is safe, then no problems at all. Use the right tool for the right job, that's it.