The SELECT * might be ok if you actually needed all of the columns - but you should still list them all individually. You certainly shouldn't be selecting all rows from a table - even if the app & DB are on the same server or network. Transferring all of the rows will take time, especially as the number of rows grows. You should have at least a where clause filtering the results, and/or page the results to only select the subset of rows that need to be displayed. Several ORM tools exist depending on app language you are using to assist in querying and paging the subset of data you need. For example, in .NET Linq to SQL, Entity Framework, and nHibernate all will help you with this.

您应该只选择您需要的列。即使你需要所有的列，最好列出列名，这样sql server就不需要查询系统表中的列了。

此外，如果有人向表中添加列，应用程序可能会崩溃。您的程序也会得到它没有预料到的列，而且它可能不知道如何处理它们。

除此之外，如果表有一个二进制列，那么查询将更慢，并使用更多的网络资源。

如果你需要每一列，那么只需使用SELECT *，但记住，顺序可能会改变，所以当你消费的结果访问他们的名字，而不是通过索引。

我将忽略关于*需要如何获得列表的注释-解析和验证命名列的机会等于处理时间，如果不是更多的话。不要过早地优化;-)

select *是一件坏事，有四个主要原因:

The most significant practical reason is that it forces the user to magically know the order in which columns will be returned. It's better to be explicit, which also protects you against the table changing, which segues nicely into... If a column name you're using changes, it's better to catch it early (at the point of the SQL call) rather than when you're trying to use the column that no longer exists (or has had its name changed, etc.) Listing the column names makes your code far more self-documented, and so probably more readable. If you're transferring over a network (or even if you aren't), columns you don't need are just waste.

明确地定义列，因为SQL Server将不需要对列进行查找来拉出它们。如果定义了列，则SQL可以跳过该步骤。

我发现，如果其他开发人员可能会使用代码，或者数据库可能会更改，那么列出列名就特别重要，这样您就可以始终获得一致的数据。