为什么?!

如果你使用List，最简单的方法是使用for而不是foreach:

for (int i = 0 ; i < myList.Count ; i++)
{
    // Do something...
}

或者如果你想使用foreach:

foreach (string m in myList)
{
     // Do something...
}

你可以用它来知道每个循环的索引:

myList.indexOf(m)

我只是遇到了这个问题，但在我的情况下思考这个问题给出了最好的解决方案，与预期的解决方案无关。

It could be quite a common case, basically, I'm reading from one source list and creating objects based on them in a destination list, however, I have to check whether the source items are valid first and want to return the row of any error. At first-glance, I want to get the index into the enumerator of the object at the Current property, however, as I am copying these elements, I implicitly know the current index anyway from the current destination. Obviously it depends on your destination object, but for me it was a List, and most likely it will implement ICollection.

i.e.

var destinationList = new List<someObject>();
foreach (var item in itemList)
{
  var stringArray = item.Split(new char[] { ';', ',' }, StringSplitOptions.RemoveEmptyEntries);

  if (stringArray.Length != 2)
  {
    //use the destinationList Count property to give us the index into the stringArray list
    throw new Exception("Item at row " + (destinationList.Count + 1) + " has a problem.");
  }
  else
  {
    destinationList.Add(new someObject() { Prop1 = stringArray[0], Prop2 = stringArray[1]});
  }
}

我认为，虽然不总是适用，但常常足以值得一提。

不管怎样，关键是有时在你的逻辑中已经有了一个不明显的解决方案……

如果集合是列表，则可以使用list。IndexOf，如:

foreach (Object o in collection)
{
    // ...
    @collection.IndexOf(o)
}

我想更理论化地讨论这个问题(因为它已经有了足够多的实际答案)

.net为数据组(又称集合)提供了一个非常好的抽象模型。

在最顶端，也是最抽象的，你有一个IEnumerable它只是一组你可以枚举的数据。你如何枚举并不重要，重要的是你可以枚举一些数据。这个枚举是由一个完全不同的对象完成的，IEnumerator

这些接口定义如下:

//
// Summary:
//     Exposes an enumerator, which supports a simple iteration over a non-generic collection.
public interface IEnumerable
{
    //
    // Summary:
    //     Returns an enumerator that iterates through a collection.
    //
    // Returns:
    //     An System.Collections.IEnumerator object that can be used to iterate through
    //     the collection.
    IEnumerator GetEnumerator();
}

//
// Summary:
//     Supports a simple iteration over a non-generic collection.
public interface IEnumerator
{
    //
    // Summary:
    //     Gets the element in the collection at the current position of the enumerator.
    //
    // Returns:
    //     The element in the collection at the current position of the enumerator.
    object Current { get; }

    //
    // Summary:
    //     Advances the enumerator to the next element of the collection.
    //
    // Returns:
    //     true if the enumerator was successfully advanced to the next element; false if
    //     the enumerator has passed the end of the collection.
    //
    // Exceptions:
    //   T:System.InvalidOperationException:
    //     The collection was modified after the enumerator was created.
    bool MoveNext();
    //
    // Summary:
    //     Sets the enumerator to its initial position, which is before the first element
    //     in the collection.
    //
    // Exceptions:
    //   T:System.InvalidOperationException:
    //     The collection was modified after the enumerator was created.
    void Reset();
}

as you might have noticed, the IEnumerator interface doesn't "know" what an index is, it just knows what element it's currently pointing to, and how to move to the next one. now here is the trick: foreach considers every input collection an IEnumerable, even if it is a more concrete implementation like an IList<T> (which inherits from IEnumerable), it will only see the abstract interface IEnumerable. what foreach is actually doing, is calling GetEnumerator on the collection, and calling MoveNext until it returns false. so here is the problem, you want to define a concrete concept "Indices" on an abstract concept "Enumerables", the built in foreach construct doesn't give you that option, so your only way is to define it yourself, either by what you are doing originally (creating a counter manually) or just use an implementation of IEnumerator that recognizes indices AND implement a foreach construct that recognizes that custom implementation.

就我个人而言，我会创建一个这样的扩展方法

public static class Ext
{
    public static void FE<T>(this IEnumerable<T> l, Action<int, T> act)
    {
        int counter = 0;
        foreach (var item in l)
        {
            act(counter, item);
            counter++;
        }
    }
}

像这样使用它

var x = new List<string>() { "hello", "world" };
x.FE((ind, ele) =>
{
    Console.WriteLine($"{ind}: {ele}");
});

这也避免了在其他答案中看到的任何不必要的分配。

使用计数器变量并没有什么错。事实上，无论使用for、foreach while还是do，计数器变量都必须在某处声明并递增。

所以，如果你不确定你是否有一个适当索引的集合，请使用这个习语:

var i = 0;
foreach (var e in collection) {
   // Do stuff with 'e' and 'i'
   i++;
}

否则，如果你知道你的可索引集合是O(1)索引访问(它将是数组和可能List<T>(文档没有说)，但不一定对其他类型(如LinkedList)):

// Hope the JIT compiler optimises read of the 'Count' property!
for (var i = 0; i < collection.Count; i++) {
   var e = collection[i];
   // Do stuff with 'e' and 'i'
}

它应该永远不需要通过调用MoveNext()和询问Current来“手动”操作IEnumerator - foreach是为你省去了那个特别的麻烦…如果您需要跳过项目，只需在循环体中使用continue。

为了完整起见，根据你对索引的处理(上面的结构提供了足够的灵活性)，你可以使用Parallel LINQ:

// First, filter 'e' based on 'i',
// then apply an action to remaining 'e'
collection
    .AsParallel()
    .Where((e,i) => /* filter with e,i */)
    .ForAll(e => { /* use e, but don't modify it */ });

// Using 'e' and 'i', produce a new collection,
// where each element incorporates 'i'
collection
    .AsParallel()
    .Select((e, i) => new MyWrapper(e, i));

我们使用上面的AsParallel()，因为现在已经是2014年了，我们希望充分利用这些多核来加快速度。此外，对于“顺序”LINQ，你只能在List<T>和Array…上获得ForEach()扩展方法。而且不清楚使用它是否比简单的foreach更好，因为您仍然在运行单线程的更难看的语法。

这是我刚想到的解决这个问题的办法

原始代码:

int index=0;
foreach (var item in enumerable)
{
    blah(item, index); // some code that depends on the index
    index++;
}

更新代码

enumerable.ForEach((item, index) => blah(item, index));

扩展方法:

    public static IEnumerable<T> ForEach<T>(this IEnumerable<T> enumerable, Action<T, int> action)
    {
        var unit = new Unit(); // unit is a new type from the reactive framework (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/devlabs/ee794896.aspx) to represent a void, since in C# you can't return a void
        enumerable.Select((item, i) => 
            {
                action(item, i);
                return unit;
            }).ToList();

        return pSource;
    }