在MySQL中有一个很好的方法来复制SQL Server函数ROW_NUMBER()?
例如:
SELECT
col1, col2,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY col1, col2 ORDER BY col3 DESC) AS intRow
FROM Table1
然后,例如,我可以添加一个条件,将intRow限制为1,以获得每个(col1, col2)对的col3最高的单行。
在MySQL中有一个很好的方法来复制SQL Server函数ROW_NUMBER()?
例如:
SELECT
col1, col2,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY col1, col2 ORDER BY col3 DESC) AS intRow
FROM Table1
然后,例如,我可以添加一个条件,将intRow限制为1,以获得每个(col1, col2)对的col3最高的单行。
当前回答
我认为你可以在这里使用DENSE_RANK()函数。 例子:
select `score`, DENSE_RANK() OVER( ORDER BY score desc ) as `rank` from Scores;
https://www.mysqltutorial.org/mysql-window-functions/mysql-dense_rank-function/
其他回答
有点晚了,但也可能对那些寻找答案的人有帮助……
Between rows/row_number示例-可以在任何SQL中使用的递归查询:
WITH data(row_num, some_val) AS
(
SELECT 1 row_num, 1 some_val FROM any_table --dual in Oracle
UNION ALL
SELECT row_num+1, some_val+row_num FROM data WHERE row_num < 20 -- any number
)
SELECT * FROM data
WHERE row_num BETWEEN 5 AND 10
/
ROW_NUM SOME_VAL
-------------------
5 11
6 16
7 22
8 29
9 37
10 46
我总是遵循这个模式。给定这个表格:
+------+------+
| i | j |
+------+------+
| 1 | 11 |
| 1 | 12 |
| 1 | 13 |
| 2 | 21 |
| 2 | 22 |
| 2 | 23 |
| 3 | 31 |
| 3 | 32 |
| 3 | 33 |
| 4 | 14 |
+------+------+
你可以得到这样的结果:
+------+------+------------+
| i | j | row_number |
+------+------+------------+
| 1 | 11 | 1 |
| 1 | 12 | 2 |
| 1 | 13 | 3 |
| 2 | 21 | 1 |
| 2 | 22 | 2 |
| 2 | 23 | 3 |
| 3 | 31 | 1 |
| 3 | 32 | 2 |
| 3 | 33 | 3 |
| 4 | 14 | 1 |
+------+------+------------+
通过运行这个不需要定义任何变量的查询:
SELECT a.i, a.j, count(*) as row_number FROM test a
JOIN test b ON a.i = b.i AND a.j >= b.j
GROUP BY a.i, a.j
如果查询有GROUP BY语句,使用交叉连接和逗号的解决方案将不起作用。对于这种情况,您可以使用subselect:
SELECT (@row_number := @row_number + 1) AS rowNumber, res.*
FROM
(
SELECT SUM(r.amount)
FROM Results r
WHERE username = 1
GROUP BY r.amount
) res
CROSS JOIN (SELECT @row_number := 0) AS dummy
对于另一个列的划分,一种方法是由@abcdn描述的。但是,它的性能很低。我建议使用这段代码,它不需要连接表本身: 考虑同一张桌子。
你可以得到这样的分区:
set @row_num := 0;
set @j:= 0;
select IF(j= @j, @row_num := @row_num + 1, @row_num := 1) as row_num,
i, @j:= j as j
from tbl fh
order by j, i;
结果是这样的:
这样做的好处是我们不需要连接表本身
SELECT
@i:=@i+1 AS iterator,
t.*
FROM
tablename AS t,
(SELECT @i:=0) AS foo