我有一个公共异步无效Foo()方法，我想从同步方法调用。到目前为止，我从MSDN文档中看到的都是通过异步方法调用异步方法，但我的整个程序并不是用异步方法构建的。
这可能吗?
下面是一个从异步方法调用这些方法的例子: 演练:使用Async和Await访问Web (c#和Visual Basic)
现在我正在研究从sync方法调用这些async方法。
当前回答
然而，有一个很好的解决方案可以在(几乎:参见评论)任何情况下工作:一个特别的消息泵(SynchronizationContext)。
调用线程将按预期被阻塞，同时仍然确保从async函数调用的所有延续不会死锁，因为它们将被封送到运行在调用线程上的临时SynchronizationContext(消息泵)。
临时消息泵帮助器的代码:
using System;
using System.Collections.Concurrent;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Threading;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
namespace Microsoft.Threading
{
/// <summary>Provides a pump that supports running asynchronous methods on the current thread.</summary>
public static class AsyncPump
{
/// <summary>Runs the specified asynchronous method.</summary>
/// <param name="asyncMethod">The asynchronous method to execute.</param>
public static void Run(Action asyncMethod)
{
if (asyncMethod == null) throw new ArgumentNullException("asyncMethod");
var prevCtx = SynchronizationContext.Current;
try
{
// Establish the new context
var syncCtx = new SingleThreadSynchronizationContext(true);
SynchronizationContext.SetSynchronizationContext(syncCtx);
// Invoke the function
syncCtx.OperationStarted();
asyncMethod();
syncCtx.OperationCompleted();
// Pump continuations and propagate any exceptions
syncCtx.RunOnCurrentThread();
}
finally { SynchronizationContext.SetSynchronizationContext(prevCtx); }
}
/// <summary>Runs the specified asynchronous method.</summary>
/// <param name="asyncMethod">The asynchronous method to execute.</param>
public static void Run(Func<Task> asyncMethod)
{
if (asyncMethod == null) throw new ArgumentNullException("asyncMethod");
var prevCtx = SynchronizationContext.Current;
try
{
// Establish the new context
var syncCtx = new SingleThreadSynchronizationContext(false);
SynchronizationContext.SetSynchronizationContext(syncCtx);
// Invoke the function and alert the context to when it completes
var t = asyncMethod();
if (t == null) throw new InvalidOperationException("No task provided.");
t.ContinueWith(delegate { syncCtx.Complete(); }, TaskScheduler.Default);
// Pump continuations and propagate any exceptions
syncCtx.RunOnCurrentThread();
t.GetAwaiter().GetResult();
}
finally { SynchronizationContext.SetSynchronizationContext(prevCtx); }
}
/// <summary>Runs the specified asynchronous method.</summary>
/// <param name="asyncMethod">The asynchronous method to execute.</param>
public static T Run<T>(Func<Task<T>> asyncMethod)
{
if (asyncMethod == null) throw new ArgumentNullException("asyncMethod");
var prevCtx = SynchronizationContext.Current;
try
{
// Establish the new context
var syncCtx = new SingleThreadSynchronizationContext(false);
SynchronizationContext.SetSynchronizationContext(syncCtx);
// Invoke the function and alert the context to when it completes
var t = asyncMethod();
if (t == null) throw new InvalidOperationException("No task provided.");
t.ContinueWith(delegate { syncCtx.Complete(); }, TaskScheduler.Default);
// Pump continuations and propagate any exceptions
syncCtx.RunOnCurrentThread();
return t.GetAwaiter().GetResult();
}
finally { SynchronizationContext.SetSynchronizationContext(prevCtx); }
}
/// <summary>Provides a SynchronizationContext that's single-threaded.</summary>
private sealed class SingleThreadSynchronizationContext : SynchronizationContext
{
/// <summary>The queue of work items.</summary>
private readonly BlockingCollection<KeyValuePair<SendOrPostCallback, object>> m_queue =
new BlockingCollection<KeyValuePair<SendOrPostCallback, object>>();
/// <summary>The processing thread.</summary>
private readonly Thread m_thread = Thread.CurrentThread;
/// <summary>The number of outstanding operations.</summary>
private int m_operationCount = 0;
/// <summary>Whether to track operations m_operationCount.</summary>
private readonly bool m_trackOperations;
/// <summary>Initializes the context.</summary>
/// <param name="trackOperations">Whether to track operation count.</param>
internal SingleThreadSynchronizationContext(bool trackOperations)
{
m_trackOperations = trackOperations;
}
/// <summary>Dispatches an asynchronous message to the synchronization context.</summary>
/// <param name="d">The System.Threading.SendOrPostCallback delegate to call.</param>
/// <param name="state">The object passed to the delegate.</param>
public override void Post(SendOrPostCallback d, object state)
{
if (d == null) throw new ArgumentNullException("d");
m_queue.Add(new KeyValuePair<SendOrPostCallback, object>(d, state));
}
/// <summary>Not supported.</summary>
public override void Send(SendOrPostCallback d, object state)
{
throw new NotSupportedException("Synchronously sending is not supported.");
}
/// <summary>Runs an loop to process all queued work items.</summary>
public void RunOnCurrentThread()
{
foreach (var workItem in m_queue.GetConsumingEnumerable())
workItem.Key(workItem.Value);
}
/// <summary>Notifies the context that no more work will arrive.</summary>
public void Complete() { m_queue.CompleteAdding(); }
/// <summary>Invoked when an async operation is started.</summary>
public override void OperationStarted()
{
if (m_trackOperations)
Interlocked.Increment(ref m_operationCount);
}
/// <summary>Invoked when an async operation is completed.</summary>
public override void OperationCompleted()
{
if (m_trackOperations &&
Interlocked.Decrement(ref m_operationCount) == 0)
Complete();
}
}
}
}
用法:
AsyncPump.Run(() => FooAsync(...));
异步泵的更详细的描述可在这里。
其他回答
然而，有一个很好的解决方案可以在(几乎:参见评论)任何情况下工作:一个特别的消息泵(SynchronizationContext)。
调用线程将按预期被阻塞，同时仍然确保从async函数调用的所有延续不会死锁，因为它们将被封送到运行在调用线程上的临时SynchronizationContext(消息泵)。
临时消息泵帮助器的代码:
using System;
using System.Collections.Concurrent;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Threading;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
namespace Microsoft.Threading
{
/// <summary>Provides a pump that supports running asynchronous methods on the current thread.</summary>
public static class AsyncPump
{
/// <summary>Runs the specified asynchronous method.</summary>
/// <param name="asyncMethod">The asynchronous method to execute.</param>
public static void Run(Action asyncMethod)
{
if (asyncMethod == null) throw new ArgumentNullException("asyncMethod");
var prevCtx = SynchronizationContext.Current;
try
{
// Establish the new context
var syncCtx = new SingleThreadSynchronizationContext(true);
SynchronizationContext.SetSynchronizationContext(syncCtx);
// Invoke the function
syncCtx.OperationStarted();
asyncMethod();
syncCtx.OperationCompleted();
// Pump continuations and propagate any exceptions
syncCtx.RunOnCurrentThread();
}
finally { SynchronizationContext.SetSynchronizationContext(prevCtx); }
}
/// <summary>Runs the specified asynchronous method.</summary>
/// <param name="asyncMethod">The asynchronous method to execute.</param>
public static void Run(Func<Task> asyncMethod)
{
if (asyncMethod == null) throw new ArgumentNullException("asyncMethod");
var prevCtx = SynchronizationContext.Current;
try
{
// Establish the new context
var syncCtx = new SingleThreadSynchronizationContext(false);
SynchronizationContext.SetSynchronizationContext(syncCtx);
// Invoke the function and alert the context to when it completes
var t = asyncMethod();
if (t == null) throw new InvalidOperationException("No task provided.");
t.ContinueWith(delegate { syncCtx.Complete(); }, TaskScheduler.Default);
// Pump continuations and propagate any exceptions
syncCtx.RunOnCurrentThread();
t.GetAwaiter().GetResult();
}
finally { SynchronizationContext.SetSynchronizationContext(prevCtx); }
}
/// <summary>Runs the specified asynchronous method.</summary>
/// <param name="asyncMethod">The asynchronous method to execute.</param>
public static T Run<T>(Func<Task<T>> asyncMethod)
{
if (asyncMethod == null) throw new ArgumentNullException("asyncMethod");
var prevCtx = SynchronizationContext.Current;
try
{
// Establish the new context
var syncCtx = new SingleThreadSynchronizationContext(false);
SynchronizationContext.SetSynchronizationContext(syncCtx);
// Invoke the function and alert the context to when it completes
var t = asyncMethod();
if (t == null) throw new InvalidOperationException("No task provided.");
t.ContinueWith(delegate { syncCtx.Complete(); }, TaskScheduler.Default);
// Pump continuations and propagate any exceptions
syncCtx.RunOnCurrentThread();
return t.GetAwaiter().GetResult();
}
finally { SynchronizationContext.SetSynchronizationContext(prevCtx); }
}
/// <summary>Provides a SynchronizationContext that's single-threaded.</summary>
private sealed class SingleThreadSynchronizationContext : SynchronizationContext
{
/// <summary>The queue of work items.</summary>
private readonly BlockingCollection<KeyValuePair<SendOrPostCallback, object>> m_queue =
new BlockingCollection<KeyValuePair<SendOrPostCallback, object>>();
/// <summary>The processing thread.</summary>
private readonly Thread m_thread = Thread.CurrentThread;
/// <summary>The number of outstanding operations.</summary>
private int m_operationCount = 0;
/// <summary>Whether to track operations m_operationCount.</summary>
private readonly bool m_trackOperations;
/// <summary>Initializes the context.</summary>
/// <param name="trackOperations">Whether to track operation count.</param>
internal SingleThreadSynchronizationContext(bool trackOperations)
{
m_trackOperations = trackOperations;
}
/// <summary>Dispatches an asynchronous message to the synchronization context.</summary>
/// <param name="d">The System.Threading.SendOrPostCallback delegate to call.</param>
/// <param name="state">The object passed to the delegate.</param>
public override void Post(SendOrPostCallback d, object state)
{
if (d == null) throw new ArgumentNullException("d");
m_queue.Add(new KeyValuePair<SendOrPostCallback, object>(d, state));
}
/// <summary>Not supported.</summary>
public override void Send(SendOrPostCallback d, object state)
{
throw new NotSupportedException("Synchronously sending is not supported.");
}
/// <summary>Runs an loop to process all queued work items.</summary>
public void RunOnCurrentThread()
{
foreach (var workItem in m_queue.GetConsumingEnumerable())
workItem.Key(workItem.Value);
}
/// <summary>Notifies the context that no more work will arrive.</summary>
public void Complete() { m_queue.CompleteAdding(); }
/// <summary>Invoked when an async operation is started.</summary>
public override void OperationStarted()
{
if (m_trackOperations)
Interlocked.Increment(ref m_operationCount);
}
/// <summary>Invoked when an async operation is completed.</summary>
public override void OperationCompleted()
{
if (m_trackOperations &&
Interlocked.Decrement(ref m_operationCount) == 0)
Complete();
}
}
}
}
用法:
AsyncPump.Run(() => FooAsync(...));
异步泵的更详细的描述可在这里。
在尝试了几个小时不同的方法后，或多或少取得了成功，这就是我最终得到的结果。它在获取结果时不会以死锁结束，它还会获取并抛出原始异常，而不是被包装的异常。
private ReturnType RunSync()
{
var task = Task.Run(async () => await myMethodAsync(agency));
if (task.IsFaulted && task.Exception != null)
{
throw task.Exception;
}
return task.Result;
}
您可以从同步代码中调用任何异步方法，直到您需要等待它们，在这种情况下，它们也必须被标记为异步。
正如很多人在这里建议的那样，您可以在同步方法中对结果任务调用Wait()或Result，但最终会在该方法中进行阻塞调用，这在某种程度上违背了异步的目的。
如果你真的不能让你的方法异步，你不想锁定同步方法，那么你将不得不使用一个回调方法，把它作为参数传递给任务上的ContinueWith()方法。
微软构建了一个AsyncHelper(内部)类来作为同步运行Async。源代码如下所示:
internal static class AsyncHelper
{
private static readonly TaskFactory _myTaskFactory = new
TaskFactory(CancellationToken.None,
TaskCreationOptions.None,
TaskContinuationOptions.None,
TaskScheduler.Default);
public static TResult RunSync<TResult>(Func<Task<TResult>> func)
{
return AsyncHelper._myTaskFactory
.StartNew<Task<TResult>>(func)
.Unwrap<TResult>()
.GetAwaiter()
.GetResult();
}
public static void RunSync(Func<Task> func)
{
AsyncHelper._myTaskFactory
.StartNew<Task>(func)
.Unwrap()
.GetAwaiter()
.GetResult();
}
}
identity基类只有Async方法，为了将它们调用为Sync，有一些类的扩展方法看起来像这样(示例用法):
public static TUser FindById<TUser, TKey>(this UserManager<TUser, TKey> manager, TKey userId) where TUser : class, IUser<TKey> where TKey : IEquatable<TKey>
{
if (manager == null)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException("manager");
}
return AsyncHelper.RunSync<TUser>(() => manager.FindByIdAsync(userId));
}
public static bool IsInRole<TUser, TKey>(this UserManager<TUser, TKey> manager, TKey userId, string role) where TUser : class, IUser<TKey> where TKey : IEquatable<TKey>
{
if (manager == null)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException("manager");
}
return AsyncHelper.RunSync<bool>(() => manager.IsInRoleAsync(userId, role));
}
对于那些关心代码许可条款的人，这里有一个非常相似的代码链接(只是在线程上增加了对文化的支持)，其中有注释表明它是由微软授权的MIT。https://github.com/aspnet/AspNetIdentity/blob/master/src/Microsoft.AspNet.Identity.Core/AsyncHelper.cs
这与调用Task不一样吗?运行(async ()=> await AsyncFunc()).Result?说真的，微软现在不鼓励调用TaskFactory。StartNew，因为它们都是等效的，一个比另一个更可读。
绝对不是。
答案很简单
.Unwrap().GetAwaiter().GetResult() != .Result
首先
是任务。结果与.GetAwaiter.GetResult()?
其次，unwrap()会导致Task的设置不阻塞被包装的任务。
谁会问这个问题呢
这与调用Task不一样吗?运行(async ()=> await AsyncFunc()).GetAwaiter().GetResult()
那就得看情况了。
关于Task.Start()， Task.Run()和Task.Factory.StartNew()的使用
摘录:
的任务。Run使用taskcreateoptions。DenyChildAttach意思是子任务不能附加到父任务它使用TaskScheduler。默认值，这意味着在线程池中运行任务的线程将始终用于运行任务。 startnew使用TaskScheduler。Current表示当前线程的调度程序，它可能是TaskScheduler。违约但并非总是如此。
更多阅读:
指定同步上下文
ASP。NET Core SynchronizationContext
为了更加安全，像这样调用AsyncHelper不是更好吗?RunSync(async () => await AsyncMethod().ConfigureAwait(false));通过这种方式，我们告诉"内部"方法"请不要尝试同步到上层上下文并取消锁"
非常好的观点，就像大多数对象架构问题一样，这要视情况而定。
作为一个扩展方法，你想强迫绝对每个调用，还是让程序员使用该函数配置他们自己的异步调用?我可以看到call 3场景的用例;它很可能不是你在WPF中想要的，当然在大多数情况下是有意义的，但考虑到在ASP中没有上下文。Net Core如果你能保证它是ASP内部的。Net Core，那就无所谓了。
这些windows异步方法有一个漂亮的小方法叫做AsTask()。您可以使用它让方法作为任务返回本身，以便您可以手动调用Wait()。
例如，在Windows Phone 8 Silverlight应用程序中，您可以执行以下操作:
private void DeleteSynchronous(string path)
{
StorageFolder localFolder = Windows.Storage.ApplicationData.Current.LocalFolder;
Task t = localFolder.DeleteAsync(StorageDeleteOption.PermanentDelete).AsTask();
t.Wait();
}
private void FunctionThatNeedsToBeSynchronous()
{
// Do some work here
// ....
// Delete something in storage synchronously
DeleteSynchronous("pathGoesHere");
// Do other work here
// .....
}
希望这能有所帮助!
