有人能告诉我是否有一种方法可以用泛型将泛型类型参数T限制为:

Int16 Int32 Int64 UInt16 UInt32 UInt64

我知道哪里关键字,但不能找到只有这些类型的接口,

喜欢的东西:

static bool IntegerFunction<T>(T value) where T : INumeric 

当前回答

我创建了一个小库功能来解决这些问题:

而不是:

public T DifficultCalculation<T>(T a, T b)
{
    T result = a * b + a; // <== WILL NOT COMPILE!
    return result;
}
Console.WriteLine(DifficultCalculation(2, 3)); // Should result in 8.

你可以这样写:

public T DifficultCalculation<T>(Number<T> a, Number<T> b)
{
    Number<T> result = a * b + a;
    return (T)result;
}
Console.WriteLine(DifficultCalculation(2, 3)); // Results in 8.

你可以在这里找到源代码:https://codereview.stackexchange.com/questions/26022/improvement-requested-for-generic-calculator-and-generic-number

其他回答

不幸的是,在这种情况下,只能在where子句中指定struct。不能具体指定Int16、Int32等,这看起来确实很奇怪,但我相信,在决定不允许在where子句中使用值类型的基础上,有一些深层的实现原因。

我想唯一的解决方案是执行运行时检查,这不幸地阻止了在编译时拾取问题。大概是这样的:-

static bool IntegerFunction<T>(T value) where T : struct {
  if (typeof(T) != typeof(Int16)  &&
      typeof(T) != typeof(Int32)  &&
      typeof(T) != typeof(Int64)  &&
      typeof(T) != typeof(UInt16) &&
      typeof(T) != typeof(UInt32) &&
      typeof(T) != typeof(UInt64)) {
    throw new ArgumentException(
      string.Format("Type '{0}' is not valid.", typeof(T).ToString()));
  }

  // Rest of code...
}

我知道这有点难看,但至少提供了所需的约束条件。

我还将研究此实现可能的性能影响,也许有更快的方法。

. net数字基元类型不共享任何允许它们用于计算的公共接口。可以定义自己的接口(例如ISignedWholeNumber)来执行这样的操作,定义包含单个Int16、Int32等的结构并实现这些接口,然后有方法接受受ISignedWholeNumber约束的泛型类型,但是必须将数值转换为你的结构类型可能是一个麻烦。

An alternative approach would be to define static class Int64Converter<T> with a static property bool Available {get;}; and static delegates for Int64 GetInt64(T value), T FromInt64(Int64 value), bool TryStoreInt64(Int64 value, ref T dest). The class constructor could use be hard-coded to load delegates for known types, and possibly use Reflection to test whether type T implements methods with the proper names and signatures (in case it's something like a struct which contains an Int64 and represents a number, but has a custom ToString() method). This approach would lose the advantages associated with compile-time type-checking, but would still manage to avoid boxing operations and each type would only have to be "checked" once. After that, operations associated with that type would be replaced with a delegate dispatch.

话题老了,但对未来的读者来说:

这个特性与歧视联盟紧密相关,而歧视联盟目前还没有在c#中实现。我发现它的问题在这里:

https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/issues/113

这个问题仍然没有解决,并且已经计划在c# 10中推出新特性

所以我们仍然需要等待一段时间,但在释放之后,你可以这样做:

static bool IntegerFunction<T>(T value) where T : Int16 | Int32 | Int64 | ...

也许你能做的就是

static bool IntegerFunction<T>(T value) where T: struct

不确定你是否能做到以下几点

static bool IntegerFunction<T>(T value) where T: struct, IComparable
, IFormattable, IConvertible, IComparable<T>, IEquatable<T>

对于如此特定的内容,为什么不为每种类型设置重载呢?列表很短,而且可能占用更少的内存。

所有数值类型都是实现IComparable, IComparable<T>, IConvertible, IEquatable<T>, IFormattable的结构体。然而,DateTime也是如此。

所以这个泛型扩展方法是可能的:

public static bool IsNumeric<T>(this T value) where T : struct, IComparable, IComparable<T>, IConvertible, IEquatable<T>, IFormattable =>
  typeof(T) != typeof(DateTime);

但是对于实现这些接口的结构体,它将失败,例如:

public struct Foo : IComparable, IComparable<Foo>, IConvertible, IEquatable<Foo>, IFormattable { /* ... */ }

这个非泛型的替代方法性能较差,但保证可以工作:

public static bool IsNumeric(this Type type) =>
  type == typeof(sbyte) || type == typeof(byte) ||
  type == typeof(short) || type == typeof(ushort) ||
  type == typeof(int) || type == typeof(uint) ||
  type == typeof(long) || type == typeof(ulong) ||
  type == typeof(float) ||
  type == typeof(double) ||
  type == typeof(decimal);