如何在bash脚本中等待从该脚本派生的几个子进程完成，然后在任何子进程以code !=0结束时返回退出代码!=0?
简单的脚本:
#!/bin/bash
for i in `seq 0 9`; do
doCalculations $i &
done
wait
上面的脚本将等待所有10个子进程，但它总是给出退出状态0(参见help wait)。我如何修改这个脚本，以便它将发现衍生子进程的退出状态，并在任何子进程以code !=0结束时返回退出代码1 ?
有没有比收集子进程的pid、按顺序等待它们并求和退出状态更好的解决方案呢?
当前回答
set -e
fail () {
touch .failure
}
expect () {
wait
if [ -f .failure ]; then
rm -f .failure
exit 1
fi
}
sleep 2 || fail &
sleep 2 && false || fail &
sleep 2 || fail
expect
顶部的set -e使脚本在失败时停止。
如果任何子作业失败，Expect将返回1。
其他回答
陷阱是你的朋友。在很多系统中都可能出现ERR。您可以捕获EXIT，或在DEBUG上在每个命令之后执行一段代码。
这除了所有的标准信号。
edit
这是一次意外的登录错误的帐户，所以我没有看到示例的请求。
试试这里，用我的普通账户。
在bash脚本中处理异常
set -e
fail () {
touch .failure
}
expect () {
wait
if [ -f .failure ]; then
rm -f .failure
exit 1
fi
}
sleep 2 || fail &
sleep 2 && false || fail &
sleep 2 || fail
expect
顶部的set -e使脚本在失败时停止。
如果任何子作业失败，Expect将返回1。
如果你安装了GNU Parallel，你可以这样做:
# If doCalculations is a function
export -f doCalculations
seq 0 9 | parallel doCalculations {}
GNU Parallel会给你退出代码:
0 -所有作业运行无错误。 1-253 -部分作业失败。退出状态给出了失败作业的数量 254—超过253个作业失败。 255 -其他错误。
观看介绍视频了解更多信息:http://pi.dk/1
只需将结果存储在shell之外，例如在一个文件中。
#!/bin/bash
tmp=/tmp/results
: > $tmp #clean the file
for i in `seq 0 9`; do
(doCalculations $i; echo $i:$?>>$tmp)&
done #iterate
wait #wait until all ready
sort $tmp | grep -v ':0' #... handle as required
为了将此并行化…
for i in $(whatever_list) ; do
do_something $i
done
翻译成这样…
for i in $(whatever_list) ; do echo $i ; done | ## execute in parallel...
(
export -f do_something ## export functions (if needed)
export PATH ## export any variables that are required
xargs -I{} --max-procs 0 bash -c ' ## process in batches...
{
echo "processing {}" ## optional
do_something {}
}'
)
If an error occurs in one process, it won't interrupt the other processes, but it will result in a non-zero exit code from the sequence as a whole. Exporting functions and variables may or may not be necessary, in any particular case. You can set --max-procs based on how much parallelism you want (0 means "all at once"). GNU Parallel offers some additional features when used in place of xargs -- but it isn't always installed by default. The for loop isn't strictly necessary in this example since echo $i is basically just regenerating the output of $(whatever_list). I just think the use of the for keyword makes it a little easier to see what is going on. Bash string handling can be confusing -- I have found that using single quotes works best for wrapping non-trivial scripts. You can easily interrupt the entire operation (using ^C or similar), unlike the the more direct approach to Bash parallelism.
下面是一个简化的工作示例……
for i in {0..5} ; do echo $i ; done |xargs -I{} --max-procs 2 bash -c '
{
echo sleep {}
sleep 2s
}'
