这是对@Luca Tettamanti获得最多赞的答案的扩展，以创建一个完全可运行的示例。

这个答案让我很好奇:

n_procs是什么类型的变量，它包含什么?procs是什么类型的变量，它包含什么?有人能更新这个答案，使其可运行通过添加这些变量的定义吗?我不明白是怎么回事。

.．.还有:

当子流程完成时，如何从子流程获得返回代码(这是这个问题的整个关键)?

总之，我算出来了，这是一个完全可运行的例子。

注:

$! is how to obtain the PID (Process ID) of the last-executed sub-process. Running any command with the & after it, like cmd &, for example, causes it to run in the background as a parallel suprocess with the main process. myarray=() is how to create an array in bash. To learn a tiny bit more about the wait built-in command, see help wait. See also, and especially, the official Bash user manual on Job Control built-ins, such as wait and jobs, here: https://www.gnu.org/software/bash/manual/html_node/Job-Control-Builtins.html#index-wait.

完整的、可运行的程序:等待所有进程结束

multi_process_program.sh (from my eRCaGuy_hello_world repo):

#!/usr/bin/env bash


# This is a special sleep function which returns the number of seconds slept as
# the "error code" or return code" so that we can easily see that we are in
# fact actually obtaining the return code of each process as it finishes.
my_sleep() {
    seconds_to_sleep="$1"
    sleep "$seconds_to_sleep"
    return "$seconds_to_sleep"
}

# Create an array of whatever commands you want to run as subprocesses
procs=()  # bash array
procs+=("my_sleep 5")
procs+=("my_sleep 2")
procs+=("my_sleep 3")
procs+=("my_sleep 4")

num_procs=${#procs[@]}  # number of processes
echo "num_procs = $num_procs"

# run commands as subprocesses and store pids in an array
pids=()  # bash array
for (( i=0; i<"$num_procs"; i++ )); do
    echo "cmd = ${procs[$i]}"
    ${procs[$i]} &  # run the cmd as a subprocess
    # store pid of last subprocess started; see:
    # https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/30371/114401
    pids+=("$!")
    echo "    pid = ${pids[$i]}"
done

# OPTION 1 (comment this option out if using Option 2 below): wait for all pids
for pid in "${pids[@]}"; do
    wait "$pid"
    return_code="$?"
    echo "PID = $pid; return_code = $return_code"
done
echo "All $num_procs processes have ended."

通过运行chmod +x multi_process_program.sh将上面的文件修改为可执行文件，然后像这样运行:

time ./multi_process_program.sh 

样例输出。查看调用中的time命令的输出如何显示运行时间为5.084秒。我们还能够成功地从每个子流程检索返回代码。

eRCaGuy_hello_world/bash$ time ./multi_process_program.sh num_procs = 4 cmd = my_sleep 5 pid = 21694 cmd = my_sleep 2 pid = 21695 cmd = my_sleep 3 pid = 21697 cmd = my_sleep 4 pid = 21699 PID = 21694; return_code = 5 PID = 21695; return_code = 2 PID = 21697; return_code = 3 PID = 21699; return_code = 4 All 4 processes have ended. PID 21694 is done; return_code = 5; 3 PIDs remaining. PID 21695 is done; return_code = 2; 2 PIDs remaining. PID 21697 is done; return_code = 3; 1 PIDs remaining. PID 21699 is done; return_code = 4; 0 PIDs remaining. real 0m5.084s user 0m0.025s sys 0m0.061s

更进一步:确定每个单独进程结束的时间

如果您希望在每个进程结束时执行一些操作，而您不知道它们将在何时结束，那么可以在无限while循环中轮询以查看每个进程何时结束，然后执行您想要的任何操作。

只需注释掉上面的“OPTION 1”代码块，并将其替换为“OPTION 2”代码块:

# OR OPTION 2 (comment out Option 1 above if using Option 2): poll to detect
# when each process terminates, and print out when each process finishes!
while true; do
    for i in "${!pids[@]}"; do
        pid="${pids[$i]}"
        # echo "pid = $pid"  # debugging

        # See if PID is still running; see my answer here:
        # https://stackoverflow.com/a/71134379/4561887
        ps --pid "$pid" > /dev/null
        if [ "$?" -ne 0 ]; then
            # PID doesn't exist anymore, meaning it terminated

            # 1st, read its return code
            wait "$pid"
            return_code="$?"

            # 2nd, remove this PID from the `pids` array by `unset`ting the
            # element at this index; NB: due to how bash arrays work, this does
            # NOT actually remove this element from the array. Rather, it
            # removes its index from the `"${!pids[@]}"` list of indices,
            # adjusts the array count(`"${#pids[@]}"`) accordingly, and it sets
            # the value at this index to either a null value of some sort, or
            # an empty string (I'm not exactly sure).
            unset "pids[$i]"

            num_pids="${#pids[@]}"
            echo "PID $pid is done; return_code = $return_code;" \
                 "$num_pids PIDs remaining."
        fi
    done

    # exit the while loop if the `pids` array is empty
    if [ "${#pids[@]}" -eq 0 ]; then
        break
    fi

    # Do some small sleep here to keep your polling loop from sucking up
    # 100% of one of your CPUs unnecessarily. Sleeping allows other processes
    # to run during this time.
    sleep 0.1
done

完整程序的示例运行和输出，注释掉选项1，使用选项2:

eRCaGuy_hello_world / bash。美元/ multi_process_program.sh Num_procs = 4 CMD = my_sleep Pid = 22275 CMD = my_sleep Pid = 22276 CMD = my_sleep Pid = 22277 CMD = my_sleep Pid = 22280 PID 22276完成;Return_code = 2;剩余3个pid。 PID 22277完成;Return_code = 3;剩余2个pid。 PID 22280完成;Return_code = 4;剩余1个pid。 PID 22275完成;Return_code = 5;剩余的pid为0。

每一个PID XXXXX都是在进程结束后实时打印出来的!请注意，尽管sleep 5的进程(在本例中为PID 22275)是首先运行的，但它是最后完成的，并且我们在每个进程终止后成功检测到它。我们还成功地检测了每个返回代码，就像选项1一样。

其他参考资料:

*****+ [VERY HELPFUL] Get exit code of a background process - this answer taught me the key principle that (emphasis added): wait <n> waits until the process with PID is complete (it will block until the process completes, so you might not want to call this until you are sure the process is done), and then returns the exit code of the completed process. In other words, it helped me know that even after the process is complete, you can still call wait on it to get its return code! How to check if a process id (PID) exists my answer Remove an element from a Bash array - note that elements in a bash array aren't actually deleted, they are just "unset". See my comments in the code above for what that means. How to use the command-line executable true to make an infinite while loop in bash: https://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/bash-infinite-loop/

等待所有作业并返回最后一个失败作业的退出码。与上面的解决方案不同，这不需要保存pid，也不需要修改脚本的内部循环。走开，等着吧。

function wait_ex {
    # this waits for all jobs and returns the exit code of the last failing job
    ecode=0
    while true; do
        [ -z "$(jobs)" ] && break
        wait -n
        err="$?"
        [ "$err" != "0" ] && ecode="$err"
    done
    return $ecode
}

编辑:修正了脚本运行不存在的命令时可能被愚弄的错误。

我最近用过这个(感谢Alnitak):

#!/bin/bash
# activate child monitoring
set -o monitor

# locking subprocess
(while true; do sleep 0.001; done) &
pid=$!

# count, and kill when all done
c=0
function kill_on_count() {
    # you could kill on whatever criterion you wish for
    # I just counted to simulate bash's wait with no args
    [ $c -eq 9 ] && kill $pid
    c=$((c+1))
    echo -n '.' # async feedback (but you don't know which one)
}
trap "kill_on_count" CHLD

function save_status() {
    local i=$1;
    local rc=$2;
    # do whatever, and here you know which one stopped
    # but remember, you're called from a subshell
    # so vars have their values at fork time
}

# care must be taken not to spawn more than one child per loop
# e.g don't use `seq 0 9` here!
for i in {0..9}; do
    (doCalculations $i; save_status $i $?) &
done

# wait for locking subprocess to be killed
wait $pid
echo

从这里，我们可以很容易地推断，并拥有一个触发器(触摸文件，发送信号)并改变计数标准(计数触摸的文件，或其他)以响应该触发器。或者如果你只是想要'any'非零rc，只需从save_status中杀死锁。

我认为并行运行作业并检查状态的最直接方法是使用临时文件。已经有几个类似的答案(例如nietzsche -jou和mug896)。

#!/bin/bash
rm -f fail
for i in `seq 0 9`; do
  doCalculations $i || touch fail &
done
wait 
! [ -f fail ]

上面的代码不是线程安全的。如果你担心上面的代码会同时运行，最好使用一个更独特的文件名，比如fail.$$。最后一行是满足需求:“当任何子进程以code !=0结束时，返回退出代码1 ?”我又加了一条要求，要清理干净。这样写可能会更清楚:

#!/bin/bash
trap 'rm -f fail.$$' EXIT
for i in `seq 0 9`; do
  doCalculations $i || touch fail.$$ &
done
wait 
! [ -f fail.$$ ] 

下面是一个类似的代码片段，用于从多个作业收集结果:我创建一个临时目录，在一个单独的文件中描述所有子任务的输出，然后转储它们以供查看。这和问题不太匹配——我把它作为奖励扔进去:

#!/bin/bash
trap 'rm -fr $WORK' EXIT

WORK=/tmp/$$.work
mkdir -p $WORK
cd $WORK

for i in `seq 0 9`; do
  doCalculations $i >$i.result &
done
wait 
grep $ *  # display the results with filenames and contents

我几乎陷入了使用jobs -p来收集pid的陷阱，如果子进程已经退出，这将不起作用，如下面的脚本所示。我选择的解决方案是简单地调用-n N次，其中N是我有孩子的数量，这是我确定知道的。

#!/usr/bin/env bash

sleeper() {
    echo "Sleeper $1"
    sleep $2
    echo "Exiting $1"
    return $3
}

start_sleepers() {
    sleeper 1 1 0 &
    sleeper 2 2 $1 &
    sleeper 3 5 0 &
    sleeper 4 6 0 &
    sleep 4
}

echo "Using jobs"
start_sleepers 1

pids=( $(jobs -p) )

echo "PIDS: ${pids[*]}"

for pid in "${pids[@]}"; do
    wait "$pid"
    echo "Exit code $?"
done

echo "Clearing other children"
wait -n; echo "Exit code $?"
wait -n; echo "Exit code $?"

echo "Waiting for N processes"
start_sleepers 2

for ignored in $(seq 1 4); do
    wait -n
    echo "Exit code $?"
done

输出:

Using jobs
Sleeper 1
Sleeper 2
Sleeper 3
Sleeper 4
Exiting 1
Exiting 2
PIDS: 56496 56497
Exiting 3
Exit code 0
Exiting 4
Exit code 0
Clearing other children
Exit code 0
Exit code 1
Waiting for N processes
Sleeper 1
Sleeper 2
Sleeper 3
Sleeper 4
Exiting 1
Exiting 2
Exit code 0
Exit code 2
Exiting 3
Exit code 0
Exiting 4
Exit code 0

我不相信Bash的内置功能可以做到这一点。

你可以在child退出时得到通知:

#!/bin/sh
set -o monitor        # enable script job control
trap 'echo "child died"' CHLD

然而，在信号处理程序中没有明显的方法来获取子进程的退出状态。

获得子状态通常是底层POSIX api中的等待函数族的工作。不幸的是，Bash对此的支持是有限的——您可以等待一个特定的子进程(并获得其退出状态)，也可以等待所有子进程，但总是得到0结果。

似乎不可能做到的是waitpid(-1)的等效，它会阻塞直到任何子进程返回。