如何在bash脚本中等待从该脚本派生的几个子进程完成，然后在任何子进程以code !=0结束时返回退出代码!=0?
简单的脚本:
#!/bin/bash
for i in `seq 0 9`; do
doCalculations $i &
done
wait
上面的脚本将等待所有10个子进程，但它总是给出退出状态0(参见help wait)。我如何修改这个脚本，以便它将发现衍生子进程的退出状态，并在任何子进程以code !=0结束时返回退出代码1 ?
有没有比收集子进程的pid、按顺序等待它们并求和退出状态更好的解决方案呢?
当前回答
我真的很喜欢卢卡的回答，但需要它为zsh，所以这里是作为参考:
pids=()
# run processes and store pids in array
for i in $n_procs; do
./procs[${i}] &
pids+=($!)
done
# wait for all pids
for pid in ${pids[*]}; do
wait $pid
done```
其他回答
我已经尝试过了，并结合了其他例子中最好的部分。该脚本将在任何后台进程退出时执行checkpid函数，并输出退出状态而不诉诸轮询。
#!/bin/bash
set -o monitor
sleep 2 &
sleep 4 && exit 1 &
sleep 6 &
pids=`jobs -p`
checkpids() {
for pid in $pids; do
if kill -0 $pid 2>/dev/null; then
echo $pid is still alive.
elif wait $pid; then
echo $pid exited with zero exit status.
else
echo $pid exited with non-zero exit status.
fi
done
echo
}
trap checkpids CHLD
wait
为了将此并行化…
for i in $(whatever_list) ; do
do_something $i
done
翻译成这样…
for i in $(whatever_list) ; do echo $i ; done | ## execute in parallel...
(
export -f do_something ## export functions (if needed)
export PATH ## export any variables that are required
xargs -I{} --max-procs 0 bash -c ' ## process in batches...
{
echo "processing {}" ## optional
do_something {}
}'
)
If an error occurs in one process, it won't interrupt the other processes, but it will result in a non-zero exit code from the sequence as a whole. Exporting functions and variables may or may not be necessary, in any particular case. You can set --max-procs based on how much parallelism you want (0 means "all at once"). GNU Parallel offers some additional features when used in place of xargs -- but it isn't always installed by default. The for loop isn't strictly necessary in this example since echo $i is basically just regenerating the output of $(whatever_list). I just think the use of the for keyword makes it a little easier to see what is going on. Bash string handling can be confusing -- I have found that using single quotes works best for wrapping non-trivial scripts. You can easily interrupt the entire operation (using ^C or similar), unlike the the more direct approach to Bash parallelism.
下面是一个简化的工作示例……
for i in {0..5} ; do echo $i ; done |xargs -I{} --max-procs 2 bash -c '
{
echo sleep {}
sleep 2s
}'
http://jeremy.zawodny.com/blog/archives/010717.html:
#!/bin/bash
FAIL=0
echo "starting"
./sleeper 2 0 &
./sleeper 2 1 &
./sleeper 3 0 &
./sleeper 2 0 &
for job in `jobs -p`
do
echo $job
wait $job || let "FAIL+=1"
done
echo $FAIL
if [ "$FAIL" == "0" ];
then
echo "YAY!"
else
echo "FAIL! ($FAIL)"
fi
陷阱是你的朋友。在很多系统中都可能出现ERR。您可以捕获EXIT，或在DEBUG上在每个命令之后执行一段代码。
这除了所有的标准信号。
edit
这是一次意外的登录错误的帐户，所以我没有看到示例的请求。
试试这里，用我的普通账户。
在bash脚本中处理异常
我需要这个，但目标进程不是当前shell的子进程，在这种情况下，等待$PID不起作用。我确实找到了以下替代方案:
while [ -e /proc/$PID ]; do sleep 0.1 ; done
这依赖于procfs的存在，它可能不可用(例如Mac不提供它)。所以对于可移植性，你可以用这个代替:
while ps -p $PID >/dev/null ; do sleep 0.1 ; done
