如何在bash脚本中等待从该脚本派生的几个子进程完成，然后在任何子进程以code !=0结束时返回退出代码!=0?
简单的脚本:
#!/bin/bash
for i in `seq 0 9`; do
doCalculations $i &
done
wait
上面的脚本将等待所有10个子进程，但它总是给出退出状态0(参见help wait)。我如何修改这个脚本，以便它将发现衍生子进程的退出状态，并在任何子进程以code !=0结束时返回退出代码1 ?
有没有比收集子进程的pid、按顺序等待它们并求和退出状态更好的解决方案呢?
当前回答
正是为了这个目的，我写了一个bash函数:for。
注意::for不仅保留并返回失败函数的退出码，而且终止所有并行运行的实例。在这种情况下可能不需要。
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Wait for pids to terminate. If one pid exits with
# a non zero exit code, send the TERM signal to all
# processes and retain that exit code
#
# usage:
# :wait 123 32
function :wait(){
local pids=("$@")
[ ${#pids} -eq 0 ] && return $?
trap 'kill -INT "${pids[@]}" &>/dev/null || true; trap - INT' INT
trap 'kill -TERM "${pids[@]}" &>/dev/null || true; trap - RETURN TERM' RETURN TERM
for pid in "${pids[@]}"; do
wait "${pid}" || return $?
done
trap - INT RETURN TERM
}
# Run a function in parallel for each argument.
# Stop all instances if one exits with a non zero
# exit code
#
# usage:
# :for func 1 2 3
#
# env:
# FOR_PARALLEL: Max functions running in parallel
function :for(){
local f="${1}" && shift
local i=0
local pids=()
for arg in "$@"; do
( ${f} "${arg}" ) &
pids+=("$!")
if [ ! -z ${FOR_PARALLEL+x} ]; then
(( i=(i+1)%${FOR_PARALLEL} ))
if (( i==0 )) ;then
:wait "${pids[@]}" || return $?
pids=()
fi
fi
done && [ ${#pids} -eq 0 ] || :wait "${pids[@]}" || return $?
}
使用
for.sh:
#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -e
# import :for from gist: https://gist.github.com/Enteee/c8c11d46a95568be4d331ba58a702b62#file-for
# if you don't like curl imports, source the actual file here.
source <(curl -Ls https://gist.githubusercontent.com/Enteee/c8c11d46a95568be4d331ba58a702b62/raw/)
msg="You should see this three times"
:(){
i="${1}" && shift
echo "${msg}"
sleep 1
if [ "$i" == "1" ]; then sleep 1
elif [ "$i" == "2" ]; then false
elif [ "$i" == "3" ]; then
sleep 3
echo "You should never see this"
fi
} && :for : 1 2 3 || exit $?
echo "You should never see this"
$ ./for.sh; echo $?
You should see this three times
You should see this three times
You should see this three times
1
参考文献
[1]:博客 [2]:要点
其他回答
这是我目前想到的。我想了解如何在子进程终止时中断sleep命令，这样就不必根据使用情况调优WAITALL_DELAY。
waitall() { # PID...
## Wait for children to exit and indicate whether all exited with 0 status.
local errors=0
while :; do
debug "Processes remaining: $*"
for pid in "$@"; do
shift
if kill -0 "$pid" 2>/dev/null; then
debug "$pid is still alive."
set -- "$@" "$pid"
elif wait "$pid"; then
debug "$pid exited with zero exit status."
else
debug "$pid exited with non-zero exit status."
((++errors))
fi
done
(("$#" > 0)) || break
# TODO: how to interrupt this sleep when a child terminates?
sleep ${WAITALL_DELAY:-1}
done
((errors == 0))
}
debug() { echo "DEBUG: $*" >&2; }
pids=""
for t in 3 5 4; do
sleep "$t" &
pids="$pids $!"
done
waitall $pids
http://jeremy.zawodny.com/blog/archives/010717.html:
#!/bin/bash
FAIL=0
echo "starting"
./sleeper 2 0 &
./sleeper 2 1 &
./sleeper 3 0 &
./sleeper 2 0 &
for job in `jobs -p`
do
echo $job
wait $job || let "FAIL+=1"
done
echo $FAIL
if [ "$FAIL" == "0" ];
then
echo "YAY!"
else
echo "FAIL! ($FAIL)"
fi
这里已经有很多答案了，但我很惊讶似乎没有人建议使用数组……这就是我所做的——这可能在将来对一些人有用。
n=10 # run 10 jobs
c=0
PIDS=()
while true
my_function_or_command &
PID=$!
echo "Launched job as PID=$PID"
PIDS+=($PID)
(( c+=1 ))
# required to prevent any exit due to error
# caused by additional commands run which you
# may add when modifying this example
true
do
if (( c < n ))
then
continue
else
break
fi
done
# collect launched jobs
for pid in "${PIDS[@]}"
do
wait $pid || echo "failed job PID=$pid"
done
我需要这个，但目标进程不是当前shell的子进程，在这种情况下，等待$PID不起作用。我确实找到了以下替代方案:
while [ -e /proc/$PID ]; do sleep 0.1 ; done
这依赖于procfs的存在，它可能不可用(例如Mac不提供它)。所以对于可移植性，你可以用这个代替:
while ps -p $PID >/dev/null ; do sleep 0.1 ; done
等待所有作业并返回最后一个失败作业的退出码。与上面的解决方案不同，这不需要保存pid，也不需要修改脚本的内部循环。走开，等着吧。
function wait_ex {
# this waits for all jobs and returns the exit code of the last failing job
ecode=0
while true; do
[ -z "$(jobs)" ] && break
wait -n
err="$?"
[ "$err" != "0" ] && ecode="$err"
done
return $ecode
}
编辑:修正了脚本运行不存在的命令时可能被愚弄的错误。
