如何在bash脚本中等待从该脚本派生的几个子进程完成,然后在任何子进程以code !=0结束时返回退出代码!=0?
简单的脚本:
#!/bin/bash
for i in `seq 0 9`; do
doCalculations $i &
done
wait
上面的脚本将等待所有10个子进程,但它总是给出退出状态0(参见help wait)。我如何修改这个脚本,以便它将发现衍生子进程的退出状态,并在任何子进程以code !=0结束时返回退出代码1 ?
有没有比收集子进程的pid、按顺序等待它们并求和退出状态更好的解决方案呢?
我最近用过这个(感谢Alnitak):
#!/bin/bash
# activate child monitoring
set -o monitor
# locking subprocess
(while true; do sleep 0.001; done) &
pid=$!
# count, and kill when all done
c=0
function kill_on_count() {
# you could kill on whatever criterion you wish for
# I just counted to simulate bash's wait with no args
[ $c -eq 9 ] && kill $pid
c=$((c+1))
echo -n '.' # async feedback (but you don't know which one)
}
trap "kill_on_count" CHLD
function save_status() {
local i=$1;
local rc=$2;
# do whatever, and here you know which one stopped
# but remember, you're called from a subshell
# so vars have their values at fork time
}
# care must be taken not to spawn more than one child per loop
# e.g don't use `seq 0 9` here!
for i in {0..9}; do
(doCalculations $i; save_status $i $?) &
done
# wait for locking subprocess to be killed
wait $pid
echo
从这里,我们可以很容易地推断,并拥有一个触发器(触摸文件,发送信号)并改变计数标准(计数触摸的文件,或其他)以响应该触发器。或者如果你只是想要'any'非零rc,只需从save_status中杀死锁。
为了将此并行化…
for i in $(whatever_list) ; do
do_something $i
done
翻译成这样…
for i in $(whatever_list) ; do echo $i ; done | ## execute in parallel...
(
export -f do_something ## export functions (if needed)
export PATH ## export any variables that are required
xargs -I{} --max-procs 0 bash -c ' ## process in batches...
{
echo "processing {}" ## optional
do_something {}
}'
)
If an error occurs in one process, it won't interrupt the other processes, but it will result in a non-zero exit code from the sequence as a whole.
Exporting functions and variables may or may not be necessary, in any particular case.
You can set --max-procs based on how much parallelism you want (0 means "all at once").
GNU Parallel offers some additional features when used in place of xargs -- but it isn't always installed by default.
The for loop isn't strictly necessary in this example since echo $i is basically just regenerating the output of $(whatever_list). I just think the use of the for keyword makes it a little easier to see what is going on.
Bash string handling can be confusing -- I have found that using single quotes works best for wrapping non-trivial scripts.
You can easily interrupt the entire operation (using ^C or similar), unlike the the more direct approach to Bash parallelism.
下面是一个简化的工作示例……
for i in {0..5} ; do echo $i ; done |xargs -I{} --max-procs 2 bash -c '
{
echo sleep {}
sleep 2s
}'
我几乎陷入了使用jobs -p来收集pid的陷阱,如果子进程已经退出,这将不起作用,如下面的脚本所示。我选择的解决方案是简单地调用-n N次,其中N是我有孩子的数量,这是我确定知道的。
#!/usr/bin/env bash
sleeper() {
echo "Sleeper $1"
sleep $2
echo "Exiting $1"
return $3
}
start_sleepers() {
sleeper 1 1 0 &
sleeper 2 2 $1 &
sleeper 3 5 0 &
sleeper 4 6 0 &
sleep 4
}
echo "Using jobs"
start_sleepers 1
pids=( $(jobs -p) )
echo "PIDS: ${pids[*]}"
for pid in "${pids[@]}"; do
wait "$pid"
echo "Exit code $?"
done
echo "Clearing other children"
wait -n; echo "Exit code $?"
wait -n; echo "Exit code $?"
echo "Waiting for N processes"
start_sleepers 2
for ignored in $(seq 1 4); do
wait -n
echo "Exit code $?"
done
输出:
Using jobs
Sleeper 1
Sleeper 2
Sleeper 3
Sleeper 4
Exiting 1
Exiting 2
PIDS: 56496 56497
Exiting 3
Exit code 0
Exiting 4
Exit code 0
Clearing other children
Exit code 0
Exit code 1
Waiting for N processes
Sleeper 1
Sleeper 2
Sleeper 3
Sleeper 4
Exiting 1
Exiting 2
Exit code 0
Exit code 2
Exiting 3
Exit code 0
Exiting 4
Exit code 0