我也喜欢zzzeek的回答，但Andre是正确的，需要一个队列来防止乱码。我的运气还不错，但确实看到了乱码，这是意料之中的。实现它比我想象的要难，特别是在Windows上运行，在Windows上有一些关于全局变量和其他东西的额外限制(参见:如何在Windows上实现Python Multiprocessing ?)

但是，我终于让它工作了。这个例子可能并不完美，所以欢迎评论和建议。它也不支持设置格式化程序或根日志记录器以外的任何内容。基本上，您必须在每个池进程中用队列重新配置记录器，并在记录器上设置其他属性。

同样，欢迎提出任何关于如何使代码更好的建议。我当然还不知道所有的Python技巧:-)

import multiprocessing, logging, sys, re, os, StringIO, threading, time, Queue

class MultiProcessingLogHandler(logging.Handler):
    def __init__(self, handler, queue, child=False):
        logging.Handler.__init__(self)

        self._handler = handler
        self.queue = queue

        # we only want one of the loggers to be pulling from the queue.
        # If there is a way to do this without needing to be passed this
        # information, that would be great!
        if child == False:
            self.shutdown = False
            self.polltime = 1
            t = threading.Thread(target=self.receive)
            t.daemon = True
            t.start()

    def setFormatter(self, fmt):
        logging.Handler.setFormatter(self, fmt)
        self._handler.setFormatter(fmt)

    def receive(self):
        #print "receive on"
        while (self.shutdown == False) or (self.queue.empty() == False):
            # so we block for a short period of time so that we can
            # check for the shutdown cases.
            try:
                record = self.queue.get(True, self.polltime)
                self._handler.emit(record)
            except Queue.Empty, e:
                pass

    def send(self, s):
        # send just puts it in the queue for the server to retrieve
        self.queue.put(s)

    def _format_record(self, record):
        ei = record.exc_info
        if ei:
            dummy = self.format(record) # just to get traceback text into record.exc_text
            record.exc_info = None  # to avoid Unpickleable error

        return record

    def emit(self, record):
        try:
            s = self._format_record(record)
            self.send(s)
        except (KeyboardInterrupt, SystemExit):
            raise
        except:
            self.handleError(record)

    def close(self):
        time.sleep(self.polltime+1) # give some time for messages to enter the queue.
        self.shutdown = True
        time.sleep(self.polltime+1) # give some time for the server to time out and see the shutdown

    def __del__(self):
        self.close() # hopefully this aids in orderly shutdown when things are going poorly.

def f(x):
    # just a logging command...
    logging.critical('function number: ' + str(x))
    # to make some calls take longer than others, so the output is "jumbled" as real MP programs are.
    time.sleep(x % 3)

def initPool(queue, level):
    """
    This causes the logging module to be initialized with the necessary info
    in pool threads to work correctly.
    """
    logging.getLogger('').addHandler(MultiProcessingLogHandler(logging.StreamHandler(), queue, child=True))
    logging.getLogger('').setLevel(level)

if __name__ == '__main__':
    stream = StringIO.StringIO()
    logQueue = multiprocessing.Queue(100)
    handler= MultiProcessingLogHandler(logging.StreamHandler(stream), logQueue)
    logging.getLogger('').addHandler(handler)
    logging.getLogger('').setLevel(logging.DEBUG)

    logging.debug('starting main')

    # when bulding the pool on a Windows machine we also have to init the logger in all the instances with the queue and the level of logging.
    pool = multiprocessing.Pool(processes=10, initializer=initPool, initargs=[logQueue, logging.getLogger('').getEffectiveLevel()] ) # start worker processes
    pool.map(f, range(0,50))
    pool.close()

    logging.debug('done')
    logging.shutdown()
    print "stream output is:"
    print stream.getvalue()

下面是我简单的破解/变通方法…不是最全面的，但很容易修改，比我在写这篇文章之前找到的任何其他答案都更容易阅读和理解:

import logging
import multiprocessing

class FakeLogger(object):
    def __init__(self, q):
        self.q = q
    def info(self, item):
        self.q.put('INFO - {}'.format(item))
    def debug(self, item):
        self.q.put('DEBUG - {}'.format(item))
    def critical(self, item):
        self.q.put('CRITICAL - {}'.format(item))
    def warning(self, item):
        self.q.put('WARNING - {}'.format(item))

def some_other_func_that_gets_logger_and_logs(num):
    # notice the name get's discarded
    # of course you can easily add this to your FakeLogger class
    local_logger = logging.getLogger('local')
    local_logger.info('Hey I am logging this: {} and working on it to make this {}!'.format(num, num*2))
    local_logger.debug('hmm, something may need debugging here')
    return num*2

def func_to_parallelize(data_chunk):
    # unpack our args
    the_num, logger_q = data_chunk
    # since we're now in a new process, let's monkeypatch the logging module
    logging.getLogger = lambda name=None: FakeLogger(logger_q)
    # now do the actual work that happens to log stuff too
    new_num = some_other_func_that_gets_logger_and_logs(the_num)
    return (the_num, new_num)

if __name__ == '__main__':
    multiprocessing.freeze_support()
    m = multiprocessing.Manager()
    logger_q = m.Queue()
    # we have to pass our data to be parallel-processed
    # we also need to pass the Queue object so we can retrieve the logs
    parallelable_data = [(1, logger_q), (2, logger_q)]
    # set up a pool of processes so we can take advantage of multiple CPU cores
    pool_size = multiprocessing.cpu_count() * 2
    pool = multiprocessing.Pool(processes=pool_size, maxtasksperchild=4)
    worker_output = pool.map(func_to_parallelize, parallelable_data)
    pool.close() # no more tasks
    pool.join()  # wrap up current tasks
    # get the contents of our FakeLogger object
    while not logger_q.empty():
        print logger_q.get()
    print 'worker output contained: {}'.format(worker_output)

只需将日志记录器的实例发布到某个地方。这样，其他模块和客户端就可以使用您的API来获取记录器，而不必导入multiprocessing。

其中一个替代方案是将多处理日志写入一个已知文件，并注册一个atexit处理程序来加入这些进程，并在stderr上读取它;但是，您无法通过这种方式获得stderr上输出消息的实时流。

由于我们可以将多进程日志记录表示为多个发布者和一个订阅者(侦听器)，因此使用ZeroMQ实现PUB-SUB消息传递确实是一种选择。

此外，PyZMQ模块(ZMQ的Python绑定)实现了PUBHandler，这是通过ZMQ发布日志消息的对象。酒吧的套接字。

在web上有一个解决方案，使用PyZMQ和PUBHandler从分布式应用程序集中记录日志，可以很容易地在本地使用多个发布进程。

formatters = {
    logging.DEBUG: logging.Formatter("[%(name)s] %(message)s"),
    logging.INFO: logging.Formatter("[%(name)s] %(message)s"),
    logging.WARN: logging.Formatter("[%(name)s] %(message)s"),
    logging.ERROR: logging.Formatter("[%(name)s] %(message)s"),
    logging.CRITICAL: logging.Formatter("[%(name)s] %(message)s")
}

# This one will be used by publishing processes
class PUBLogger:
    def __init__(self, host, port=config.PUBSUB_LOGGER_PORT):
        self._logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
        self._logger.setLevel(logging.DEBUG)
        self.ctx = zmq.Context()
        self.pub = self.ctx.socket(zmq.PUB)
        self.pub.connect('tcp://{0}:{1}'.format(socket.gethostbyname(host), port))
        self._handler = PUBHandler(self.pub)
        self._handler.formatters = formatters
        self._logger.addHandler(self._handler)

    @property
    def logger(self):
        return self._logger

# This one will be used by listener process
class SUBLogger:
    def __init__(self, ip, output_dir="", port=config.PUBSUB_LOGGER_PORT):
        self.output_dir = output_dir
        self._logger = logging.getLogger()
        self._logger.setLevel(logging.DEBUG)

        self.ctx = zmq.Context()
        self._sub = self.ctx.socket(zmq.SUB)
        self._sub.bind('tcp://*:{1}'.format(ip, port))
        self._sub.setsockopt(zmq.SUBSCRIBE, "")

        handler = handlers.RotatingFileHandler(os.path.join(output_dir, "client_debug.log"), "w", 100 * 1024 * 1024, 10)
        handler.setLevel(logging.DEBUG)
        formatter = logging.Formatter("%(asctime)s;%(levelname)s - %(message)s")
        handler.setFormatter(formatter)
        self._logger.addHandler(handler)

  @property
  def sub(self):
      return self._sub

  @property
  def logger(self):
      return self._logger

#  And that's the way we actually run things:

# Listener process will forever listen on SUB socket for incoming messages
def run_sub_logger(ip, event):
    sub_logger = SUBLogger(ip)
    while not event.is_set():
        try:
            topic, message = sub_logger.sub.recv_multipart(flags=zmq.NOBLOCK)
            log_msg = getattr(logging, topic.lower())
            log_msg(message)
        except zmq.ZMQError as zmq_error:
            if zmq_error.errno == zmq.EAGAIN:
                pass


# Publisher processes loggers should be initialized as follows:

class Publisher:
    def __init__(self, stop_event, proc_id):
        self.stop_event = stop_event
        self.proc_id = proc_id
        self._logger = pub_logger.PUBLogger('127.0.0.1').logger

     def run(self):
         self._logger.info("{0} - Sending message".format(proc_id))

def run_worker(event, proc_id):
    worker = Publisher(event, proc_id)
    worker.run()

# Starting subscriber process so we won't loose publisher's messages
sub_logger_process = Process(target=run_sub_logger,
                                 args=('127.0.0.1'), stop_event,))
sub_logger_process.start()

#Starting publisher processes
for i in range(MAX_WORKERS_PER_CLIENT):
    processes.append(Process(target=run_worker,
                                 args=(stop_event, i,)))
for p in processes:
    p.start()

通过使用处理程序，当前所有解决方案都与日志记录配置过于耦合。我的解决方案具有以下架构和功能:

您可以使用任何想要的日志记录配置 日志记录在守护进程线程中完成 使用上下文管理器安全关闭守护进程 与日志线程的通信是由多进程完成的。队列 在子进程中，日志记录。Logger(和已经定义的实例)被打补丁以将所有记录发送到队列 新:在发送到队列之前格式化回溯和消息，以防止pickle错误

带有使用示例和输出的代码可以在以下Gist中找到:https://gist.github.com/schlamar/7003737