我希望使用shell脚本调用长形式和短形式的命令行选项。
我知道可以使用getopts，但是像在Perl中一样，我不能用shell做同样的事情。
关于如何做到这一点的任何想法，这样我就可以使用如下选项:
./shell.sh --copyfile abc.pl /tmp/
./shell.sh -c abc.pl /tmp/
在上面，这两个命令对我的shell意味着同样的事情，但使用getopts，我还不能实现这些?
当前回答
一个简单的DIY，只获得长名称的参数:
Use:
$ ./test-args.sh --a1 a1 --a2 "a 2" --a3 --a4= --a5=a5 --a6="a 6"
a1 = "a1"
a2 = "a 2"
a3 = "TRUE"
a4 = ""
a5 = "a5"
a6 = "a 6"
a7 = ""
脚本:
#!/bin/bash
function main() {
ARGS=`getArgs "$@"`
a1=`echo "$ARGS" | getNamedArg a1`
a2=`echo "$ARGS" | getNamedArg a2`
a3=`echo "$ARGS" | getNamedArg a3`
a4=`echo "$ARGS" | getNamedArg a4`
a5=`echo "$ARGS" | getNamedArg a5`
a6=`echo "$ARGS" | getNamedArg a6`
a7=`echo "$ARGS" | getNamedArg a7`
echo "a1 = \"$a1\""
echo "a2 = \"$a2\""
echo "a3 = \"$a3\""
echo "a4 = \"$a4\""
echo "a5 = \"$a5\""
echo "a6 = \"$a6\""
echo "a7 = \"$a7\""
exit 0
}
function getArgs() {
for arg in "$@"; do
echo "$arg"
done
}
function getNamedArg() {
ARG_NAME=$1
sed --regexp-extended --quiet --expression="
s/^--$ARG_NAME=(.*)\$/\1/p # Get arguments in format '--arg=value': [s]ubstitute '--arg=value' by 'value', and [p]rint
/^--$ARG_NAME\$/ { # Get arguments in format '--arg value' ou '--arg'
n # - [n]ext, because in this format, if value exists, it will be the next argument
/^--/! p # - If next doesn't starts with '--', it is the value of the actual argument
/^--/ { # - If next do starts with '--', it is the next argument and the actual argument is a boolean one
# Then just repla[c]ed by TRUE
c TRUE
}
}
"
}
main "$@"
其他回答
内置OS X (BSD) getopt不支持长选项，但GNU版本支持:brew install GNU -getopt。然后，类似于:cp /usr/local/Cellar/gnu-getopt/1.1.6/bin/getopt /usr/local/bin/gnu-getopt。
公认的答案很好地指出了bash内置getopts的所有缺点。答案以:
因此，虽然可以编写更多的代码来解决长选项支持不足的问题，但工作量要大得多，并且在一定程度上违背了使用getopt解析器来简化代码的目的。
尽管我原则上同意这种说法，但我觉得我们在各种脚本中实现这个特性的次数证明，我们应该花一些精力来创建一个“标准化”的、经过良好测试的解决方案。
因此，我通过在纯bash中实现getopts_long“升级”了内置在getopts中的bash，没有外部依赖。该函数的使用与内置的getopts 100%兼容。
通过在脚本中包含getopts_long(在GitHub上托管)，可以简单地实现原始问题的答案:
source "${PATH_TO}/getopts_long.bash"
while getopts_long ':c: copyfile:' OPTKEY; do
case ${OPTKEY} in
'c'|'copyfile')
echo 'file supplied -- ${OPTARG}'
;;
'?')
echo "INVALID OPTION -- ${OPTARG}" >&2
exit 1
;;
':')
echo "MISSING ARGUMENT for option -- ${OPTARG}" >&2
exit 1
;;
*)
echo "Misconfigured OPTSPEC or uncaught option -- ${OPTKEY}" >&2
exit 1
;;
esac
done
shift $(( OPTIND - 1 ))
[[ "${1}" == "--" ]] && shift
使用带有短/长选项和参数的getopts
适用于所有组合，例如:
Foobar -f——bar Foobar——foo -b Foobar -bf -bar - Foobar foobar -fbFBAshorty——bar -FB——arguments=longhorn foobar -fA "text shorty" -B——arguments="text longhorn" bash foobar -F—barfoo sh foobar - b——foobar -… bash ./foobar -F——bar
本例中的一些声明
Options=$@
Optnum=$#
sfoo='no '
sbar='no '
sfoobar='no '
sbarfoo='no '
sarguments='no '
sARG=empty
lfoo='no '
lbar='no '
lfoobar='no '
lbarfoo='no '
larguments='no '
lARG=empty
Usage函数看起来如何
function _usage()
{
###### U S A G E : Help and ERROR ######
cat <<EOF
foobar $Options
$*
Usage: foobar <[options]>
Options:
-b --bar Set bar to yes ($foo)
-f --foo Set foo to yes ($bart)
-h --help Show this message
-A --arguments=... Set arguments to yes ($arguments) AND get ARGUMENT ($ARG)
-B --barfoo Set barfoo to yes ($barfoo)
-F --foobar Set foobar to yes ($foobar)
EOF
}
[ $# = 0 ] && _usage " >>>>>>>> no options given "
具有长/短标志和长参数的getop
while getopts ':bfh-A:BF' OPTION ; do
case "$OPTION" in
b ) sbar=yes ;;
f ) sfoo=yes ;;
h ) _usage ;;
A ) sarguments=yes;sARG="$OPTARG" ;;
B ) sbarfoo=yes ;;
F ) sfoobar=yes ;;
- ) [ $OPTIND -ge 1 ] && optind=$(expr $OPTIND - 1 ) || optind=$OPTIND
eval OPTION="\$$optind"
OPTARG=$(echo $OPTION | cut -d'=' -f2)
OPTION=$(echo $OPTION | cut -d'=' -f1)
case $OPTION in
--foo ) lfoo=yes ;;
--bar ) lbar=yes ;;
--foobar ) lfoobar=yes ;;
--barfoo ) lbarfoo=yes ;;
--help ) _usage ;;
--arguments ) larguments=yes;lARG="$OPTARG" ;;
* ) _usage " Long: >>>>>>>> invalid options (long) " ;;
esac
OPTIND=1
shift
;;
? ) _usage "Short: >>>>>>>> invalid options (short) " ;;
esac
done
输出
##################################################################
echo "----------------------------------------------------------"
echo "RESULT short-foo : $sfoo long-foo : $lfoo"
echo "RESULT short-bar : $sbar long-bar : $lbar"
echo "RESULT short-foobar : $sfoobar long-foobar : $lfoobar"
echo "RESULT short-barfoo : $sbarfoo long-barfoo : $lbarfoo"
echo "RESULT short-arguments: $sarguments with Argument = \"$sARG\" long-arguments: $larguments and $lARG"
将上述内容组合成一个内聚脚本
#!/bin/bash
# foobar: getopts with short and long options AND arguments
function _cleanup ()
{
unset -f _usage _cleanup ; return 0
}
## Clear out nested functions on exit
trap _cleanup INT EXIT RETURN
###### some declarations for this example ######
Options=$@
Optnum=$#
sfoo='no '
sbar='no '
sfoobar='no '
sbarfoo='no '
sarguments='no '
sARG=empty
lfoo='no '
lbar='no '
lfoobar='no '
lbarfoo='no '
larguments='no '
lARG=empty
function _usage()
{
###### U S A G E : Help and ERROR ######
cat <<EOF
foobar $Options
$*
Usage: foobar <[options]>
Options:
-b --bar Set bar to yes ($foo)
-f --foo Set foo to yes ($bart)
-h --help Show this message
-A --arguments=... Set arguments to yes ($arguments) AND get ARGUMENT ($ARG)
-B --barfoo Set barfoo to yes ($barfoo)
-F --foobar Set foobar to yes ($foobar)
EOF
}
[ $# = 0 ] && _usage " >>>>>>>> no options given "
##################################################################
####### "getopts" with: short options AND long options #######
####### AND short/long arguments #######
while getopts ':bfh-A:BF' OPTION ; do
case "$OPTION" in
b ) sbar=yes ;;
f ) sfoo=yes ;;
h ) _usage ;;
A ) sarguments=yes;sARG="$OPTARG" ;;
B ) sbarfoo=yes ;;
F ) sfoobar=yes ;;
- ) [ $OPTIND -ge 1 ] && optind=$(expr $OPTIND - 1 ) || optind=$OPTIND
eval OPTION="\$$optind"
OPTARG=$(echo $OPTION | cut -d'=' -f2)
OPTION=$(echo $OPTION | cut -d'=' -f1)
case $OPTION in
--foo ) lfoo=yes ;;
--bar ) lbar=yes ;;
--foobar ) lfoobar=yes ;;
--barfoo ) lbarfoo=yes ;;
--help ) _usage ;;
--arguments ) larguments=yes;lARG="$OPTARG" ;;
* ) _usage " Long: >>>>>>>> invalid options (long) " ;;
esac
OPTIND=1
shift
;;
? ) _usage "Short: >>>>>>>> invalid options (short) " ;;
esac
done
我只是偶尔写一些shell脚本，但没有实践经验，所以任何反馈都很感激。
使用@Arvid Requate提出的策略，我们注意到一些用户错误。忘记包含值的用户会意外地将下一个选项的名称视为值:
./getopts_test.sh --loglevel= --toc=TRUE
将导致"loglevel"的值被视为"——toc=TRUE"。这可以 被避免的。
我从http://mwiki.wooledge.org/BashFAQ/035关于手动解析的讨论中改编了一些关于检查CLI用户错误的想法。我在处理"-"和"——"参数时插入了错误检查。
然后我开始摆弄语法，所以这里的任何错误都是我的错，而不是原始作者的错。
我的方法可以帮助那些喜欢输入带等号或不带等号的长字符的用户。也就是说，它对“——loglevel 9”的响应应该与“——loglevel=9”的响应相同。在——/space方法中，不可能确定用户是否忘记了一个参数，因此需要进行一些猜测。
如果用户使用长/等号格式(——opt=)，则=后的空格会触发错误，因为没有提供参数。 如果user有长/空格参数(——opt)，如果后面没有参数(命令结束)或参数以破折号开头，该脚本将导致失败。
In case you are starting out on this, there is an interesting difference between "--opt=value" and "--opt value" formats. With the equal sign, the command line argument is seen as "opt=value" and the work to handle that is string parsing, to separate at the "=". In contrast, with "--opt value", the name of the argument is "opt" and we have the challenge of getting the next value supplied in the command line. That's where @Arvid Requate used ${!OPTIND}, the indirect reference. I still don't understand that, well, at all, and comments in BashFAQ seem to warn against that style (http://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashFAQ/006). BTW, I don't think previous poster's comments about importance of OPTIND=$(( $OPTIND + 1 )) are correct. I mean to say, I see no harm from omitting it.
在该脚本的最新版本中，flag -v表示详细打印输出。
将其保存在一个名为“cli-5.sh”的文件中，使其可执行，其中任何一个都将以预期的方式工作或失败
./cli-5.sh -v --loglevel=44 --toc TRUE
./cli-5.sh -v --loglevel=44 --toc=TRUE
./cli-5.sh --loglevel 7
./cli-5.sh --loglevel=8
./cli-5.sh -l9
./cli-5.sh --toc FALSE --loglevel=77
./cli-5.sh --toc=FALSE --loglevel=77
./cli-5.sh -l99 -t yyy
./cli-5.sh -l 99 -t yyy
下面是对用户intpu进行错误检查的示例输出
$ ./cli-5.sh --toc --loglevel=77
ERROR: toc value must not have dash at beginning
$ ./cli-5.sh --toc= --loglevel=77
ERROR: value for toc undefined
您应该考虑打开-v，因为它会打印OPTIND和OPTARG的内部内容
#/usr/bin/env bash
## Paul Johnson
## 20171016
##
## Combines ideas from
## https://stackoverflow.com/questions/402377/using-getopts-in-bash-shell-script-to-get-long-and-short-command-line-options
## by @Arvid Requate, and http://mwiki.wooledge.org/BashFAQ/035
# What I don't understand yet:
# In @Arvid REquate's answer, we have
# val="${!OPTIND}"; OPTIND=$(( $OPTIND + 1 ))
# this works, but I don't understand it!
die() {
printf '%s\n' "$1" >&2
exit 1
}
printparse(){
if [ ${VERBOSE} -gt 0 ]; then
printf 'Parse: %s%s%s\n' "$1" "$2" "$3" >&2;
fi
}
showme(){
if [ ${VERBOSE} -gt 0 ]; then
printf 'VERBOSE: %s\n' "$1" >&2;
fi
}
VERBOSE=0
loglevel=0
toc="TRUE"
optspec=":vhl:t:-:"
while getopts "$optspec" OPTCHAR; do
showme "OPTARG: ${OPTARG[*]}"
showme "OPTIND: ${OPTIND[*]}"
case "${OPTCHAR}" in
-)
case "${OPTARG}" in
loglevel) #argument has no equal sign
opt=${OPTARG}
val="${!OPTIND}"
## check value. If negative, assume user forgot value
showme "OPTIND is {$OPTIND} {!OPTIND} has value \"${!OPTIND}\""
if [[ "$val" == -* ]]; then
die "ERROR: $opt value must not have dash at beginning"
fi
## OPTIND=$(( $OPTIND + 1 )) # CAUTION! no effect?
printparse "--${OPTARG}" " " "${val}"
loglevel="${val}"
shift
;;
loglevel=*) #argument has equal sign
opt=${OPTARG%=*}
val=${OPTARG#*=}
if [ "${OPTARG#*=}" ]; then
printparse "--${opt}" "=" "${val}"
loglevel="${val}"
## shift CAUTION don't shift this, fails othewise
else
die "ERROR: $opt value must be supplied"
fi
;;
toc) #argument has no equal sign
opt=${OPTARG}
val="${!OPTIND}"
## check value. If negative, assume user forgot value
showme "OPTIND is {$OPTIND} {!OPTIND} has value \"${!OPTIND}\""
if [[ "$val" == -* ]]; then
die "ERROR: $opt value must not have dash at beginning"
fi
## OPTIND=$(( $OPTIND + 1 )) #??
printparse "--${opt}" " " "${val}"
toc="${val}"
shift
;;
toc=*) #argument has equal sign
opt=${OPTARG%=*}
val=${OPTARG#*=}
if [ "${OPTARG#*=}" ]; then
toc=${val}
printparse "--$opt" " -> " "$toc"
##shift ## NO! dont shift this
else
die "ERROR: value for $opt undefined"
fi
;;
help)
echo "usage: $0 [-v] [--loglevel[=]<value>] [--toc[=]<TRUE,FALSE>]" >&2
exit 2
;;
*)
if [ "$OPTERR" = 1 ] && [ "${optspec:0:1}" != ":" ]; then
echo "Unknown option --${OPTARG}" >&2
fi
;;
esac;;
h|-\?|--help)
## must rewrite this for all of the arguments
echo "usage: $0 [-v] [--loglevel[=]<value>] [--toc[=]<TRUE,FALSE>]" >&2
exit 2
;;
l)
loglevel=${OPTARG}
printparse "-l" " " "${loglevel}"
;;
t)
toc=${OPTARG}
;;
v)
VERBOSE=1
;;
*)
if [ "$OPTERR" != 1 ] || [ "${optspec:0:1}" = ":" ]; then
echo "Non-option argument: '-${OPTARG}'" >&2
fi
;;
esac
done
echo "
After Parsing values
"
echo "loglevel $loglevel"
echo "toc $toc"
下面你可以找到bash中复杂选项解析的几种不同方法: http://mywiki.wooledge.org/ComplexOptionParsing
我确实创建了下面的一个，而且我认为它很好，因为它的代码最少 多头和空头选择都有效。使用这种方法，长选项也可以有多个参数。
#!/bin/bash
# Uses bash extensions. Not portable as written.
declare -A longoptspec
longoptspec=( [loglevel]=1 ) #use associative array to declare how many arguments a long option expects, in this case we declare that loglevel expects/has one argument, long options that aren't listed i n this way will have zero arguments by default
optspec=":h-:"
while getopts "$optspec" opt; do
while true; do
case "${opt}" in
-) #OPTARG is name-of-long-option or name-of-long-option=value
if [[ "${OPTARG}" =~ .*=.* ]] #with this --key=value format only one argument is possible
then
opt=${OPTARG/=*/}
OPTARG=${OPTARG#*=}
((OPTIND--))
else #with this --key value1 value2 format multiple arguments are possible
opt="$OPTARG"
OPTARG=(${@:OPTIND:$((longoptspec[$opt]))})
fi
((OPTIND+=longoptspec[$opt]))
continue #now that opt/OPTARG are set we can process them as if getopts would've given us long options
;;
loglevel)
loglevel=$OPTARG
;;
h|help)
echo "usage: $0 [--loglevel[=]<value>]" >&2
exit 2
;;
esac
break; done
done
# End of file
