for循环中的++i和i++有区别吗?这仅仅是语法问题吗?
当前回答
正如这段代码所示(请参阅注释中拆解的MSIL), c# 3编译器在for循环中不区分i++和++i。如果取i++或++i的值,肯定会有区别(这是在visual Studio 2008 / Release Build中编译的):
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
namespace PreOrPostIncrement
{
class Program
{
static int SomethingToIncrement;
static void Main(string[] args)
{
PreIncrement(1000);
PostIncrement(1000);
Console.WriteLine("SomethingToIncrement={0}", SomethingToIncrement);
}
static void PreIncrement(int count)
{
/*
.method private hidebysig static void PreIncrement(int32 count) cil managed
{
// Code size 25 (0x19)
.maxstack 2
.locals init ([0] int32 i)
IL_0000: ldc.i4.0
IL_0001: stloc.0
IL_0002: br.s IL_0014
IL_0004: ldsfld int32 PreOrPostIncrement.Program::SomethingToIncrement
IL_0009: ldc.i4.1
IL_000a: add
IL_000b: stsfld int32 PreOrPostIncrement.Program::SomethingToIncrement
IL_0010: ldloc.0
IL_0011: ldc.i4.1
IL_0012: add
IL_0013: stloc.0
IL_0014: ldloc.0
IL_0015: ldarg.0
IL_0016: blt.s IL_0004
IL_0018: ret
} // end of method Program::PreIncrement
*/
for (int i = 0; i < count; ++i)
{
++SomethingToIncrement;
}
}
static void PostIncrement(int count)
{
/*
.method private hidebysig static void PostIncrement(int32 count) cil managed
{
// Code size 25 (0x19)
.maxstack 2
.locals init ([0] int32 i)
IL_0000: ldc.i4.0
IL_0001: stloc.0
IL_0002: br.s IL_0014
IL_0004: ldsfld int32 PreOrPostIncrement.Program::SomethingToIncrement
IL_0009: ldc.i4.1
IL_000a: add
IL_000b: stsfld int32 PreOrPostIncrement.Program::SomethingToIncrement
IL_0010: ldloc.0
IL_0011: ldc.i4.1
IL_0012: add
IL_0013: stloc.0
IL_0014: ldloc.0
IL_0015: ldarg.0
IL_0016: blt.s IL_0004
IL_0018: ret
} // end of method Program::PostIncrement
*/
for (int i = 0; i < count; i++)
{
SomethingToIncrement++;
}
}
}
}
其他回答
关于++i和i++,不仅仅是循环和性能差异。++i返回一个l值,i++返回一个r值。基于此,可以对(++i)执行许多操作,但不能对(i++)执行许多操作。
1- It is illegal to take the address of post increment result. Compiler won't even allow you.
2- Only constant references to post increment can exist, i.e., of the form const T&.
3- You cannot apply another post increment or decrement to the result of i++, i.e., there is no such thing as I++++. This would be parsed as ( i ++ ) ++ which is illegal.
4- When overloading pre-/post-increment and decrement operators, programmers are encouraged to define post- increment/decrement operators like:
T& operator ++ ( )
{
// logical increment
return *this;
}
const T operator ++ ( int )
{
T temp( *this );
++*this;
return temp;
}
我很奇怪为什么这么多人把for循环中的增量表达式写成i++。
在for循环中,当第三个组件是一个简单的增量语句时,例如
for (i=0; i<x; i++)
or
for (i=0; i<x; ++i)
结果执行没有区别。
是的,有。区别在于返回值。"++i"的返回值将是加i之后的值。"i++"的返回值将是加i之前的值。这意味着代码看起来像下面这样:
int a = 0;
int b = ++a; // a is incremented and the result after incrementing is saved to b.
int c = a++; // a is incremented again and the result before incremening is saved to c.
因此,a等于2,b和c都等于1。
我可以像这样重写代码:
int a = 0;
// ++a;
a = a + 1; // incrementing first.
b = a; // setting second.
// a++;
c = a; // setting first.
a = a + 1; // incrementing second.
在这两种情况下,'i'将加1。
但是当你在表达式中使用它时,就有区别了,例如:
int i = 1;
int a = ++i;
// i is incremented by one and then assigned to a.
// Both i and a are now 2.
int b = i++;
// i is assigned to b and then incremented by one.
// b is now 2, and i is now 3
既然你问了循环中的区别,我猜你的意思是
for(int i=0; i<10; i++)
...;
在这种情况下,你在大多数语言中没有什么不同:无论你写i++还是++i,循环的行为都是一样的。在c++中,你可以编写自己版本的++操作符,如果i是用户定义的类型(例如,你自己的类),你可以为它们定义不同的含义。
上面的原因并不重要,因为您没有使用i++的值。另一件事是你做的时候
for(int i=0, a = 0; i<10; a = i++)
...;
现在,有一个区别,因为正如其他人指出的那样,i++意味着增量,但求值到之前的值,但++i意味着增量,但求值到i(因此它将求值到新值)。在上面的例子中,a被赋给i之前的值,而i是递增的。