for循环中的++i和i++有区别吗?这仅仅是语法问题吗?
当前回答
在javascript中由于以下原因i++可能更好使用:
var i=1;
alert(i++); // before, 1. current, 1. after, 2.
alert(i); // before, 2. current, 2. after, 2.
alert(++i); // before, 2. current, 3 after, 3.
虽然数组(我认为所有)和其他一些函数和调用使用0作为起点,但当使用++ I时,必须将I设置为-1以使循环与数组一起工作。
当使用i++时,下面的值将使用增加的值。你可以说i++是人类计数的方式,因为你可以从0开始。
其他回答
下面是一个Java-Sample和字节码,后增量和前增量显示字节码没有区别:
public class PreOrPostIncrement {
static int somethingToIncrement = 0;
public static void main(String[] args) {
final int rounds = 1000;
postIncrement(rounds);
preIncrement(rounds);
}
private static void postIncrement(final int rounds) {
for (int i = 0; i < rounds; i++) {
somethingToIncrement++;
}
}
private static void preIncrement(final int rounds) {
for (int i = 0; i < rounds; ++i) {
++somethingToIncrement;
}
}
}
现在对于字节码(javap -private -c PreOrPostIncrement):
public class PreOrPostIncrement extends java.lang.Object{
static int somethingToIncrement;
static {};
Code:
0: iconst_0
1: putstatic #10; //Field somethingToIncrement:I
4: return
public PreOrPostIncrement();
Code:
0: aload_0
1: invokespecial #15; //Method java/lang/Object."<init>":()V
4: return
public static void main(java.lang.String[]);
Code:
0: sipush 1000
3: istore_1
4: sipush 1000
7: invokestatic #21; //Method postIncrement:(I)V
10: sipush 1000
13: invokestatic #25; //Method preIncrement:(I)V
16: return
private static void postIncrement(int);
Code:
0: iconst_0
1: istore_1
2: goto 16
5: getstatic #10; //Field somethingToIncrement:I
8: iconst_1
9: iadd
10: putstatic #10; //Field somethingToIncrement:I
13: iinc 1, 1
16: iload_1
17: iload_0
18: if_icmplt 5
21: return
private static void preIncrement(int);
Code:
0: iconst_0
1: istore_1
2: goto 16
5: getstatic #10; //Field somethingToIncrement:I
8: iconst_1
9: iadd
10: putstatic #10; //Field somethingToIncrement:I
13: iinc 1, 1
16: iload_1
17: iload_0
18: if_icmplt 5
21: return
}
一个(++i)是前增量,一个(i++)是后增量。区别在于表达式立即返回什么值。
// Psuedocode
int i = 0;
print i++; // Prints 0
print i; // Prints 1
int j = 0;
print ++j; // Prints 1
print j; // Prints 1
编辑:哎呀,完全忽略了循环方面的事情。在for循环中,当它是'step'部分(for(…;…。)),但它也可以在其他情况下发挥作用。
要理解FOR循环的作用
上图显示FOR可以转换为WHILE,因为它们最终具有完全相同的汇编代码(至少在gcc中)。所以我们可以把FOR分解成几部分,来理解它的功能。
for (i = 0; i < 5; ++i) {
DoSomethingA();
DoSomethingB();
}
等于WHILE版本
i = 0; //first argument (a statement) of for
while (i < 5 /*second argument (a condition) of for*/) {
DoSomethingA();
DoSomethingB();
++i; //third argument (another statement) of for
}
It means that you can use FOR as a simple version of WHILE: The first argument of FOR (int i) is executed, outside, before the loop. The third argument of FOR (i++ or ++i) is executed, inside, in the last line of the loop. TL:DR: no matter whether i++ or ++i, we know that when they are standalone, they make no difference but +1 on themselves. In school, they usually teach the i++ way, but there are also lots of people prefer the ++i way due to several reasons. NOTE: In the past, i++ has very little impact on the performance, as it does not only plus one by itself, but also keeps the original value in the register. But for now, it makes no difference as the compiler makes the plus one part the same.
是的,在for循环中,++i和i++之间是有区别的,尽管在不寻常的用例中;当在for块中或在循环测试表达式中使用带有递增/递减操作符的循环变量,或与其中一个循环变量一起使用时。不,这不仅仅是语法问题。
因为i在代码中表示对表达式i求值,而运算符并不表示求值,而只是一个操作;
++i表示将i的值增加1,然后对i求值, i++表示对I求值,然后将I的值增加1。
因此,从每两个表达式中得到的内容是不同的,因为在每个表达式中求值的内容是不同的。i和i都一样
例如;
let i = 0
i++ // evaluates to value of i, means evaluates to 0, later increments i by 1, i is now 1
0
i
1
++i // increments i by 1, i is now 2, later evaluates to value of i, means evaluates to 2
2
i
2
在不寻常的用例中,下一个例子听起来有用与否并不重要,它显示了差异
for(i=0, j=i; i<10; j=++i){
console.log(j, i)
}
for(i=0, j=i; i<10; j=i++){
console.log(j, i)
}
正如这段代码所示(请参阅注释中拆解的MSIL), c# 3编译器在for循环中不区分i++和++i。如果取i++或++i的值,肯定会有区别(这是在visual Studio 2008 / Release Build中编译的):
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
namespace PreOrPostIncrement
{
class Program
{
static int SomethingToIncrement;
static void Main(string[] args)
{
PreIncrement(1000);
PostIncrement(1000);
Console.WriteLine("SomethingToIncrement={0}", SomethingToIncrement);
}
static void PreIncrement(int count)
{
/*
.method private hidebysig static void PreIncrement(int32 count) cil managed
{
// Code size 25 (0x19)
.maxstack 2
.locals init ([0] int32 i)
IL_0000: ldc.i4.0
IL_0001: stloc.0
IL_0002: br.s IL_0014
IL_0004: ldsfld int32 PreOrPostIncrement.Program::SomethingToIncrement
IL_0009: ldc.i4.1
IL_000a: add
IL_000b: stsfld int32 PreOrPostIncrement.Program::SomethingToIncrement
IL_0010: ldloc.0
IL_0011: ldc.i4.1
IL_0012: add
IL_0013: stloc.0
IL_0014: ldloc.0
IL_0015: ldarg.0
IL_0016: blt.s IL_0004
IL_0018: ret
} // end of method Program::PreIncrement
*/
for (int i = 0; i < count; ++i)
{
++SomethingToIncrement;
}
}
static void PostIncrement(int count)
{
/*
.method private hidebysig static void PostIncrement(int32 count) cil managed
{
// Code size 25 (0x19)
.maxstack 2
.locals init ([0] int32 i)
IL_0000: ldc.i4.0
IL_0001: stloc.0
IL_0002: br.s IL_0014
IL_0004: ldsfld int32 PreOrPostIncrement.Program::SomethingToIncrement
IL_0009: ldc.i4.1
IL_000a: add
IL_000b: stsfld int32 PreOrPostIncrement.Program::SomethingToIncrement
IL_0010: ldloc.0
IL_0011: ldc.i4.1
IL_0012: add
IL_0013: stloc.0
IL_0014: ldloc.0
IL_0015: ldarg.0
IL_0016: blt.s IL_0004
IL_0018: ret
} // end of method Program::PostIncrement
*/
for (int i = 0; i < count; i++)
{
SomethingToIncrement++;
}
}
}
}
推荐文章
- 如何在for循环中注释类型?
- 在支持循环和函数的语言中,是否存在“goto”的合法用例?
- 为什么不使用异常作为常规的控制流呢?
- 列表推导式和函数式函数比for循环更快吗?
- 什么是序列化?
- 我怎么能循环通过一个列表<T>和抓取每个项目?
- 每个递归都可以转换成迭代吗?
- 去下一次迭代在java For循环
- 什么是ORM,它是如何工作的,我应该如何使用它?
- 我能在服务器端应用程序(PHP、Ruby、Python等)上读取URL的哈希部分吗?
- 元素在“for(…in…)”循环中排序
- 多少个参数是太多?
- 是否有可能在没有迭代器变量的情况下实现Python for range循环?
- 对于不可变集合上的非突变“add”方法,最好的名称是什么?
- foo到底是什么意思?