这是我把错误写在日志文件和控制台的解决方案:

import logging, sys
import traceback
logging.basicConfig(filename='error.log', level=logging.DEBUG)

def handle_exception(exc_type, exc_value, exc_traceback):
    if issubclass(exc_type, KeyboardInterrupt):
        sys.__excepthook__(exc_type, exc_value, exc_traceback)
        return
    exc_info=(exc_type, exc_value, exc_traceback)
    logging.critical("\nDate:" + str(datetime.datetime.now()), exc_info=(exc_type, exc_value, exc_traceback))
    print("An error occured, check error.log to see the error details")
    traceback.print_exception(*exc_info)


sys.excepthook = handle_exception

你可以这样做:

try:
    do_stuff()
except Exception, err:
    print(Exception, err)
    raise err

import io
import traceback

try:
    call_code_that_fails()
except:

    errors = io.StringIO()
    traceback.print_exc(file=errors)  # Instead of printing directly to stdout, the result can be further processed
    contents = str(errors.getvalue())
    print(contents)
    errors.close()

其他一些答案已经指出了回溯模块。

请注意，使用print_exc，在某些极端情况下，您将无法获得您所期望的结果。在Python 2.x中:

import traceback

try:
    raise TypeError("Oups!")
except Exception, err:
    try:
        raise TypeError("Again !?!")
    except:
        pass

    traceback.print_exc()

.．.将显示上一个异常的回溯:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "e.py", line 7, in <module>
    raise TypeError("Again !?!")
TypeError: Again !?!

如果你真的需要访问原始的回溯，一个解决方案是将exc_info返回的异常信息缓存到一个局部变量中，并使用print_exception显示它:

import traceback
import sys

try:
    raise TypeError("Oups!")
except Exception, err:
    try:
        exc_info = sys.exc_info()

        # do you usefull stuff here
        # (potentially raising an exception)
        try:
            raise TypeError("Again !?!")
        except:
            pass
        # end of useful stuff


    finally:
        # Display the *original* exception
        traceback.print_exception(*exc_info)
        del exc_info

生产:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "t.py", line 6, in <module>
    raise TypeError("Oups!")
TypeError: Oups!

但这也有一些陷阱:

From the doc of sys_info: Assigning the traceback return value to a local variable in a function that is handling an exception will cause a circular reference. This will prevent anything referenced by a local variable in the same function or by the traceback from being garbage collected. [...] If you do need the traceback, make sure to delete it after use (best done with a try ... finally statement) but, from the same doc: Beginning with Python 2.2, such cycles are automatically reclaimed when garbage collection is enabled and they become unreachable, but it remains more efficient to avoid creating cycles.

另一方面，通过允许你访问与异常相关的回溯，Python 3产生了一个不那么令人惊讶的结果:

import traceback

try:
    raise TypeError("Oups!")
except Exception as err:
    try:
        raise TypeError("Again !?!")
    except:
        pass

    traceback.print_tb(err.__traceback__)

．.． 将显示:

  File "e3.py", line 4, in <module>
    raise TypeError("Oups!")

要获得精确的堆栈跟踪(作为字符串)，如果没有try/except进行跨步处理，则会引发该字符串，只需将其放置在捕获违规异常的except块中。

desired_trace = traceback.format_exc(sys.exc_info())

下面是如何使用它(假设定义了flaky_func，并且log调用您最喜欢的日志系统):

import traceback
import sys

try:
    flaky_func()
except KeyboardInterrupt:
    raise
except Exception:
    desired_trace = traceback.format_exc(sys.exc_info())
    log(desired_trace)

捕获并重新引发KeyboardInterrupts是个好主意，这样您仍然可以使用Ctrl-C终止程序。日志记录不在这个问题的范围之内，但是日志记录是一个很好的选择。sys和traceback模块的文档。

我在其他答案中没有看到这个。如果你出于某种原因传递一个Exception对象……

在Python 3.5+中，您可以使用traceback.TracebackException.from_exception()从Exception对象获取跟踪。例如:

import traceback


def stack_lvl_3():
    raise Exception('a1', 'b2', 'c3')


def stack_lvl_2():
    try:
        stack_lvl_3()
    except Exception as e:
        # raise
        return e


def stack_lvl_1():
    e = stack_lvl_2()
    return e

e = stack_lvl_1()

tb1 = traceback.TracebackException.from_exception(e)
print(''.join(tb1.format()))

然而，上面的代码导致:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "exc.py", line 10, in stack_lvl_2
    stack_lvl_3()
  File "exc.py", line 5, in stack_lvl_3
    raise Exception('a1', 'b2', 'c3')
Exception: ('a1', 'b2', 'c3')

这只是堆栈的两层，而不是在stack_lvl_2()中引发异常而没有被拦截(取消注释# raise行)时在屏幕上打印的内容。

根据我的理解，这是因为异常在被引发时只记录堆栈的当前级别，在本例中是stack_lvl_3()。当它在堆栈中往回传递时，更多的层被添加到它的__traceback__中。但是我们在stack_lvl_2()中拦截了它，这意味着它只能记录级别3和2。要获得打印在stdout上的完整跟踪，我们必须在最高(最低?)级别捕获它:

import traceback


def stack_lvl_3():
    raise Exception('a1', 'b2', 'c3')


def stack_lvl_2():
    stack_lvl_3()


def stack_lvl_1():
    stack_lvl_2()


try:
    stack_lvl_1()
except Exception as exc:
    tb = traceback.TracebackException.from_exception(exc)

print('Handled at stack lvl 0')
print(''.join(tb.stack.format()))

结果是:

Handled at stack lvl 0
  File "exc.py", line 17, in <module>
    stack_lvl_1()
  File "exc.py", line 13, in stack_lvl_1
    stack_lvl_2()
  File "exc.py", line 9, in stack_lvl_2
    stack_lvl_3()
  File "exc.py", line 5, in stack_lvl_3
    raise Exception('a1', 'b2', 'c3')

注意，堆栈打印是不同的，第一行和最后一行都不见了。因为它是不同的格式()。

在尽可能远离异常引发点的地方拦截异常，可以简化代码，同时提供更多信息。