当前的Apache Commons Validator版本为1.3.1。

进行验证的类是org.apache.commons.validator.EmailValidator。它导入了org.apache.oro.text.perl。Perl5Util来自一个退役的雅加达ORO项目。

BTW, I found that there is a 1.4 version, here are the API docs. On the site it says: "Last Published: 05 March 2008 | Version: 1.4-SNAPSHOT", but that's not final. Only way to build yourself (but this is a snapshot, not RELEASE) and use, or download from here. This means 1.4 has not been made final for three years (2008-2011). This is not in Apache's style. I'm looking for a better option, but didn't find one that is very adopted. I want to use something that is well tested, don't want to hit any bugs.

Les Hazlewood使用Java正则表达式编写了一个非常完整的符合RFC 2822的电子邮件验证器类。你可以在http://www.leshazlewood.com/?p=23上找到它。然而，它的彻底性(或Java RE实现)导致效率低下——阅读关于长地址解析时间的注释。

你可能还想检查长度——电子邮件的长度不超过254个字符。我使用apache commons验证器，它不检查这个。

尽管有许多替代Apache commons的方法，但它们的实现充其量只是基本的(就像Apache commons的实现本身一样)，在其他情况下甚至是完全错误的。

我也会远离所谓的简单的“非限制性”正则表达式;没有这样的事。例如，@根据上下文被允许多次使用，你怎么知道需要的那个在那里?简单的正则表达式无法理解它，即使电子邮件应该是有效的。任何更复杂的东西都很容易出错，甚至包含隐藏的性能杀手。你要怎么维护这样的东西?

我所知道的唯一一个全面的RFC兼容的基于regex的验证器是email-rfc2822-validator，它的“精炼”regex适当地命名为Dragons.java。它只支持较旧的RFC-2822规范，尽管它足够满足现代需求(RFC-5322在日常使用范围之外的地方更新了它)。

但真正需要的是一个词法分析器，它可以正确地解析字符串，并根据RFC语法将其分解为组件结构。EmailValidator4J在这方面似乎很有前途，但仍然很年轻，而且有局限性。

另一种选择是使用webservice，比如Mailgun经过实战测试的验证webservice或Mailboxlayer API(只使用第一个谷歌结果)。它不是严格的RFC兼容，但是对于现代需求来说已经足够好了。

这是最好的方法:

public static boolean isValidEmail(String enteredEmail){
        String EMAIL_REGIX = "^[\\\\w!#$%&’*+/=?`{|}~^-]+(?:\\\\.[\\\\w!#$%&’*+/=?`{|}~^-]+)*@(?:[a-zA-Z0-9-]+\\\\.)+[a-zA-Z]{2,6}$";
        Pattern pattern = Pattern.compile(EMAIL_REGIX);
        Matcher matcher = pattern.matcher(enteredEmail);
        return ((!enteredEmail.isEmpty()) && (enteredEmail!=null) && (matcher.matches()));
    }

来源: http://howtodoinjava.com/2014/11/11/java-regex-validate-email-address/

http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5322.txt

当前的Apache Commons Validator版本为1.3.1。

进行验证的类是org.apache.commons.validator.EmailValidator。它导入了org.apache.oro.text.perl。Perl5Util来自一个退役的雅加达ORO项目。

BTW, I found that there is a 1.4 version, here are the API docs. On the site it says: "Last Published: 05 March 2008 | Version: 1.4-SNAPSHOT", but that's not final. Only way to build yourself (but this is a snapshot, not RELEASE) and use, or download from here. This means 1.4 has not been made final for three years (2008-2011). This is not in Apache's style. I'm looking for a better option, but didn't find one that is very adopted. I want to use something that is well tested, don't want to hit any bugs.