我想做的事情是:
foo = {
'foo': 1,
'zip': 2,
'zam': 3,
'bar': 4
}
if ("foo", "bar") in foo:
#do stuff
我如何检查是否foo和酒吧都在dict foo?
我想做的事情是:
foo = {
'foo': 1,
'zip': 2,
'zam': 3,
'bar': 4
}
if ("foo", "bar") in foo:
#do stuff
我如何检查是否foo和酒吧都在dict foo?
当前回答
对我来说,简单和容易与pydash裁判中间的无键
import pydash as _
_.get(d, 'key1.key2.key3.whatevermaybeNone.inthemiddle', default=None) )
其他回答
这应该可以工作:
if all(key in foo for key in ["foo","bar"]):
# do stuff
pass
提示:
在all()中使用方括号来创建一个列表推导式:
if all([key in foo for key in ["foo","bar"]]):
不仅是不必要的,而且是非常有害的,因为它们阻碍了all()的正常短路行为。
你可以这样做:
>>> if all(k in foo for k in ("foo","bar")):
... print "They're there!"
...
They're there!
这里有一个替代的解决方案,以防你想要得到不匹配的项目……
not_existing_keys = [item for item in ["foo","bar"] if item not in foo]
if not_existing_keys:
log.error('These items are missing', not_existing_keys)
使用集:
if set(("foo", "bar")).issubset(foo):
#do stuff
另外:
if set(("foo", "bar")) <= set(foo):
#do stuff
这只是我的看法,在所有给定的选项中,有两个方法很容易理解。所以我的主要标准是代码可读性强,而不是特别快。为了保持代码的可理解性,我更喜欢给定的可能性:
var <=var2.keys() var.issubset(var2)
事实上,“var <= var2.keys()”在我下面的测试中执行得更快,我更喜欢这个。
import timeit
timeit.timeit('var <= var2.keys()', setup='var={"managed_ip", "hostname", "fqdn"}; var2= {"zone": "test-domain1.var23.com", "hostname": "bakje", "api_client_ip": "127.0.0.1", "request_data": "", "request_method": "GET", "request_url": "hvar2p://127.0.0.1:5000/test-domain1.var23.com/bakje", "utc_datetime": "04-Apr-2019 07:01:10", "fqdn": "bakje.test-domain1.var23.com"}; var={"managed_ip", "hostname", "fqdn"}')
0.1745898080000643
timeit.timeit('var.issubset(var2)', setup='var={"managed_ip", "hostname", "fqdn"}; var2= {"zone": "test-domain1.var23.com", "hostname": "bakje", "api_client_ip": "127.0.0.1", "request_data": "", "request_method": "GET", "request_url": "hvar2p://127.0.0.1:5000/test-domain1.var23.com/bakje", "utc_datetime": "04-Apr-2019 07:01:10", "fqdn": "bakje.test-domain1.var23.com"}; var={"managed_ip", "hostname", "fqdn"};')
0.2644960229999924