我如何运行异步任务<T>方法同步?

我正在学习异步/等待，遇到了需要同步调用异步方法的情况。我该怎么做呢?

异步方法:

public async Task<Customers> GetCustomers()
{
    return await Service.GetCustomersAsync();
}

正常的用法:

public async void GetCustomers()
{
    customerList = await GetCustomers();
}

我尝试使用以下方法:

Task<Customer> task = GetCustomers();
task.Wait()

Task<Customer> task = GetCustomers();
task.RunSynchronously();

Task<Customer> task = GetCustomers();
while(task.Status != TaskStatus.RanToCompletion)

我还尝试了这里的一个建议，但是当调度程序处于挂起状态时，它不起作用。

public static void WaitWithPumping(this Task task) 
{
        if (task == null) throw new ArgumentNullException(“task”);
        var nestedFrame = new DispatcherFrame();
        task.ContinueWith(_ => nestedFrame.Continue = false);
        Dispatcher.PushFrame(nestedFrame);
        task.Wait();
}

下面是调用runsynchronically时的异常和堆栈跟踪:

系统。InvalidOperationException 消息:在未绑定到委托的任务上不能调用runsynchronically。 InnerException:零来源:mscorlib 加:

          at System.Threading.Tasks.Task.InternalRunSynchronously(TaskScheduler scheduler)
   at System.Threading.Tasks.Task.RunSynchronously()
   at MyApplication.CustomControls.Controls.MyCustomControl.CreateAvailablePanelList() in C:\Documents and Settings\...\MyApplication.CustomControls\Controls\MyCustomControl.xaml.cs:line 638
   at MyApplication.CustomControls.Controls.MyCustomControl.get_AvailablePanels() in C:\Documents and Settings\...\MyApplication.CustomControls\Controls\MyCustomControl.xaml.cs:line 233
   at MyApplication.CustomControls.Controls.MyCustomControl.<CreateOpenPanelList>b__36(DesktopPanel panel) in C:\Documents and Settings\...\MyApplication.CustomControls\Controls\MyCustomControl.xaml.cs:line 597
   at System.Collections.Generic.List`1.ForEach(Action`1 action)
   at MyApplication.CustomControls.Controls.MyCustomControl.<CreateOpenPanelList>d__3b.MoveNext() in C:\Documents and Settings\...\MyApplication.CustomControls\Controls\MyCustomControl.xaml.cs:line 625
   at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter.<>c__DisplayClass7.<TrySetContinuationForAwait>b__1(Object state)
   at System.Windows.Threading.ExceptionWrapper.InternalRealCall(Delegate callback, Object args, Int32 numArgs)
   at MS.Internal.Threading.ExceptionFilterHelper.TryCatchWhen(Object source, Delegate method, Object args, Int32 numArgs, Delegate catchHandler)
   at System.Windows.Threading.DispatcherOperation.InvokeImpl()
   at System.Windows.Threading.DispatcherOperation.InvokeInSecurityContext(Object state)
   at System.Threading.ExecutionContext.runTryCode(Object userData)
   at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.RuntimeHelpers.ExecuteCodeWithGuaranteedCleanup(TryCode code, CleanupCode backoutCode, Object userData)
   at System.Threading.ExecutionContext.RunInternal(ExecutionContext executionContext, ContextCallback callback, Object state)
   at System.Threading.ExecutionContext.Run(ExecutionContext executionContext, ContextCallback callback, Object state, Boolean ignoreSyncCtx)
   at System.Threading.ExecutionContext.Run(ExecutionContext executionContext, ContextCallback callback, Object state)
   at System.Windows.Threading.DispatcherOperation.Invoke()
   at System.Windows.Threading.Dispatcher.ProcessQueue()
   at System.Windows.Threading.Dispatcher.WndProcHook(IntPtr hwnd, Int32 msg, IntPtr wParam, IntPtr lParam, Boolean& handled)
   at MS.Win32.HwndWrapper.WndProc(IntPtr hwnd, Int32 msg, IntPtr wParam, IntPtr lParam, Boolean& handled)
   at MS.Win32.HwndSubclass.DispatcherCallbackOperation(Object o)
   at System.Windows.Threading.ExceptionWrapper.InternalRealCall(Delegate callback, Object args, Int32 numArgs)
   at MS.Internal.Threading.ExceptionFilterHelper.TryCatchWhen(Object source, Delegate method, Object args, Int32 numArgs, Delegate catchHandler)
   at System.Windows.Threading.Dispatcher.InvokeImpl(DispatcherPriority priority, TimeSpan timeout, Delegate method, Object args, Int32 numArgs)
   at MS.Win32.HwndSubclass.SubclassWndProc(IntPtr hwnd, Int32 msg, IntPtr wParam, IntPtr lParam)
   at MS.Win32.UnsafeNativeMethods.DispatchMessage(MSG& msg)
   at System.Windows.Threading.Dispatcher.PushFrameImpl(DispatcherFrame frame)
   at System.Windows.Threading.Dispatcher.PushFrame(DispatcherFrame frame)
   at System.Windows.Threading.Dispatcher.Run()
   at System.Windows.Application.RunDispatcher(Object ignore)
   at System.Windows.Application.RunInternal(Window window)
   at System.Windows.Application.Run(Window window)
   at System.Windows.Application.Run()
   at MyApplication.App.Main() in C:\Documents and Settings\...\MyApplication\obj\Debug\App.g.cs:line 50
   at System.AppDomain._nExecuteAssembly(RuntimeAssembly assembly, String[] args)
   at System.AppDomain.ExecuteAssembly(String assemblyFile, Evidence assemblySecurity, String[] args)
   at Microsoft.VisualStudio.HostingProcess.HostProc.RunUsersAssembly()
   at System.Threading.ThreadHelper.ThreadStart_Context(Object state)
   at System.Threading.ExecutionContext.Run(ExecutionContext executionContext, ContextCallback callback, Object state, Boolean ignoreSyncCtx)
   at System.Threading.ExecutionContext.Run(ExecutionContext executionContext, ContextCallback callback, Object state)
   at System.Threading.ThreadHelper.ThreadStart()

当前回答

在线程池上运行任务要简单得多，而不是试图欺骗调度器以同步方式运行它。这样可以确保它不会死锁。由于上下文切换会影响性能。

Task<MyResult> DoSomethingAsync() { ... }

// Starts the asynchronous task on a thread-pool thread.
// Returns a proxy to the original task.
Task<MyResult> task = Task.Run(() => DoSomethingAsync());

// Will block until the task is completed...
MyResult result = task.Result;

2013-06-13 18:50:54

其他回答

或者你可以直接说:

customerList = Task.Run<List<Customer>>(() => { return GetCustomers(); }).Result;

要进行编译，请确保引用扩展程序集:

System.Net.Http.Formatting

2016-03-08 23:21:17

在线程池上运行任务要简单得多，而不是试图欺骗调度器以同步方式运行它。这样可以确保它不会死锁。由于上下文切换会影响性能。

Task<MyResult> DoSomethingAsync() { ... }

// Starts the asynchronous task on a thread-pool thread.
// Returns a proxy to the original task.
Task<MyResult> task = Task.Run(() => DoSomethingAsync());

// Will block until the task is completed...
MyResult result = task.Result;

2013-06-13 18:50:54

我发现同步运行任务且不阻塞UI线程的最简单方法是使用runsynchronize()，如下所示:

Task t = new Task(() => 
{ 
   //.... YOUR CODE ....
});
t.RunSynchronously();

在我的示例中，我有一个事件，它在发生某些事情时触发。我不知道还会发生多少次。所以，我在我的事件中使用上面的代码，所以每当它触发时，它都会创建一个任务。任务是同步执行的，这对我来说很棒。我只是很惊讶，我花了这么长时间才发现这一点，考虑到它是多么简单。通常，推荐要复杂得多，而且容易出错。这是它的简单和干净。

2016-10-25 23:22:45

令人惊讶的是没有人提到这一点:

public Task<int> BlahAsync()
{
    // ...
}

int result = BlahAsync().GetAwaiter().GetResult();

虽然不像这里的其他一些方法那么漂亮，但它有以下好处:

它不会吞下异常(像Wait) 它不会包装在AggregateException中抛出的任何异常(如Result) 适用于Task和Task<T>(自己试试!)

此外，由于GetAwaiter是鸭子类型的，这应该适用于从异步方法返回的任何对象(如ConfiguredAwaitable或YieldAwaitable)，而不仅仅是任务。

edit:请注意，这种方法(或使用. result)可能会死锁，除非你确保每次等待时都添加. configureawait (false)，对于所有可能从BlahAsync()到达的异步方法(不仅仅是它直接调用的方法)。解释。

// In BlahAsync() body
await FooAsync(); // BAD!
await FooAsync().ConfigureAwait(false); // Good... but make sure FooAsync() and
                                        // all its descendants use ConfigureAwait(false)
                                        // too. Then you can be sure that
                                        // BlahAsync().GetAwaiter().GetResult()
                                        // won't deadlock.

如果你懒得在所有地方添加.ConfigureAwait(false)，并且你不关心性能，你也可以这样做

Task.Run(() => BlahAsync()).GetAwaiter().GetResult()

2016-02-07 19:29:54

请注意，这个答案是三年前的。我主要是根据。net 4.0的使用经验编写的，很少使用4.5，尤其是async-await。一般来说，这是一个很好的简单的解决方案，但有时它会破坏一些东西。请阅读评论中的讨论。

net 4.5

就用这个吧:

// For Task<T>: will block until the task is completed...
var result = task.Result; 

// For Task (not Task<T>): will block until the task is completed...
task2.RunSynchronously();

看到的: TaskAwaiter, 的任务。结果, 的任务。RunSynchronously

net 4.0

用这个:

var x = (IAsyncResult)task;
task.Start();

x.AsyncWaitHandle.WaitOne();

.．.或:

task.Start();
task.Wait();

2012-08-02 17:03:47

我如何运行异步任务<T>方法同步?

推荐文章

最新文章

标签