如何使用JUnit来测试某些代码是否抛出异常?
我当然可以这样做:
@Test
public void testFooThrowsIndexOutOfBoundsException() {
boolean thrown = false;
try {
foo.doStuff();
} catch (IndexOutOfBoundsException e) {
thrown = true;
}
assertTrue(thrown);
}
我记得,对于这类情况,有一个注释或Assert.xyz之类的东西远没有JUnit那么笨拙,更符合JUnit的精神。
只需制作一个可以关闭和打开的Matcher,如下所示:
public class ExceptionMatcher extends BaseMatcher<Throwable> {
private boolean active = true;
private Class<? extends Throwable> throwable;
public ExceptionMatcher(Class<? extends Throwable> throwable) {
this.throwable = throwable;
}
public void on() {
this.active = true;
}
public void off() {
this.active = false;
}
@Override
public boolean matches(Object object) {
return active && throwable.isAssignableFrom(object.getClass());
}
@Override
public void describeTo(Description description) {
description.appendText("not the covered exception type");
}
}
要使用它:
add public ExpectedException exception=ExpectedException.none();,那么:
ExceptionMatcher exMatch = new ExceptionMatcher(MyException.class);
exception.expect(exMatch);
someObject.somethingThatThrowsMyException();
exMatch.off();
编辑:现在JUnit 5和JUnit 4.13已经发布,最好的选择是使用Assertions.assertThrows()(针对JUnit 5)和Assertions.AssertThrow()(对于JUnit 4.13+)。有关详细信息,请参阅我的其他答案。
如果您尚未迁移到JUnit 5,但可以使用JUnit 4.7,则可以使用ExpectedException规则:
public class FooTest {
@Rule
public final ExpectedException exception = ExpectedException.none();
@Test
public void doStuffThrowsIndexOutOfBoundsException() {
Foo foo = new Foo();
exception.expect(IndexOutOfBoundsException.class);
foo.doStuff();
}
}
这比@Test(预期=IndexOutOfBoundsException.class)好得多,因为如果在foo.doStuff()之前抛出IndexOutofBoundsExcept,测试将失败
有关详细信息,请参阅本文。
Java 8解决方案
如果您想要一个解决方案:
利用Java 8 lambda不依赖任何JUnit魔法允许您检查单个测试方法中的多个异常检查测试方法中特定的一组行(而不是整个测试方法中的任何未知行)是否引发异常生成引发的实际异常对象,以便您可以进一步检查它
下面是我编写的实用函数:
public final <T extends Throwable> T expectException( Class<T> exceptionClass, Runnable runnable )
{
try
{
runnable.run();
}
catch( Throwable throwable )
{
if( throwable instanceof AssertionError && throwable.getCause() != null )
throwable = throwable.getCause(); //allows testing for "assert x != null : new IllegalArgumentException();"
assert exceptionClass.isInstance( throwable ) : throwable; //exception of the wrong kind was thrown.
assert throwable.getClass() == exceptionClass : throwable; //exception thrown was a subclass, but not the exact class, expected.
@SuppressWarnings( "unchecked" )
T result = (T)throwable;
return result;
}
assert false; //expected exception was not thrown.
return null; //to keep the compiler happy.
}
(摘自我的博客)
使用方法如下:
@Test
public void testMyFunction()
{
RuntimeException e = expectException( RuntimeException.class, () ->
{
myFunction();
} );
assert e.getMessage().equals( "I haz fail!" );
}
public void myFunction()
{
throw new RuntimeException( "I haz fail!" );
}
我想评论一下这个问题的解决方案,它避免了任何与异常相关的JUnit代码。
我使用assertTrue(布尔值)和try/catch组合来查找要抛出的预期异常。下面是一个示例:
public void testConstructor() {
boolean expectedExceptionThrown;
try {
// Call constructor with bad arguments
double a = 1;
double b = 2;
double c = a + b; // In my example, this is an invalid option for c
new Triangle(a, b, c);
expectedExceptionThrown = false; // because it successfully constructed the object
}
catch(IllegalArgumentException e) {
expectedExceptionThrown = true; // because I'm in this catch block
}
catch(Exception e) {
expectedExceptionThrown = false; // because it threw an exception but not the one expected
}
assertTrue(expectedExceptionThrown);
}