如何修复此代码中的弃用警告?或者,还有其他的选择吗?
Handler().postDelayed({
context?.let {
//code
}
}, 3000)
如何修复此代码中的弃用警告?或者,还有其他的选择吗?
Handler().postDelayed({
context?.let {
//code
}
}, 3000)
当前回答
协程 Kotlin
private val SPLASH_SCREEN_TIME_OUT_CONST: Long = 3000
override fun onCreate(savedInstanceState: Bundle?) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState)
setContentView(R.layout.activity_splash)
window.setFlags(
WindowManager.LayoutParams.FLAG_FULLSCREEN,
WindowManager.LayoutParams.FLAG_FULLSCREEN
)
GlobalScope.launch {
delay(SPLASH_SCREEN_TIME_OUT_CONST)
goToIntro()
}
}
private fun goToIntro(){
startActivity(Intent(this, IntroActivity::class.java))
finish()
}
其他回答
在Kotlin中使用这种结构是个好主意
companion object Run {
fun after(delay: Long, process: () -> Unit) {
Handler(Looper.getMainLooper()).postDelayed({
process()
}, delay)
}
}
稍后称为
Run.after(SPLASH_TIME_OUT) {
val action = SplashFragmentDirections.actionSplashFragmentToLogin()
v.findNavController().navigate(action)
}
考虑使用协程
scope.launch {
delay(3000L)
// do stuff
}
根据文档(https://developer.android.com/reference/android/os/Handler#Handler()):
Implicitly choosing a Looper during Handler construction can lead to bugs where operations are silently lost (if the Handler is not expecting new tasks and quits), crashes (if a handler is sometimes created on a thread without a Looper active), or race conditions, where the thread a handler is associated with is not what the author anticipated. Instead, use an Executor or specify the Looper explicitly, using Looper#getMainLooper, {link android.view.View#getHandler}, or similar. If the implicit thread local behavior is required for compatibility, use new Handler(Looper.myLooper()) to make it clear to readers.
我们应该停止使用没有Looper的构造函数,而是指定一个Looper。
如果你想避免在Kotlin (?或者!!)你可以使用loop . getmainlooper()如果你的Handler正在处理一些UI相关的事情,像这样:
Handler(Looper.getMainLooper()).postDelayed({
Toast.makeText(this@MainActivity, "LOOPER", Toast.LENGTH_SHORT).show()
}, 3000)
注意:如果使用fragment,请使用requireContext()而不是this@MainActivity。
在Handler构造函数中提供一个循环器
Handler(Looper.getMainLooper())