我会用另一种方法来回答这个问题，询问面试官关于他试图解决的更大问题的更多细节。根据问题和围绕它的需求，显而易见的基于集的解决方案可能是正确的，而生成一个列表然后从中挑选的方法可能不是。

For example, it might be that the interviewer is going to dispatch n messages and needs to know the k that didn't result in a reply and needs to know it in as little wall clock time as possible after the n-kth reply arrives. Let's also say that the message channel's nature is such that even running at full bore, there's enough time to do some processing between messages without having any impact on how long it takes to produce the end result after the last reply arrives. That time can be put to use inserting some identifying facet of each sent message into a set and deleting it as each corresponding reply arrives. Once the last reply has arrived, the only thing to be done is to remove its identifier from the set, which in typical implementations takes O(log k+1). After that, the set contains the list of k missing elements and there's no additional processing to be done.

这当然不是批处理预先生成的数字袋的最快方法，因为整个过程运行O((log 1 + log 2 +…)+ log n) + (log n + log n-1 +…+ log k))。但它确实适用于任何k值(即使它事先不知道)，在上面的例子中，它的应用方式使最关键的区间最小化。

我认为可以这样概括:

表示S, M为等差级数和乘法的初始值。

S = 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + ... n=(n+1)*n/2
M = 1 * 2 * 3 * 4 * .... * n 

我应该考虑一个公式来计算这个，但这不是重点。无论如何，如果缺少一个数字，您已经提供了解决方案。但是，如果少了两个数字，让我们用S1和M1表示新的和和和总倍数，如下所示:

S1 = S - (a + b)....................(1)

Where a and b are the missing numbers.

M1 = M - (a * b)....................(2)

因为你知道S1 M1 M和S，上面的方程是可以解出a和b，缺失的数字。

现在来看看遗漏的三个数字:

S2 = S - ( a + b + c)....................(1)

Where a and b are the missing numbers.

M2 = M - (a * b * c)....................(2)

现在未知量是3而你只有两个方程可以解。

我们假设它是一个从1到N的数组，它的元素是a1, a2， ....一个:

1+N=N+1;
2+N-1=N+1;

… 所以这个和是唯一的。我们可以从头到尾扫描数组来添加两个元素。如果和是N+1;好吧，否则它们就不见了。

for (I <= N/2) {
    temp = a[I] + a[n-I];
    if (temp != N+1) then
        Find the missing number or numbers
}

迭代这个循环，很容易就能得到答案。

也许这个算法可以解决问题1:

预计算前100个整数的xor (val=1^2^3^4....100) 对来自输入流的元素进行Xor (val1=val1^next_input) 最终的答案= val ^ val1

或者更好:

def GetValue(A)
  val=0
  for i=1 to 100
    do
      val=val^i
    done
  for value in A:
    do
      val=val^value 
    done
  return val

这个算法实际上可以扩展到两个缺失的数字。第一步还是一样。当我们调用缺少两个数字的GetValue时，结果将是a1^a2是缺少的两个数字。让说

跌倒 = a1^a2

Now to sieve out a1 and a2 from val we take any set bit in val. Lets say the ith bit is set in val. That means that a1 and a2 have different parity at ith bit position. Now we do another iteration on the original array and keep two xor values. One for the numbers which have the ith bit set and other which doesn't have the ith bit set. We now have two buckets of numbers, and its guranteed that a1 and a2 will lie in different buckets. Now repeat the same what we did for finding one missing element on each of the bucket.

我会用另一种方法来回答这个问题，询问面试官关于他试图解决的更大问题的更多细节。根据问题和围绕它的需求，显而易见的基于集的解决方案可能是正确的，而生成一个列表然后从中挑选的方法可能不是。

For example, it might be that the interviewer is going to dispatch n messages and needs to know the k that didn't result in a reply and needs to know it in as little wall clock time as possible after the n-kth reply arrives. Let's also say that the message channel's nature is such that even running at full bore, there's enough time to do some processing between messages without having any impact on how long it takes to produce the end result after the last reply arrives. That time can be put to use inserting some identifying facet of each sent message into a set and deleting it as each corresponding reply arrives. Once the last reply has arrived, the only thing to be done is to remove its identifier from the set, which in typical implementations takes O(log k+1). After that, the set contains the list of k missing elements and there's no additional processing to be done.

这当然不是批处理预先生成的数字袋的最快方法，因为整个过程运行O((log 1 + log 2 +…)+ log n) + (log n + log n-1 +…+ log k))。但它确实适用于任何k值(即使它事先不知道)，在上面的例子中，它的应用方式使最关键的区间最小化。

我们可以通过把数字本身和这些数字的平方相加来解Q2。

我们可以把问题简化为

k1 + k2 = x
k1^2 + k2^2 = y

其中x和y表示和低于期望值的程度。

代换给我们:

(x-k2)^2 + k2^2 = y

然后我们可以解出缺失的数。