我认为可以这样概括:

表示S, M为等差级数和乘法的初始值。

S = 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + ... n=(n+1)*n/2
M = 1 * 2 * 3 * 4 * .... * n 

我应该考虑一个公式来计算这个，但这不是重点。无论如何，如果缺少一个数字，您已经提供了解决方案。但是，如果少了两个数字，让我们用S1和M1表示新的和和和总倍数，如下所示:

S1 = S - (a + b)....................(1)

Where a and b are the missing numbers.

M1 = M - (a * b)....................(2)

因为你知道S1 M1 M和S，上面的方程是可以解出a和b，缺失的数字。

现在来看看遗漏的三个数字:

S2 = S - ( a + b + c)....................(1)

Where a and b are the missing numbers.

M2 = M - (a * b * c)....................(2)

现在未知量是3而你只有两个方程可以解。

要解决缺少2(和3)个数字的问题，您可以修改quickselect，它平均在O(n)内运行，如果分区是就地完成的，则使用恒定内存。

Partition the set with respect to a random pivot p into partitions l, which contain numbers smaller than the pivot, and r, which contain numbers greater than the pivot. Determine which partitions the 2 missing numbers are in by comparing the pivot value to the size of each partition (p - 1 - count(l) = count of missing numbers in l and n - count(r) - p = count of missing numbers in r) a) If each partition is missing one number, then use the difference of sums approach to find each missing number. (1 + 2 + ... + (p-1)) - sum(l) = missing #1 and ((p+1) + (p+2) ... + n) - sum(r) = missing #2 b) If one partition is missing both numbers and the partition is empty, then the missing numbers are either (p-1,p-2) or (p+1,p+2) depending on which partition is missing the numbers. If one partition is missing 2 numbers but is not empty, then recurse onto that partiton.

由于只缺少2个数字，该算法总是丢弃至少一个分区，因此保持了O(n)个快速选择的平均时间复杂度。类似地，当缺少3个数字时，该算法也会在每次传递中丢弃至少一个分区(因为当缺少2个数字时，最多只有1个分区包含多个缺少的数字)。然而，我不确定当添加更多缺失的数字时，性能会下降多少。

下面是一个不使用就地分区的实现，所以这个例子不满足空间要求，但它确实说明了算法的步骤:

<?php

  $list = range(1,100);
  unset($list[3]);
  unset($list[31]);

  findMissing($list,1,100);

  function findMissing($list, $min, $max) {
    if(empty($list)) {
      print_r(range($min, $max));
      return;
    }

    $l = $r = [];
    $pivot = array_pop($list);

    foreach($list as $number) {
      if($number < $pivot) {
        $l[] = $number;
      }
      else {
        $r[] = $number;
      }
    }

    if(count($l) == $pivot - $min - 1) {
      // only 1 missing number use difference of sums
      print array_sum(range($min, $pivot-1)) - array_sum($l) . "\n";
    }
    else if(count($l) < $pivot - $min) {
      // more than 1 missing number, recurse
      findMissing($l, $min, $pivot-1);
    }

    if(count($r) == $max - $pivot - 1) {
      // only 1 missing number use difference of sums
      print array_sum(range($pivot + 1, $max)) - array_sum($r) . "\n";
    } else if(count($r) < $max - $pivot) {
      // mroe than 1 missing number recurse
      findMissing($r, $pivot+1, $max);
    }
  }

Demo

等一下。正如问题所述，袋子里有100个数字。无论k有多大，问题都可以在常数时间内解决，因为您可以使用一个集合，并在最多100k次循环迭代中从集合中删除数字。100是常数。剩下的数就是你的答案。

如果我们将解推广到从1到N的数字，除了N不是常数外，没有什么变化，所以我们在O(N - k) = O(N)时间内。例如，如果我们使用位集，我们在O(N)时间内将位设置为1，遍历这些数字，将位设置为0 (O(N-k) = O(N))，然后我们就得到了答案。

It seems to me that the interviewer was asking you how to print out the contents of the final set in O(k) time rather than O(N) time. Clearly, with a bit set, you have to iterate through all N bits to determine whether you should print the number or not. However, if you change the way the set is implemented you can print out the numbers in k iterations. This is done by putting the numbers into an object to be stored in both a hash set and a doubly linked list. When you remove an object from the hash set, you also remove it from the list. The answers will be left in the list which is now of length k.

我会用另一种方法来回答这个问题，询问面试官关于他试图解决的更大问题的更多细节。根据问题和围绕它的需求，显而易见的基于集的解决方案可能是正确的，而生成一个列表然后从中挑选的方法可能不是。

For example, it might be that the interviewer is going to dispatch n messages and needs to know the k that didn't result in a reply and needs to know it in as little wall clock time as possible after the n-kth reply arrives. Let's also say that the message channel's nature is such that even running at full bore, there's enough time to do some processing between messages without having any impact on how long it takes to produce the end result after the last reply arrives. That time can be put to use inserting some identifying facet of each sent message into a set and deleting it as each corresponding reply arrives. Once the last reply has arrived, the only thing to be done is to remove its identifier from the set, which in typical implementations takes O(log k+1). After that, the set contains the list of k missing elements and there's no additional processing to be done.

这当然不是批处理预先生成的数字袋的最快方法，因为整个过程运行O((log 1 + log 2 +…)+ log n) + (log n + log n-1 +…+ log k))。但它确实适用于任何k值(即使它事先不知道)，在上面的例子中，它的应用方式使最关键的区间最小化。

我不知道这是否有效，但我想建议这个解决方案。

计算这100个元素的xor 计算98个元素的xor(在2个元素被移除之后) 现在(1的结果)XOR(2的结果)给你两个缺失的no的XOR，如果a和b是缺失的元素 4.用常用的求和公式diff得到缺失的no的和，我们设diff是d。

现在运行一个循环，得到可能的对(p,q)，它们都位于[1,100]，和为d。

当获得一对时，检查(3的结果)是否XOR p = q 如果是，我们就完成了。

如果我错了，请纠正我，如果这是正确的，也请评论时间复杂性

不确定，这是否是最有效的解决方案，但我会遍历所有条目，并使用bitset来记住，设置了哪些数字，然后测试0位。

我喜欢简单的解决方案，我甚至相信，它可能比计算和，或平方和等更快。