我创建的装饰器不仅检查覆盖属性的名称是否为该属性所在类的任何超类(无需指定超类)，还检查确保覆盖属性必须与被覆盖属性的类型相同。类方法被视为方法，静态方法被视为函数。这个装饰器适用于可调用对象、类方法、静态方法和属性。

源代码见:https://github.com/fireuser909/override

此装饰器仅适用于作为重写实例的类。OverridesMeta，但是如果你的类是一个自定义元类的实例，使用create_custom_overrides_meta函数来创建一个与覆盖装饰器兼容的元类。对于测试，运行覆盖。__init__模块。

即兴对@mkorpela的伟大回答，这里有一个版本

更精确的检查、命名和引发的Error对象

def overrides(interface_class):
    """
    Function override annotation.
    Corollary to @abc.abstractmethod where the override is not of an
    abstractmethod.
    Modified from answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/8313042/471376
    """
    def confirm_override(method):
        if method.__name__ not in dir(interface_class):
            raise NotImplementedError('function "%s" is an @override but that'
                                      ' function is not implemented in base'
                                      ' class %s'
                                      % (method.__name__,
                                         interface_class)
                                      )

        def func():
            pass

        attr = getattr(interface_class, method.__name__)
        if type(attr) is not type(func):
            raise NotImplementedError('function "%s" is an @override'
                                      ' but that is implemented as type %s'
                                      ' in base class %s, expected implemented'
                                      ' type %s'
                                      % (method.__name__,
                                         type(attr),
                                         interface_class,
                                         type(func))
                                      )
        return method
    return confirm_override

下面是它在实践中的样子:

NotImplementedError未在基类中实现

class A(object):
    # ERROR: `a` is not a implemented!
    pass

class B(A):
    @overrides(A)
    def a(self):
        pass

会导致更具有描述性的NotImplementedError错误

function "a" is an @override but that function is not implemented in base class <class '__main__.A'>

完整的堆栈

Traceback (most recent call last):
  …
  File "C:/Users/user1/project.py", line 135, in <module>
    class B(A):
  File "C:/Users/user1/project.py", line 136, in B
    @overrides(A)
  File "C:/Users/user1/project.py", line 110, in confirm_override
    interface_class)
NotImplementedError: function "a" is an @override but that function is not implemented in base class <class '__main__.A'>

NotImplementedError“期望实现的类型”

class A(object):
    # ERROR: `a` is not a function!
    a = ''

class B(A):
    @overrides(A)
    def a(self):
        pass

会导致更具有描述性的NotImplementedError错误

function "a" is an @override but that is implemented as type <class 'str'> in base class <class '__main__.A'>, expected implemented type <class 'function'>

完整的堆栈

Traceback (most recent call last):
  …
  File "C:/Users/user1/project.py", line 135, in <module>
    class B(A):
  File "C:/Users/user1/project.py", line 136, in B
    @overrides(A)
  File "C:/Users/user1/project.py", line 125, in confirm_override
    type(func))
NotImplementedError: function "a" is an @override but that is implemented as type <class 'str'> in base class <class '__main__.A'>, expected implemented type <class 'function'>

@mkorpela answer的伟大之处在于检查发生在初始化阶段。检查不需要“运行”。参考前面的例子，类B从未初始化(B())，但NotImplementedError仍然会引发。这意味着可以更快地捕获覆盖错误。

下面是一个不需要指定interface_class名称的实现。

import inspect
import re

def overrides(method):
    # actually can't do this because a method is really just a function while inside a class def'n  
    #assert(inspect.ismethod(method))

    stack = inspect.stack()
    base_classes = re.search(r'class.+\((.+)\)\s*\:', stack[2][4][0]).group(1)

    # handle multiple inheritance
    base_classes = [s.strip() for s in base_classes.split(',')]
    if not base_classes:
        raise ValueError('overrides decorator: unable to determine base class') 

    # stack[0]=overrides, stack[1]=inside class def'n, stack[2]=outside class def'n
    derived_class_locals = stack[2][0].f_locals

    # replace each class name in base_classes with the actual class type
    for i, base_class in enumerate(base_classes):

        if '.' not in base_class:
            base_classes[i] = derived_class_locals[base_class]

        else:
            components = base_class.split('.')

            # obj is either a module or a class
            obj = derived_class_locals[components[0]]

            for c in components[1:]:
                assert(inspect.ismodule(obj) or inspect.isclass(obj))
                obj = getattr(obj, c)

            base_classes[i] = obj


    assert( any( hasattr(cls, method.__name__) for cls in base_classes ) )
    return method

基于这个和fwc:s的答案，我创建了一个pip可安装包https://github.com/mkorpela/overrides

我经常在这里看到这个问题。 这主要发生在(再次)在我们的代码库中看到相同的错误之后:有人在重命名“接口”中的方法时忘记了一些“接口”实现类。

好吧，Python不是Java，但Python有强大的功能——显式比隐式好——在现实世界中，有一些真实的具体案例，这个东西会帮助我。

这是overrides decorator的草图。这将检查作为参数给出的类是否与被修饰的方法具有相同的方法(或其他东西)名称。

如果你能想到一个更好的解决方案，请张贴在这里!

def overrides(interface_class):
    def overrider(method):
        assert(method.__name__ in dir(interface_class))
        return method
    return overrider

其工作原理如下:

class MySuperInterface(object):
    def my_method(self):
        print 'hello world!'


class ConcreteImplementer(MySuperInterface):
    @overrides(MySuperInterface)
    def my_method(self):
        print 'hello kitty!'

如果你做了一个错误的版本，它会在类加载时引发一个断言错误:

class ConcreteFaultyImplementer(MySuperInterface):
    @overrides(MySuperInterface)
    def your_method(self):
        print 'bye bye!'

>> AssertionError!!!!!!!

基于@mkorpela的精彩回答，我写了一个类似的包(ipromise pypi github)，它做了更多的检查:

假设A继承了B和C, B继承了C。

模块ipromise检查:

If A.f overrides B.f, B.f must exist, and A must inherit from B. (This is the check from the overrides package). You don't have the pattern A.f declares that it overrides B.f, which then declares that it overrides C.f. A should say that it overrides from C.f since B might decide to stop overriding this method, and that should not result in downstream updates. You don't have the pattern A.f declares that it overrides C.f, but B.f does not declare its override. You don't have the pattern A.f declares that it overrides C.f, but B.f declares that it overrides from some D.f.

它还具有用于标记和检查实现抽象方法的各种特性。

在python 3.6及以上版本中，@override提供的功能可以使用python的描述符协议轻松实现，即set_name dunder方法:

class override:
    def __init__(self, func):
       self._func = func
       update_wrapper(self, func)

    def __get__(self, obj, obj_type):
        if obj is None:
            return self
        return self._func

    def __set_name__(self, obj_type, name):
        self.validate_override(obj_type, name)

    def validate_override(self, obj_type, name):
        for parent in obj_type.__bases__:
            func = parent.__dict__.get(name, None)
            if callable(func):
                return
        else:
            raise NotImplementedError(f"{obj_type.__name__} does not override {name}")

注意，这里的set_name是在定义包装类之后调用的，我们可以通过调用包装类的dunder方法基来获得它的父类。

对于它的父类，我们希望检查包装的函数是否在类中通过实现

检查函数名是否在类字典中 它是可调用的

使用i就像这样简单:

class AbstractShoppingCartService:
    def add_item(self, request: AddItemRequest) -> Cart:
        ...


class ShoppingCartService(AbstractShoppingCartService):
    @override
    def add_item(self, request: AddItemRequest) -> Cart:
        ...