例如,在Java中,@Override注释不仅提供了重写的编译时检查,而且可以生成优秀的自文档代码。
我只是在寻找文档(尽管如果它是一些检查器(如pylint)的指示器,那是额外的奖励)。我可以在某处添加注释或文档字符串,但在Python中指示重写的惯用方法是什么?
例如,在Java中,@Override注释不仅提供了重写的编译时检查,而且可以生成优秀的自文档代码。
我只是在寻找文档(尽管如果它是一些检查器(如pylint)的指示器,那是额外的奖励)。我可以在某处添加注释或文档字符串,但在Python中指示重写的惯用方法是什么?
当前回答
Hear是最简单的,可以在Jython下使用Java类:
class MyClass(SomeJavaClass):
def __init__(self):
setattr(self, "name_of_method_to_override", __method_override__)
def __method_override__(self, some_args):
some_thing_to_do()
其他回答
即兴对@mkorpela的伟大回答,这里有一个版本
更精确的检查、命名和引发的Error对象
def overrides(interface_class):
"""
Function override annotation.
Corollary to @abc.abstractmethod where the override is not of an
abstractmethod.
Modified from answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/8313042/471376
"""
def confirm_override(method):
if method.__name__ not in dir(interface_class):
raise NotImplementedError('function "%s" is an @override but that'
' function is not implemented in base'
' class %s'
% (method.__name__,
interface_class)
)
def func():
pass
attr = getattr(interface_class, method.__name__)
if type(attr) is not type(func):
raise NotImplementedError('function "%s" is an @override'
' but that is implemented as type %s'
' in base class %s, expected implemented'
' type %s'
% (method.__name__,
type(attr),
interface_class,
type(func))
)
return method
return confirm_override
下面是它在实践中的样子:
NotImplementedError未在基类中实现
class A(object):
# ERROR: `a` is not a implemented!
pass
class B(A):
@overrides(A)
def a(self):
pass
会导致更具有描述性的NotImplementedError错误
function "a" is an @override but that function is not implemented in base class <class '__main__.A'>
完整的堆栈
Traceback (most recent call last):
…
File "C:/Users/user1/project.py", line 135, in <module>
class B(A):
File "C:/Users/user1/project.py", line 136, in B
@overrides(A)
File "C:/Users/user1/project.py", line 110, in confirm_override
interface_class)
NotImplementedError: function "a" is an @override but that function is not implemented in base class <class '__main__.A'>
NotImplementedError“期望实现的类型”
class A(object):
# ERROR: `a` is not a function!
a = ''
class B(A):
@overrides(A)
def a(self):
pass
会导致更具有描述性的NotImplementedError错误
function "a" is an @override but that is implemented as type <class 'str'> in base class <class '__main__.A'>, expected implemented type <class 'function'>
完整的堆栈
Traceback (most recent call last):
…
File "C:/Users/user1/project.py", line 135, in <module>
class B(A):
File "C:/Users/user1/project.py", line 136, in B
@overrides(A)
File "C:/Users/user1/project.py", line 125, in confirm_override
type(func))
NotImplementedError: function "a" is an @override but that is implemented as type <class 'str'> in base class <class '__main__.A'>, expected implemented type <class 'function'>
@mkorpela answer的伟大之处在于检查发生在初始化阶段。检查不需要“运行”。参考前面的例子,类B从未初始化(B()),但NotImplementedError仍然会引发。这意味着可以更快地捕获覆盖错误。
Hear是最简单的,可以在Jython下使用Java类:
class MyClass(SomeJavaClass):
def __init__(self):
setattr(self, "name_of_method_to_override", __method_override__)
def __method_override__(self, some_args):
some_thing_to_do()
基于@mkorpela的精彩回答,我写了一个类似的包(ipromise pypi github),它做了更多的检查:
假设A继承了B和C, B继承了C。
模块ipromise检查:
If A.f overrides B.f, B.f must exist, and A must inherit from B. (This is the check from the overrides package). You don't have the pattern A.f declares that it overrides B.f, which then declares that it overrides C.f. A should say that it overrides from C.f since B might decide to stop overriding this method, and that should not result in downstream updates. You don't have the pattern A.f declares that it overrides C.f, but B.f does not declare its override. You don't have the pattern A.f declares that it overrides C.f, but B.f declares that it overrides from some D.f.
它还具有用于标记和检查实现抽象方法的各种特性。
在Python 2.6+和Python 3.2+中,你可以这样做(实际上是模拟的,Python不支持函数重载,子类会自动覆盖父类的方法)。我们可以使用decorator。但首先,请注意Python的@decorators和Java的@Annotations是完全不同的东西。前一个是带有具体代码的包装器,后一个是编译器的标志。
为此,首先执行pip安装multipledispatch
from multipledispatch import dispatch as Override
# using alias 'Override' just to give you some feel :)
class A:
def foo(self):
print('foo in A')
# More methods here
class B(A):
@Override()
def foo(self):
print('foo in B')
@Override(int)
def foo(self,a):
print('foo in B; arg =',a)
@Override(str,float)
def foo(self,a,b):
print('foo in B; arg =',(a,b))
a=A()
b=B()
a.foo()
b.foo()
b.foo(4)
b.foo('Wheee',3.14)
输出:
foo in A
foo in B
foo in B; arg = 4
foo in B; arg = ('Wheee', 3.14)
注意,这里必须使用带有括号的decorator
需要记住的一件事是,由于Python没有直接的函数重载,所以即使类B没有继承自类A,但需要所有这些foo,也需要使用@Override(尽管在这种情况下使用别名'Overload'会更好看)
下面是一个不需要指定interface_class名称的实现。
import inspect
import re
def overrides(method):
# actually can't do this because a method is really just a function while inside a class def'n
#assert(inspect.ismethod(method))
stack = inspect.stack()
base_classes = re.search(r'class.+\((.+)\)\s*\:', stack[2][4][0]).group(1)
# handle multiple inheritance
base_classes = [s.strip() for s in base_classes.split(',')]
if not base_classes:
raise ValueError('overrides decorator: unable to determine base class')
# stack[0]=overrides, stack[1]=inside class def'n, stack[2]=outside class def'n
derived_class_locals = stack[2][0].f_locals
# replace each class name in base_classes with the actual class type
for i, base_class in enumerate(base_classes):
if '.' not in base_class:
base_classes[i] = derived_class_locals[base_class]
else:
components = base_class.split('.')
# obj is either a module or a class
obj = derived_class_locals[components[0]]
for c in components[1:]:
assert(inspect.ismodule(obj) or inspect.isclass(obj))
obj = getattr(obj, c)
base_classes[i] = obj
assert( any( hasattr(cls, method.__name__) for cls in base_classes ) )
return method