下面是一个解析时不会产生错误的函数。它处理明显的情况，失败时返回None(在CPython上默认处理最多2000个'-/+'符号!):

#!/usr/bin/env python

def get_int(number):
    splits = number.split('.')
    if len(splits) > 2:
        # too many splits
        return None
    if len(splits) == 2 and splits[1]:
        # handle decimal part recursively :-)
        if get_int(splits[1]) != 0:
            return None

    int_part = splits[0].lstrip("+")
    if int_part.startswith('-'):
        # handle minus sign recursively :-)
        return get_int(int_part[1:]) * -1
    # successful 'and' returns last truth-y value (cast is always valid)
    return int_part.isdigit() and int(int_part)

一些测试:

tests = ["0", "0.0", "0.1", "1", "1.1", "1.0", "-1", "-1.1", "-1.0", "-0", "--0", "---3", '.3', '--3.', "+13", "+-1.00", "--+123", "-0.000"]

for t in tests:
    print "get_int(%s) = %s" % (t, get_int(str(t)))

结果:

get_int(0) = 0
get_int(0.0) = 0
get_int(0.1) = None
get_int(1) = 1
get_int(1.1) = None
get_int(1.0) = 1
get_int(-1) = -1
get_int(-1.1) = None
get_int(-1.0) = -1
get_int(-0) = 0
get_int(--0) = 0
get_int(---3) = -3
get_int(.3) = None
get_int(--3.) = 3
get_int(+13) = 13
get_int(+-1.00) = -1
get_int(--+123) = 123
get_int(-0.000) = 0

如有需要，可使用:

def int_predicate(number):
     return get_int(number) is not None

正确的RegEx解决方案应该结合Greg Hewgill和Nowell的思想，但不使用全局变量。可以通过将属性附加到方法来实现这一点。另外，我知道在方法中导入是不受欢迎的，但我想要的是像http://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/Importing#lazy-imports这样的“惰性模块”效果

edit:到目前为止，我最喜欢的技术是使用String对象的独占方法。

#!/usr/bin/env python

# Uses exclusively methods of the String object
def isInteger(i):
    i = str(i)
    return i=='0' or (i if i.find('..') > -1 else i.lstrip('-+').rstrip('0').rstrip('.')).isdigit()

# Uses re module for regex
def isIntegre(i):
    import re
    if not hasattr(isIntegre, '_re'):
        print("I compile only once. Remove this line when you are confident in that.")
        isIntegre._re = re.compile(r"[-+]?\d+(\.0*)?$")
    return isIntegre._re.match(str(i)) is not None

# When executed directly run Unit Tests
if __name__ == '__main__':
    for obj in [
                # integers
                0, 1, -1, 1.0, -1.0,
                '0', '0.','0.0', '1', '-1', '+1', '1.0', '-1.0', '+1.0',
                # non-integers
                1.1, -1.1, '1.1', '-1.1', '+1.1',
                '1.1.1', '1.1.0', '1.0.1', '1.0.0',
                '1.0.', '1..0', '1..',
                '0.0.', '0..0', '0..',
                'one', object(), (1,2,3), [1,2,3], {'one':'two'}
            ]:
        # Notice the integre uses 're' (intended to be humorous)
        integer = ('an integer' if isInteger(obj) else 'NOT an integer')
        integre = ('an integre' if isIntegre(obj) else 'NOT an integre')
        # Make strings look like strings in the output
        if isinstance(obj, str):
            obj = ("'%s'" % (obj,))
        print("%30s is %14s is %14s" % (obj, integer, integre))

对于那些不太喜欢冒险的同学，输出如下:

I compile only once. Remove this line when you are confident in that.
                             0 is     an integer is     an integre
                             1 is     an integer is     an integre
                            -1 is     an integer is     an integre
                           1.0 is     an integer is     an integre
                          -1.0 is     an integer is     an integre
                           '0' is     an integer is     an integre
                          '0.' is     an integer is     an integre
                         '0.0' is     an integer is     an integre
                           '1' is     an integer is     an integre
                          '-1' is     an integer is     an integre
                          '+1' is     an integer is     an integre
                         '1.0' is     an integer is     an integre
                        '-1.0' is     an integer is     an integre
                        '+1.0' is     an integer is     an integre
                           1.1 is NOT an integer is NOT an integre
                          -1.1 is NOT an integer is NOT an integre
                         '1.1' is NOT an integer is NOT an integre
                        '-1.1' is NOT an integer is NOT an integre
                        '+1.1' is NOT an integer is NOT an integre
                       '1.1.1' is NOT an integer is NOT an integre
                       '1.1.0' is NOT an integer is NOT an integre
                       '1.0.1' is NOT an integer is NOT an integre
                       '1.0.0' is NOT an integer is NOT an integre
                        '1.0.' is NOT an integer is NOT an integre
                        '1..0' is NOT an integer is NOT an integre
                         '1..' is NOT an integer is NOT an integre
                        '0.0.' is NOT an integer is NOT an integre
                        '0..0' is NOT an integer is NOT an integre
                         '0..' is NOT an integer is NOT an integre
                         'one' is NOT an integer is NOT an integre
<object object at 0x103b7d0a0> is NOT an integer is NOT an integre
                     (1, 2, 3) is NOT an integer is NOT an integre
                     [1, 2, 3] is NOT an integer is NOT an integre
                {'one': 'two'} is NOT an integer is NOT an integre

如果你想只接受低ascii码的数字，这里有这样做的测试:

Python 3.7+:(u.isdecimal() and u.isascii()))

Python <= 3.6:(u.isdecimal() and u == str(int(u)))

其他答案建议使用.isdigit()或.isdecimal()，但它们都包含一些上unicode字符，如'缌' (u'\u0662'):

u = u'\u0662'     # '٢'
u.isdigit()       # True
u.isdecimal()     # True
u.isascii()       # False (Python 3.7+ only)
u == str(int(u))  # False

对于正整数，可以使用.isdigit:

>>> '16'.isdigit()
True

但它对负整数不起作用。假设您可以尝试以下方法:

>>> s = '-17'
>>> s.startswith('-') and s[1:].isdigit()
True

它不适用于'16.0'格式，在这个意义上，'16.0'格式类似于int类型强制转换。

编辑:

def check_int(s):
    if s[0] in ('-', '+'):
        return s[1:].isdigit()
    return s.isdigit()

我的建议如下:

import ast

def is_int(s):
    return isinstance(ast.literal_eval(s), int)

从文档中可以看出:

安全地计算表达式节点或包含Python文字或容器显示的字符串。提供的字符串或节点只能由以下Python文字结构组成:字符串、字节、数字、元组、列表、字典、集、布尔值和None。

我应该指出，当对任何不构成Python文字的内容调用时，这将引发ValueError异常。因为这个问题要求一个没有try/except的解决方案，我有一个Kobayashi-Maru类型的解决方案:

from ast import literal_eval
from contextlib import suppress

def is_int(s):
    with suppress(ValueError):
        return isinstance(literal_eval(s), int)
    return False

¯\_(五)_/¯

我一直这样做，我对使用try/except模式有一种温和但不可否认的非理性厌恶。我用这个:

all([xi in '1234567890' for xi in x])

它不包含负数，所以你可以去掉左边所有的负号，然后检查结果是否包含0-9之间的数字:

all([xi in '1234567890' for xi in x.lstrip('-')])

如果你不确定输入是字符串，你也可以将x传递给str():

all([xi in '1234567890' for xi in str(x).lstrip('-')])

有一些(边缘?)情况下，这是行不通的:

It doesn't work for various scientific and/or exponential notations (e.g. 1.2E3, 10^3, etc.) - both will return False. I don't think other answers accommodated this either, and even Python 3.8 has inconsistent opinions, since type(1E2) gives <class 'float'> whereas type(10^2) gives <class 'int'>. An empty string input gives True. A leading plus sign (e.g. "+7") gives False. Multiple minus signs are ignored so long as they're leading characters. This behavior is similar to the python interpreter* in that type(---1) returns <class int>. However, it isn't completely consistent with the interpreter in that int('---1') gives an error, but my solution returns True with the same input.

所以它不会对所有可能的输入都有效，但如果你能排除这些，这是一个OK的单行检查，如果x不是整数返回False，如果x是整数返回True。但是如果你真的想要精确模拟int()内置的行为，你最好使用try/except。

我不知道这是否是python式的，但它只有一行，而且代码的功能相对清晰。

我并不是说解释器忽略了前导负号，只是说任何数量的前导负号都不会改变结果是整数。Int(——1)实际上被解释为-(-1)或1。Int(——1)被解释为-(-(-1))，或者-1。所以前面有偶数个负号就会得到一个正整数，前面有奇数个负号就会得到一个负整数，但结果总是整数。