下面是@Jean-Paul为Arduino微控制器设计的平滑z分数的C语言实现，用于获取加速度计读数，并判断撞击的方向是来自左边还是右边。这表现得非常好，因为这个设备返回一个反弹信号。这是设备对峰值检测算法的输入-显示了来自右边的冲击，然后是来自左边的冲击。你可以看到最初的峰值然后传感器的振荡。

#include <stdio.h>
#include <math.h>
#include <string.h>


#define SAMPLE_LENGTH 1000

float stddev(float data[], int len);
float mean(float data[], int len);
void thresholding(float y[], int signals[], int lag, float threshold, float influence);


void thresholding(float y[], int signals[], int lag, float threshold, float influence) {
    memset(signals, 0, sizeof(int) * SAMPLE_LENGTH);
    float filteredY[SAMPLE_LENGTH];
    memcpy(filteredY, y, sizeof(float) * SAMPLE_LENGTH);
    float avgFilter[SAMPLE_LENGTH];
    float stdFilter[SAMPLE_LENGTH];

    avgFilter[lag - 1] = mean(y, lag);
    stdFilter[lag - 1] = stddev(y, lag);

    for (int i = lag; i < SAMPLE_LENGTH; i++) {
        if (fabsf(y[i] - avgFilter[i-1]) > threshold * stdFilter[i-1]) {
            if (y[i] > avgFilter[i-1]) {
                signals[i] = 1;
            } else {
                signals[i] = -1;
            }
            filteredY[i] = influence * y[i] + (1 - influence) * filteredY[i-1];
        } else {
            signals[i] = 0;
        }
        avgFilter[i] = mean(filteredY + i-lag, lag);
        stdFilter[i] = stddev(filteredY + i-lag, lag);
    }
}

float mean(float data[], int len) {
    float sum = 0.0, mean = 0.0;

    int i;
    for(i=0; i<len; ++i) {
        sum += data[i];
    }

    mean = sum/len;
    return mean;


}

float stddev(float data[], int len) {
    float the_mean = mean(data, len);
    float standardDeviation = 0.0;

    int i;
    for(i=0; i<len; ++i) {
        standardDeviation += pow(data[i] - the_mean, 2);
    }

    return sqrt(standardDeviation/len);
}

int main() {
    printf("Hello, World!\n");
    int lag = 100;
    float threshold = 5;
    float influence = 0;
    float y[]=  {1,1,1.1,1,0.9,1,1,1.1,1,0.9,1,1.1,1,1,0.9,1,1,1.1,1,1,1,1,1.1,0.9,1,1.1,1,1,0.9,
  ....
1,1.1,1,1,1.1,1,0.8,0.9,1,1.2,0.9,1,1,1.1,1.2,1,1.5,1,3,2,5,3,2,1,1,1,0.9,1,1,3,       2.6,4,3,3.2,2,1,1,0.8,4,4,2,2.5,1,1,1,1.2,1,1.5,1,3,2,5,3,2,1,1,1,0.9,1,1,3,
       2.6,4,3,3.2,2,1,1,0.8,4,4,2,2.5,1,1,1}

    int signal[SAMPLE_LENGTH];

    thresholding(y, signal,  lag, threshold, influence);

    return 0;
}

她的结果是影响= 0

不是很好，但这里的影响力= 1

这很好。

不需要将极大值与平均值进行比较，还可以将极大值与相邻的最小值进行比较，其中最小值仅定义在噪声阈值之上。 如果局部最大值是>的3倍(或其他置信因子)相邻的最小值，那么这个最大值就是一个峰值。 移动窗口越宽，峰值的确定越准确。 上面使用了以窗口中间为中心的计算， 顺便说一下，而不是在窗口结束时计算(== lag)。

请注意，最大值必须被视为信号之前的增加 之后下降。

一个python/numpy的迭代版本的答案https://stackoverflow.com/a/22640362/6029703在这里。对于大数据(100000+)，此代码比计算平均和标准偏差的速度更快。

def peak_detection_smoothed_zscore_v2(x, lag, threshold, influence):
    '''
    iterative smoothed z-score algorithm
    Implementation of algorithm from https://stackoverflow.com/a/22640362/6029703
    '''
    import numpy as np
    labels = np.zeros(len(x))
    filtered_y = np.array(x)
    avg_filter = np.zeros(len(x))
    std_filter = np.zeros(len(x))
    var_filter = np.zeros(len(x))

    avg_filter[lag - 1] = np.mean(x[0:lag])
    std_filter[lag - 1] = np.std(x[0:lag])
    var_filter[lag - 1] = np.var(x[0:lag])
    for i in range(lag, len(x)):
        if abs(x[i] - avg_filter[i - 1]) > threshold * std_filter[i - 1]:
            if x[i] > avg_filter[i - 1]:
                labels[i] = 1
            else:
                labels[i] = -1
            filtered_y[i] = influence * x[i] + (1 - influence) * filtered_y[i - 1]
        else:
            labels[i] = 0
            filtered_y[i] = x[i]
        # update avg, var, std
        avg_filter[i] = avg_filter[i - 1] + 1. / lag * (filtered_y[i] - filtered_y[i - lag])
        var_filter[i] = var_filter[i - 1] + 1. / lag * ((filtered_y[i] - avg_filter[i - 1]) ** 2 - (
            filtered_y[i - lag] - avg_filter[i - 1]) ** 2 - (filtered_y[i] - filtered_y[i - lag]) ** 2 / lag)
        std_filter[i] = np.sqrt(var_filter[i])

    return dict(signals=labels,
                avgFilter=avg_filter,
                stdFilter=std_filter)

一种方法是根据以下观察来检测峰:

时间t是一个峰值(y (t) > y (t - 1)) & & ((t) > y (t + 1))

它通过等待上升趋势结束来避免误报。它并不完全是“实时”的，因为它会比峰值差一个dt。灵敏度可以通过要求比较的裕度来控制。在噪声检测和时延检测之间存在一种折衷。 您可以通过添加更多参数来丰富模型:

峰如果y (y (t) - (t-dt) > m) && (y (t) - y (t + dt) > m)

dt和m是控制灵敏度和延时的参数

这是你用上述算法得到的结果:

下面是在python中重现图的代码:

import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
input = np.array([ 1. ,  1. ,  1. ,  1. ,  1. ,  1. ,  1. ,  1.1,  1. ,  0.8,  0.9,
    1. ,  1.2,  0.9,  1. ,  1. ,  1.1,  1.2,  1. ,  1.5,  1. ,  3. ,
    2. ,  5. ,  3. ,  2. ,  1. ,  1. ,  1. ,  0.9,  1. ,  1. ,  3. ,
    2.6,  4. ,  3. ,  3.2,  2. ,  1. ,  1. ,  1. ,  1. ,  1. ])
signal = (input > np.roll(input,1)) & (input > np.roll(input,-1))
plt.plot(input)
plt.plot(signal.nonzero()[0], input[signal], 'ro')
plt.show()

通过设置m = 0.5，你可以得到一个更清晰的信号，只有一个假阳性:

我认为delica的Python回答器有一个bug。我不能评论他的帖子，因为我没有代表来做这件事，编辑队列已经满了，所以我可能不是第一个注意到它的人。

avgFilter[lag - 1]和stdFilter[lag - 1]在init中设置，然后在lag == i时再次设置，而不是改变[lag]值。这个结果使得第一个信号总是1。

以下是带有轻微修正的代码:

import numpy as np

class real_time_peak_detection():
    def __init__(self, array, lag, threshold, influence):
        self.y = list(array)
        self.length = len(self.y)
        self.lag = lag
        self.threshold = threshold
        self.influence = influence
        self.signals = [0] * len(self.y)
        self.filteredY = np.array(self.y).tolist()
        self.avgFilter = [0] * len(self.y)
        self.stdFilter = [0] * len(self.y)
        self.avgFilter[self.lag - 1] = np.mean(self.y[0:self.lag]).tolist()
        self.stdFilter[self.lag - 1] = np.std(self.y[0:self.lag]).tolist()

    def thresholding_algo(self, new_value):
        self.y.append(new_value)
        i = len(self.y) - 1
        self.length = len(self.y)
        if i < self.lag:
            return 0
        elif i == self.lag:
            self.signals = [0] * len(self.y)
            self.filteredY = np.array(self.y).tolist()
            self.avgFilter = [0] * len(self.y)
            self.stdFilter = [0] * len(self.y)
            self.avgFilter[self.lag] = np.mean(self.y[0:self.lag]).tolist()
            self.stdFilter[self.lag] = np.std(self.y[0:self.lag]).tolist()
            return 0

        self.signals += [0]
        self.filteredY += [0]
        self.avgFilter += [0]
        self.stdFilter += [0]

        if abs(self.y[i] - self.avgFilter[i - 1]) > self.threshold * self.stdFilter[i - 1]:
            if self.y[i] > self.avgFilter[i - 1]:
                self.signals[i] = 1
            else:
                self.signals[i] = -1

            self.filteredY[i] = self.influence * self.y[i] + (1 - self.influence) * self.filteredY[i - 1]
            self.avgFilter[i] = np.mean(self.filteredY[(i - self.lag):i])
            self.stdFilter[i] = np.std(self.filteredY[(i - self.lag):i])
        else:
            self.signals[i] = 0
            self.filteredY[i] = self.y[i]
            self.avgFilter[i] = np.mean(self.filteredY[(i - self.lag):i])
            self.stdFilter[i] = np.std(self.filteredY[(i - self.lag):i])

        return self.signals[i]

用现代c++实现的面向对象版z-score算法

template<typename T>
class FindPeaks{
private:
    std::vector<T> m_input_signal;                      // stores input vector
    std::vector<T> m_array_peak_positive;               
    std::vector<T> m_array_peak_negative;               

public:
    FindPeaks(const std::vector<T>& t_input_signal): m_input_signal{t_input_signal}{ }

    void estimate(){
        int lag{5};
        T threshold{ 5 };                                                                                       // set a threshold
        T influence{ 0.5 };                                                                                    // value between 0 to 1, 1 is normal influence and 0.5 is half the influence

        std::vector<T> filtered_signal(m_input_signal.size(), 0.0);                                             // placeholdered for smooth signal, initialie with all zeros
        std::vector<int> signal(m_input_signal.size(), 0);                                                          // vector that stores where the negative and positive located
        std::vector<T> avg_filtered(m_input_signal.size(), 0.0);                                                // moving averages
        std::vector<T> std_filtered(m_input_signal.size(), 0.0);                                                // moving standard deviation

        avg_filtered[lag] = findMean(m_input_signal.begin(), m_input_signal.begin() + lag);                         // pass the iteartor to vector
        std_filtered[lag] = findStandardDeviation(m_input_signal.begin(), m_input_signal.begin() + lag);

        for (size_t iLag = lag + 1; iLag < m_input_signal.size(); ++iLag) {                                         // start index frm 
            if (std::abs(m_input_signal[iLag] - avg_filtered[iLag - 1]) > threshold * std_filtered[iLag - 1]) {     // check if value is above threhold             
                if ((m_input_signal[iLag]) > avg_filtered[iLag - 1]) {
                    signal[iLag] = 1;                                                                               // assign positive signal
                }
                else {
                    signal[iLag] = -1;                                                                                  // assign negative signal
                }
                filtered_signal[iLag] = influence * m_input_signal[iLag] + (1 - influence) * filtered_signal[iLag - 1];        // exponential smoothing
            }
            else {
                signal[iLag] = 0;                                                                                         // no signal
                filtered_signal[iLag] = m_input_signal[iLag];
            }

            avg_filtered[iLag] = findMean(filtered_signal.begin() + (iLag - lag), filtered_signal.begin() + iLag);
            std_filtered[iLag] = findStandardDeviation(filtered_signal.begin() + (iLag - lag), filtered_signal.begin() + iLag);

        }

        for (size_t iSignal = 0; iSignal < m_input_signal.size(); ++iSignal) {
            if (signal[iSignal] == 1) {
                m_array_peak_positive.emplace_back(m_input_signal[iSignal]);                                        // store the positive peaks
            }
            else if (signal[iSignal] == -1) {
                m_array_peak_negative.emplace_back(m_input_signal[iSignal]);                                         // store the negative peaks
            }
        }
        printVoltagePeaks(signal, m_input_signal);

    }

    std::pair< std::vector<T>, std::vector<T> > get_peaks()
    {
        return std::make_pair(m_array_peak_negative, m_array_peak_negative);
    }

};


template<typename T1, typename T2 >
void printVoltagePeaks(std::vector<T1>& m_signal, std::vector<T2>& m_input_signal) {
    std::ofstream output_file("./voltage_peak.csv");
    std::ostream_iterator<T2> output_iterator_voltage(output_file, ",");
    std::ostream_iterator<T1> output_iterator_signal(output_file, ",");
    std::copy(m_input_signal.begin(), m_input_signal.end(), output_iterator_voltage);
    output_file << "\n";
    std::copy(m_signal.begin(), m_signal.end(), output_iterator_signal);
}

template<typename iterator_type>
typename std::iterator_traits<iterator_type>::value_type findMean(iterator_type it, iterator_type end)
{
    /* function that receives iterator to*/
    typename std::iterator_traits<iterator_type>::value_type sum{ 0.0 };
    int counter = 0;
    while (it != end) {
        sum += *(it++);
        counter++;
    }
    return sum / counter;
}

template<typename iterator_type>
typename std::iterator_traits<iterator_type>::value_type findStandardDeviation(iterator_type it, iterator_type end)
{
    auto mean = findMean(it, end);
    typename std::iterator_traits<iterator_type>::value_type sum_squared_error{ 0.0 };
    int counter{ 0 };
    while (it != end) {
        sum_squared_error += std::pow((*(it++) - mean), 2);
        counter++;
    }
    auto standard_deviation = std::sqrt(sum_squared_error / (counter - 1));
    return standard_deviation;
}