我有一个带有两个类方法的类(使用classmethod()函数),用于获取和设置本质上是静态变量的类。我尝试使用property()函数来处理这些,但它会导致错误。我能够在解释器中重现以下错误:

class Foo(object):
    _var = 5
    @classmethod
    def getvar(cls):
        return cls._var
    @classmethod
    def setvar(cls, value):
        cls._var = value
    var = property(getvar, setvar)

我可以演示类方法,但它们不能作为属性:

>>> f = Foo()
>>> f.getvar()
5
>>> f.setvar(4)
>>> f.getvar()
4
>>> f.var
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
TypeError: 'classmethod' object is not callable
>>> f.var=5
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
TypeError: 'classmethod' object is not callable

是否可以使用属性()函数与@classmethod装饰函数?


当前回答

在搜索了不同的地方之后,我找到了一个定义classproperty的方法 适用于Python 2和3。

from future.utils import with_metaclass

class BuilderMetaClass(type):
    @property
    def load_namespaces(self):
        return (self.__sourcepath__)

class BuilderMixin(with_metaclass(BuilderMetaClass, object)):
    __sourcepath__ = 'sp'        

print(BuilderMixin.load_namespaces)

希望这能帮助到一些人:)

其他回答

我找到了一个解决这个问题的简单方法。它是一个叫做classutilities的包(pip install classutilities),请参阅这里关于PyPi的文档。

考虑的例子:

import classutilities

class SomeClass(classutilities.ClassPropertiesMixin):
    _some_variable = 8  # Some encapsulated class variable

    @classutilities.classproperty
    def some_variable(cls):  # class property getter
        return cls._some_variable

    @some_variable.setter
    def some_variable(cls, value):  # class property setter
        cls._some_variable = value

你可以在类级和实例级使用它:

# Getter on class level:
value = SomeClass.some_variable
print(value)  # >>> 8
# Getter on instance level
inst = SomeClass()
value = inst.some_variable
print(value)  # >>> 8

# Setter on class level:
new_value = 9
SomeClass.some_variable = new_value
print(SomeClass.some_variable)   # >>> 9
print(SomeClass._some_variable)  # >>> 9
# Setter on instance level
inst = SomeClass()
inst.some_variable = new_value
print(SomeClass.some_variable)   # >>> 9
print(SomeClass._some_variable)  # >>> 9
print(inst.some_variable)        # >>> 9
print(inst._some_variable)       # >>> 9

如您所见,它在所有情况下都能正常工作。

尝试一下,它可以在不更改/添加大量现有代码的情况下完成工作。

>>> class foo(object):
...     _var = 5
...     def getvar(cls):
...         return cls._var
...     getvar = classmethod(getvar)
...     def setvar(cls, value):
...         cls._var = value
...     setvar = classmethod(setvar)
...     var = property(lambda self: self.getvar(), lambda self, val: self.setvar(val))
...
>>> f = foo()
>>> f.var
5
>>> f.var = 3
>>> f.var
3

属性函数需要两个可调用参数。给它们lambda包装器(它将实例作为第一个参数传递),一切都很好。

在Python 3.9中,你可以同时使用它们,但是(正如@xgt的评论所指出的)它在Python 3.11中已被弃用,所以不建议使用它。

查看此处的版本备注:

https://docs.python.org/3.11/library/functions.html#classmethod

然而,它过去是这样工作的:

class G:
    @classmethod
    @property
    def __doc__(cls):
        return f'A doc for {cls.__name__!r}'

顺序很重要——由于描述符的交互方式,@classmethod必须在最上面。

没有合理的方法使这个“类属性”系统在Python中工作。

这里有一个不合理的方法。当然,您可以通过增加元类魔法使其更加无缝。

class ClassProperty(object):
    def __init__(self, getter, setter):
        self.getter = getter
        self.setter = setter
    def __get__(self, cls, owner):
        return getattr(cls, self.getter)()
    def __set__(self, cls, value):
        getattr(cls, self.setter)(value)

class MetaFoo(type):
    var = ClassProperty('getvar', 'setvar')

class Foo(object):
    __metaclass__ = MetaFoo
    _var = 5
    @classmethod
    def getvar(cls):
        print "Getting var =", cls._var
        return cls._var
    @classmethod
    def setvar(cls, value):
        print "Setting var =", value
        cls._var = value

x = Foo.var
print "Foo.var = ", x
Foo.var = 42
x = Foo.var
print "Foo.var = ", x

问题的症结在于,属性就是Python所说的“描述符”。没有简单的方法来解释这种元编程是如何工作的,所以我必须指向描述符howto。

只有当您正在实现一个相当高级的框架时,才需要了解这类事情。比如透明对象持久化或RPC系统,或者一种领域特定的语言。

然而,在对之前答案的评论中,你说你

需要修改一个属性,使其能够被类的所有实例看到,并且在调用这些类方法的作用域中没有对类的所有实例的引用。

在我看来,您真正想要的是Observer设计模式。

这里有一个解决方案,它应该既适用于通过类访问,也适用于通过使用元类的实例访问。

In [1]: class ClassPropertyMeta(type):
   ...:     @property
   ...:     def prop(cls):
   ...:         return cls._prop
   ...:     def __new__(cls, name, parents, dct):
   ...:         # This makes overriding __getattr__ and __setattr__ in the class impossible, but should be fixable
   ...:         dct['__getattr__'] = classmethod(lambda cls, attr: getattr(cls, attr))
   ...:         dct['__setattr__'] = classmethod(lambda cls, attr, val: setattr(cls, attr, val))
   ...:         return super(ClassPropertyMeta, cls).__new__(cls, name, parents, dct)
   ...:

In [2]: class ClassProperty(object):
   ...:     __metaclass__ = ClassPropertyMeta
   ...:     _prop = 42
   ...:     def __getattr__(self, attr):
   ...:         raise Exception('Never gets called')
   ...:

In [3]: ClassProperty.prop
Out[3]: 42

In [4]: ClassProperty.prop = 1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
AttributeError                            Traceback (most recent call last)
<ipython-input-4-e2e8b423818a> in <module>()
----> 1 ClassProperty.prop = 1

AttributeError: can't set attribute

In [5]: cp = ClassProperty()

In [6]: cp.prop
Out[6]: 42

In [7]: cp.prop = 1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
AttributeError                            Traceback (most recent call last)
<ipython-input-7-e8284a3ee950> in <module>()
----> 1 cp.prop = 1

<ipython-input-1-16b7c320d521> in <lambda>(cls, attr, val)
      6         # This makes overriding __getattr__ and __setattr__ in the class impossible, but should be fixable
      7         dct['__getattr__'] = classmethod(lambda cls, attr: getattr(cls, attr))
----> 8         dct['__setattr__'] = classmethod(lambda cls, attr, val: setattr(cls, attr, val))
      9         return super(ClassPropertyMeta, cls).__new__(cls, name, parents, dct)

AttributeError: can't set attribute

这也适用于元类中定义的setter。