你应该使用Collections.shuffle()。但是，不能直接操作原始类型数组，因此需要创建包装器类。

试试这个。

public static void shuffle(int[] array) {
    Collections.shuffle(new AbstractList<Integer>() {
        @Override public Integer get(int index) { return array[index]; }
        @Override public int size() { return array.length; }
        @Override public Integer set(int index, Integer element) {
            int result = array[index];
            array[index] = element;
            return result;
        }
    });
}

And

int[] solutionArray = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1};
shuffle(solutionArray);
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(solutionArray));

输出:

[3, 3, 4, 1, 6, 2, 2, 1, 5, 6, 5, 4]

我在权衡这个非常流行的问题，因为没有人写过一个shuffle-copy版本。样式大量借鉴了Arrays.java，因为现在谁没有掠夺Java技术呢?包括泛型和int实现。

   /**
    * Shuffles elements from {@code original} into a newly created array.
    *
    * @param original the original array
    * @return the new, shuffled array
    * @throws NullPointerException if {@code original == null}
    */
   @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
   public static <T> T[] shuffledCopy(T[] original) {
      int originalLength = original.length; // For exception priority compatibility.
      Random random = new Random();
      T[] result = (T[]) Array.newInstance(original.getClass().getComponentType(), originalLength);

      for (int i = 0; i < originalLength; i++) {
         int j = random.nextInt(i+1);
         result[i] = result[j];
         result[j] = original[i];
      }

      return result;
   }


   /**
    * Shuffles elements from {@code original} into a newly created array.
    *
    * @param original the original array
    * @return the new, shuffled array
    * @throws NullPointerException if {@code original == null}
    */
   public static int[] shuffledCopy(int[] original) {
      int originalLength = original.length;
      Random random = new Random();
      int[] result = new int[originalLength];

      for (int i = 0; i < originalLength; i++) {
         int j = random.nextInt(i+1);
         result[i] = result[j];
         result[j] = original[i];
      }

      return result;
   }

下面是数组的泛型版本:

import java.util.Random;

public class Shuffle<T> {

    private final Random rnd;

    public Shuffle() {
        rnd = new Random();
    }

    /**
     * Fisher–Yates shuffle.
     */
    public void shuffle(T[] ar) {
        for (int i = ar.length - 1; i > 0; i--) {
            int index = rnd.nextInt(i + 1);
            T a = ar[index];
            ar[index] = ar[i];
            ar[i] = a;
        }
    }
}

考虑到ArrayList基本上只是一个数组，使用ArrayList而不是显式数组并使用Collections.shuffle()可能是明智的。但是，性能测试并没有显示上述方法与Collections.sort()之间有任何显著差异:

Shuffe<Integer>.shuffle(...) performance: 576084 shuffles per second
Collections.shuffle(ArrayList<Integer>) performance: 629400 shuffles per second
MathArrays.shuffle(int[]) performance: 53062 shuffles per second

Apache Commons实现MathArrays。Shuffle限制为int[]，性能损失可能是由于使用了随机数生成器。

看看Collections类，特别是shuffle(…)。

你现在可以使用java 8了:

Collections.addAll(list, arr);
Collections.shuffle(list);
cardsList.toArray(arr);

public class ShuffleArray {
public static void shuffleArray(int[] a) {
    int n = a.length;
    Random random = new Random();
    random.nextInt();
    for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
        int change = i + random.nextInt(n - i);
        swap(a, i, change);
    }
}

private static void swap(int[] a, int i, int change) {
    int helper = a[i];
    a[i] = a[change];
    a[change] = helper;
}

public static void main(String[] args) {
    int[] a = new int[] { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 };
    shuffleArray(a);
    for (int i : a) {
        System.out.println(i);
    }
}
}