Try-catch是用来帮助异常处理的。这意味着它将在某种程度上帮助我们的系统变得更加健壮:尝试从意外事件中恢复。
我们怀疑在执行和指令(发送消息)时可能会发生一些事情，因此它被包含在try中。如果发生了几乎意想不到的事情，我们可以做些什么:我们编写捕获。我不认为我们调用只是为了记录异常。我认为catch块是为了给我们从错误中恢复的机会。
现在，假设我们从错误中恢复，因为我们可以修复错误。如果能再试一次，那就太好了:
try{ some_instruction(); }
catch (NearlyUnexpectedException e){
fix_the_problem();
retry;
}
这将很快陷入永恒循环，但让我们假设fix_the_problem返回true，然后重试。假设在Java中没有这样的东西，你将如何解决这个问题?你认为解决这个问题的最佳设计代码是什么?
这就像一个哲学问题，因为我已经知道Java不直接支持我所要求的内容。
当前回答
https://onlinegdb.com/a-7RsL1Gh
public void doSomething() throws Exception{
final int MAX_TRIES = 10;
int count = 0;
while(count++ < MAX_TRIES){
try{
System.out.println("trying");
causeIssue(count); // throws error/exception till count 2
System.out.println("trying successful");
break; // break on success
} catch (Exception e){
System.out.println("caught, logging Exception:" + count);
} catch (Error e){
System.out.println("caught, logging Error:" + count);
}
}
}
输出:
trying
caught, logging Error:1
trying
caught, logging Error:2
trying
trying successful
其他回答
如果它是有用的，可以考虑更多的选项，所有放在一起(停止文件而不是重试，睡眠，继续更大的循环)都可能有帮助。
bigLoop:
while(!stopFileExists()) {
try {
// do work
break;
}
catch (ExpectedExceptionType e) {
// could sleep in here, too.
// another option would be to "restart" some bigger loop, like
continue bigLoop;
}
// ... more work
}
Spring AOP和基于注释的解决方案:
用法(@RetryOperation是作业的自定义注释):
@RetryOperation(retryCount = 1, waitSeconds = 10)
boolean someMethod() throws Exception {
}
要做到这一点，我们需要做两件事:1。注释接口;一个春天的方面。下面是实现这些的一种方法:
标注接口:
import java.lang.annotation.*;
@Target(ElementType.METHOD)
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
public @interface RetryOperation {
int retryCount();
int waitSeconds();
}
春季相位:
import org.aspectj.lang.ProceedingJoinPoint;
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Around;
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Aspect;
import org.aspectj.lang.reflect.MethodSignature;
import org.slf4j.Logger;
import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;
import org.springframework.stereotype.Component;
import java.lang.reflect.Method;
@Aspect @Component
public class RetryAspect {
private static final Logger LOGGER = LoggerFactory.getLogger(RetryAspect.class);
@Around(value = "@annotation(RetryOperation)")
public Object retryOperation(ProceedingJoinPoint joinPoint) throws Throwable {
Object response = null;
Method method = ((MethodSignature) joinPoint.getSignature()).getMethod();
RetryOperation annotation = method.getAnnotation(RetryOperation.class);
int retryCount = annotation.retryCount();
int waitSeconds = annotation.waitSeconds();
boolean successful = false;
do {
try {
response = joinPoint.proceed();
successful = true;
} catch (Exception ex) {
LOGGER.info("Operation failed, retries remaining: {}", retryCount);
retryCount--;
if (retryCount < 0) {
throw ex;
}
if (waitSeconds > 0) {
LOGGER.info("Waiting for {} second(s) before next retry", waitSeconds);
Thread.sleep(waitSeconds * 1000l);
}
}
} while (!successful);
return response;
}
}
你需要像这样在while循环中封装try-catch: -
int count = 0;
int maxTries = 3;
while(true) {
try {
// Some Code
// break out of loop, or return, on success
} catch (SomeException e) {
// handle exception
if (++count == maxTries) throw e;
}
}
我已经采取了count和maxTries，以避免运行到一个无限循环，以防异常继续发生在你的try块。
这些答案基本上都是一样的。我的也是，但我喜欢这种形式
boolean completed = false;
Throwable lastException = null;
for (int tryCount=0; tryCount < config.MAX_SOME_OPERATION_RETRIES; tryCount++)
{
try {
completed = some_operation();
break;
}
catch (UnlikelyException e) {
lastException = e;
fix_the_problem();
}
}
if (!completed) {
reportError(lastException);
}
https://github.com/tusharmndr/retry-function-wrapper/tree/master/src/main/java/io
int MAX_RETRY = 3;
RetryUtil.<Boolean>retry(MAX_RETRY,() -> {
//Function to retry
return true;
});
