这不是精确与否的问题，也不是精确与否的问题。这是一个满足以10为底而不是以2为底计算的人的期望的问题。例如，在财务计算中使用双精度值不会产生数学意义上的“错误”答案，但它可以产生财务意义上不期望的答案。

即使您在输出前的最后一分钟舍入结果，您仍然可以偶尔使用与期望不匹配的双精度结果。

Using a calculator, or calculating results by hand, 1.40 * 165 = 231 exactly. However, internally using doubles, on my compiler / operating system environment, it is stored as a binary number close to 230.99999... so if you truncate the number, you get 230 instead of 231. You may reason that rounding instead of truncating would have given the desired result of 231. That is true, but rounding always involves truncation. Whatever rounding technique you use, there are still boundary conditions like this one that will round down when you expect it to round up. They are rare enough that they often will not be found through casual testing or observation. You may have to write some code to search for examples that illustrate outcomes that do not behave as expected.

Assume you want to round something to the nearest penny. So you take your final result, multiply by 100, add 0.5, truncate, then divide the result by 100 to get back to pennies. If the internal number you stored was 3.46499999.... instead of 3.465, you are going to get 3.46 instead 3.47 when you round the number to the nearest penny. But your base 10 calculations may have indicated that the answer should be 3.465 exactly, which clearly should round up to 3.47, not down to 3.46. These kinds of things happen occasionally in real life when you use doubles for financial calculations. It is rare, so it often goes unnoticed as an issue, but it happens.

如果您使用以10为基数进行内部计算，而不是使用双数，则如果您的代码中没有其他错误，那么结果总是完全符合人类的预期。

The result of floating point number is not exact, which makes them unsuitable for any financial calculation which requires exact result and not approximation. float and double are designed for engineering and scientific calculation and many times doesn’t produce exact result also result of floating point calculation may vary from JVM to JVM. Look at below example of BigDecimal and double primitive which is used to represent money value, its quite clear that floating point calculation may not be exact and one should use BigDecimal for financial calculations.

    // floating point calculation
    final double amount1 = 2.0;
    final double amount2 = 1.1;
    System.out.println("difference between 2.0 and 1.1 using double is: " + (amount1 - amount2));

    // Use BigDecimal for financial calculation
    final BigDecimal amount3 = new BigDecimal("2.0");
    final BigDecimal amount4 = new BigDecimal("1.1");
    System.out.println("difference between 2.0 and 1.1 using BigDecimal is: " + (amount3.subtract(amount4)));

输出:

difference between 2.0 and 1.1 using double is: 0.8999999999999999
difference between 2.0 and 1.1 using BigDecimal is: 0.9

美国货币可以很容易地用美元和美分来表示。整数是100%精确的，而浮点二进制数并不完全匹配浮点小数。

虽然浮点类型确实只能表示近似的十进制数据，但如果在表示数字之前将数字舍入到必要的精度，则可以获得正确的结果。通常。

通常是因为双排精度小于16位。如果你要求更高的精度，这不是一个合适的类型。近似也可以累积。

必须指出的是，即使您使用定点算术，您仍然必须对数字进行四舍五入，如果不是因为BigInteger和BigDecimal在获得周期性小数时会给出错误。所以这里也有一个近似。

例如，历史上用于财务计算的COBOL的最大精度为18位数字。所以通常会有一个隐含的舍入。

总之，在我看来，双精度主要不适合它的16位精度，这可能是不够的，而不是因为它是近似值。

考虑以下后续程序的输出。它表明，在舍入double后，得到与BigDecimal相同的结果，精度为16。

Precision 14
------------------------------------------------------
BigDecimalNoRound             : 56789.012345 / 1111111111 = Non-terminating decimal expansion; no exact representable decimal result.
DoubleNoRound                 : 56789.012345 / 1111111111 = 5.111011111561101E-5
BigDecimal                    : 56789.012345 / 1111111111 = 0.000051110111115611
Double                        : 56789.012345 / 1111111111 = 0.000051110111115611

Precision 15
------------------------------------------------------
BigDecimalNoRound             : 56789.012345 / 1111111111 = Non-terminating decimal expansion; no exact representable decimal result.
DoubleNoRound                 : 56789.012345 / 1111111111 = 5.111011111561101E-5
BigDecimal                    : 56789.012345 / 1111111111 = 0.0000511101111156110
Double                        : 56789.012345 / 1111111111 = 0.0000511101111156110

Precision 16
------------------------------------------------------
BigDecimalNoRound             : 56789.012345 / 1111111111 = Non-terminating decimal expansion; no exact representable decimal result.
DoubleNoRound                 : 56789.012345 / 1111111111 = 5.111011111561101E-5
BigDecimal                    : 56789.012345 / 1111111111 = 0.00005111011111561101
Double                        : 56789.012345 / 1111111111 = 0.00005111011111561101

Precision 17
------------------------------------------------------
BigDecimalNoRound             : 56789.012345 / 1111111111 = Non-terminating decimal expansion; no exact representable decimal result.
DoubleNoRound                 : 56789.012345 / 1111111111 = 5.111011111561101E-5
BigDecimal                    : 56789.012345 / 1111111111 = 0.000051110111115611011
Double                        : 56789.012345 / 1111111111 = 0.000051110111115611013

Precision 18
------------------------------------------------------
BigDecimalNoRound             : 56789.012345 / 1111111111 = Non-terminating decimal expansion; no exact representable decimal result.
DoubleNoRound                 : 56789.012345 / 1111111111 = 5.111011111561101E-5
BigDecimal                    : 56789.012345 / 1111111111 = 0.0000511101111156110111
Double                        : 56789.012345 / 1111111111 = 0.0000511101111156110125

Precision 19
------------------------------------------------------
BigDecimalNoRound             : 56789.012345 / 1111111111 = Non-terminating decimal expansion; no exact representable decimal result.
DoubleNoRound                 : 56789.012345 / 1111111111 = 5.111011111561101E-5
BigDecimal                    : 56789.012345 / 1111111111 = 0.00005111011111561101111
Double                        : 56789.012345 / 1111111111 = 0.00005111011111561101252

import java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException;
import java.lang.reflect.Method;
import java.math.BigDecimal;
import java.math.MathContext;

public class Exercise {
    public static void main(String[] args) throws IllegalArgumentException,
            SecurityException, IllegalAccessException,
            InvocationTargetException, NoSuchMethodException {
        String amount = "56789.012345";
        String quantity = "1111111111";
        int [] precisions = new int [] {14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19};
        for (int i = 0; i < precisions.length; i++) {
            int precision = precisions[i];
            System.out.println(String.format("Precision %d", precision));
            System.out.println("------------------------------------------------------");
            execute("BigDecimalNoRound", amount, quantity, precision);
            execute("DoubleNoRound", amount, quantity, precision);
            execute("BigDecimal", amount, quantity, precision);
            execute("Double", amount, quantity, precision);
            System.out.println();
        }
    }

    private static void execute(String test, String amount, String quantity,
            int precision) throws IllegalArgumentException, SecurityException,
            IllegalAccessException, InvocationTargetException,
            NoSuchMethodException {
        Method impl = Exercise.class.getMethod("divideUsing" + test, String.class,
                String.class, int.class);
        String price;
        try {
            price = (String) impl.invoke(null, amount, quantity, precision);
        } catch (InvocationTargetException e) {
            price = e.getTargetException().getMessage();
        }
        System.out.println(String.format("%-30s: %s / %s = %s", test, amount,
                quantity, price));
    }

    public static String divideUsingDoubleNoRound(String amount,
            String quantity, int precision) {
        // acceptance
        double amount0 = Double.parseDouble(amount);
        double quantity0 = Double.parseDouble(quantity);

        //calculation
        double price0 = amount0 / quantity0;

        // presentation
        String price = Double.toString(price0);
        return price;
    }

    public static String divideUsingDouble(String amount, String quantity,
            int precision) {
        // acceptance
        double amount0 = Double.parseDouble(amount);
        double quantity0 = Double.parseDouble(quantity);

        //calculation
        double price0 = amount0 / quantity0;

        // presentation
        MathContext precision0 = new MathContext(precision);
        String price = new BigDecimal(price0, precision0)
                .toString();
        return price;
    }

    public static String divideUsingBigDecimal(String amount, String quantity,
            int precision) {
        // acceptance
        BigDecimal amount0 = new BigDecimal(amount);
        BigDecimal quantity0 = new BigDecimal(quantity);
        MathContext precision0 = new MathContext(precision);

        //calculation
        BigDecimal price0 = amount0.divide(quantity0, precision0);

        // presentation
        String price = price0.toString();
        return price;
    }

    public static String divideUsingBigDecimalNoRound(String amount, String quantity,
            int precision) {
        // acceptance
        BigDecimal amount0 = new BigDecimal(amount);
        BigDecimal quantity0 = new BigDecimal(quantity);

        //calculation
        BigDecimal price0 = amount0.divide(quantity0);

        // presentation
        String price = price0.toString();
        return price;
    }
}

大多数回答都强调了为什么不应该使用替身来计算金钱和货币。我完全同意他们的观点。

但这并不是说，double永远不能用于这个目的。

我曾经参与过许多gc需求非常低的项目，BigDecimal对象是造成这种开销的一个重要因素。

正是由于缺乏对双重表示的理解，以及缺乏处理准确性和精确性的经验，才产生了这个明智的建议。

如果您能够处理项目的精度和准确性要求，则可以使其工作，这必须基于处理的双精度值的范围来完成。

你可以参考番石榴的FuzzyCompare方法来获得更多的信息。参数公差是关键。 我们为一个证券交易应用程序处理了这个问题，并对在不同范围内对不同数值使用什么公差做了详尽的研究。

此外，在某些情况下，您可能会试图使用Double包装器作为映射键，并将哈希映射作为实现。这是非常危险的，因为双重。等号和哈希码，例如值“0.5”和“0.6 - 0.1”将导致一个大混乱。

这不是精确与否的问题，也不是精确与否的问题。这是一个满足以10为底而不是以2为底计算的人的期望的问题。例如，在财务计算中使用双精度值不会产生数学意义上的“错误”答案，但它可以产生财务意义上不期望的答案。

即使您在输出前的最后一分钟舍入结果，您仍然可以偶尔使用与期望不匹配的双精度结果。

Using a calculator, or calculating results by hand, 1.40 * 165 = 231 exactly. However, internally using doubles, on my compiler / operating system environment, it is stored as a binary number close to 230.99999... so if you truncate the number, you get 230 instead of 231. You may reason that rounding instead of truncating would have given the desired result of 231. That is true, but rounding always involves truncation. Whatever rounding technique you use, there are still boundary conditions like this one that will round down when you expect it to round up. They are rare enough that they often will not be found through casual testing or observation. You may have to write some code to search for examples that illustrate outcomes that do not behave as expected.

Assume you want to round something to the nearest penny. So you take your final result, multiply by 100, add 0.5, truncate, then divide the result by 100 to get back to pennies. If the internal number you stored was 3.46499999.... instead of 3.465, you are going to get 3.46 instead 3.47 when you round the number to the nearest penny. But your base 10 calculations may have indicated that the answer should be 3.465 exactly, which clearly should round up to 3.47, not down to 3.46. These kinds of things happen occasionally in real life when you use doubles for financial calculations. It is rare, so it often goes unnoticed as an issue, but it happens.

如果您使用以10为基数进行内部计算，而不是使用双数，则如果您的代码中没有其他错误，那么结果总是完全符合人类的预期。