我如何知道是否在Bash中设置了变量?
例如,如何检查用户是否向函数提供了第一个参数?
function a {
# if $1 is set ?
}
我如何知道是否在Bash中设置了变量?
例如,如何检查用户是否向函数提供了第一个参数?
function a {
# if $1 is set ?
}
当前回答
要检查非空/非零字符串变量,即如果已设置,请使用
if [ -n "$1" ]
它与-z相反。我发现自己使用-n多于-z。
您可以像这样使用它:
if [ -n "$1" ]; then
echo "You supplied the first parameter!"
else
echo "First parameter not supplied."
fi
其他回答
在现代版本的Bash(我认为是4.2或更高版本;我不确定)上,我会这样做:
if [ ! -v SOMEVARIABLE ] #note the lack of a $ sigil
then
echo "Variable is unset"
elif [ -z "$SOMEVARIABLE" ]
then
echo "Variable is set to an empty string"
else
echo "Variable is set to some string"
fi
要检查是否设置了变量,请执行以下操作:
var=""; [[ $var ]] && echo "set" || echo "not set"
如果您希望测试变量是否绑定或未绑定,即使在启用了nounset选项后,这也能很好地工作:
set -o noun set
if printenv variableName >/dev/null; then
# variable is bound to a value
else
# variable is unbound
fi
虽然这里所述的大多数技术都是正确的,但Bash 4.2支持对变量的存在进行实际测试(man-Bash),而不是测试变量的值。
[[ -v foo ]]; echo $?
# 1
foo=bar
[[ -v foo ]]; echo $?
# 0
foo=""
[[ -v foo ]]; echo $?
# 0
值得注意的是,与许多其他方法(如使用[-z)不同,这种方法在set-u/set-o nounset模式下用于检查未设置的变量时不会导致错误。
我很惊讶没有人尝试编写一个shell脚本来以编程方式生成这个臭名昭著的难以摸索的表。既然我们在这里试图学习编码技术,为什么不用代码表达答案?:)这是我的看法(应该在任何POSIX shell中都适用):
H="+-%s-+-%s----+-%s----+-%s--+\n" # table divider printf format
R="| %-10s | %-10s | %-10s | %-10s |\n" # table row printf format
S='V' # S is a variable that is set-and-not-null
N='' # N is a variable that is set-but-null (empty "")
unset U # U is a variable that is unset
printf "$H" "----------" "-------" "-------" "---------";
printf "$R" "expression" "FOO='V'" "FOO='' " "unset FOO";
printf "$H" "----------" "-------" "-------" "---------";
printf "$R" "\${FOO:-x}" "${S:-x}" "${N:-x}" "${U:-x} "; S='V';N='';unset U
printf "$R" "\${FOO-x} " "${S-x} " "${N-x} " "${U-x} "; S='V';N='';unset U
printf "$R" "\${FOO:=x}" "${S:=x}" "${N:=x}" "${U:=x} "; S='V';N='';unset U
printf "$R" "\${FOO=x} " "${S=x} " "${N=x} " "${U=x} "; S='V';N='';unset U
# "${N:?x}" "${U:?x} "
printf "$R" "\${FOO:?x}" "${S:?x}" "<error>" "<error> "; S='V';N='';unset U
# "${U?x} "
printf "$R" "\${FOO?x} " "${S?x} " "${N?x} " "<error> "; S='V';N='';unset U
printf "$R" "\${FOO:+x}" "${S:+x}" "${N:+x}" "${U:+x} "; S='V';N='';unset U
printf "$R" "\${FOO+x} " "${S+x} " "${N+x} " "${U+x} "; S='V';N='';unset U
printf "$H" "----------" "-------" "-------" "---------";
以及运行脚本的输出:
+------------+------------+------------+------------+
| expression | FOO='V' | FOO='' | unset FOO |
+------------+------------+------------+------------+
| ${FOO:-x} | V | x | x |
| ${FOO-x} | V | | x |
| ${FOO:=x} | V | x | x |
| ${FOO=x} | V | | x |
| ${FOO:?x} | V | <error> | <error> |
| ${FOO?x} | V | | <error> |
| ${FOO:+x} | x | | |
| ${FOO+x} | x | x | |
+------------+------------+------------+------------+
该脚本缺少了一些功能,比如在发生(或不发生)副作用分配时显示,但也许其他更有野心的人希望以此为出发点,并以此为出发。