这里有人在sql 2011中讲述了这个功能，令人遗憾的是，他们选择了一个有点不同的关键字“OFFSET / FETCH”，但它不是标准的，然后ok。

对我来说，一起使用OFFSET和FETCH很慢，所以我使用了TOP和OFFSET的组合，就像这样(这更快):

SELECT TOP 20 * FROM (SELECT columname1, columname2 FROM tablename
    WHERE <conditions...> ORDER BY columname1 OFFSET 100 ROWS) aliasname

注意:如果在同一个查询中同时使用TOP和OFFSET:

SELECT TOP 20 columname1, columname2 FROM tablename
    WHERE <conditions...> ORDER BY columname1 OFFSET 100 ROWS

然后你会得到一个错误，所以为了同时使用TOP和OFFSET，你需要用子查询来分离它。

如果你需要使用SELECT DISTINCT，那么查询如下:

SELECT TOP 20 FROM (SELECT DISTINCT columname1, columname2
    WHERE <conditions...> ORDER BY columname1 OFFSET 100 ROWS) aliasname

注意:使用SELECT ROW_NUMBER和DISTINCT不适合我。

select top (@TakeCount) * --FETCH NEXT
from(
    Select  ROW_NUMBER() OVER (order by StartDate) AS rowid,*
    From YourTable
)A
where Rowid>@SkipCount --OFFSET

因为，我测试了更多次这个脚本更有用的100万条记录，每页100条记录分页工作更快，我的PC执行这个脚本0秒，而与mysql相比有自己的限制和偏移约4.5秒得到结果。

有些人可能不理解Row_Number()总是按特定字段排序。如果我们只需要按顺序定义行，应该使用:

Row_number () over (order by (select null))

SELECT TOP {LIMIT} * FROM (
      SELECT TOP {LIMIT} + {OFFSET} ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY (SELECT NULL)) AS ROW_NO,*
      FROM  {TABLE_NAME}
) XX WHERE ROW_NO > {OFFSET}

解释:

{LIMIT}:每页的记录数 {OFFSET}:跳过记录的个数

我假设，在c#表达式/LINQ语句的跳过和采取生成下面的SQL命令

DECLARE @p0 Int = 1
DECLARE @p1 Int = 3
SELECT [t1].[Id]
FROM (
    SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY [t0].[Id]
    FROM [ShoppingCart] AS [t0]
    ) AS [t1]
WHERE [t1].[ROW_NUMBER] BETWEEN @p0 + 1 AND @p0 + @p1
ORDER BY [t1].[ROW_NUMBER]

另一个例子:

declare @limit int 
declare @offset int 
set @offset = 2;
set @limit = 20;
declare @count int
declare @idxini int 
declare @idxfim int 
select @idxfim = @offset * @limit
select @idxini = @idxfim - (@limit-1);
WITH paging AS
    (
        SELECT 
             ROW_NUMBER() OVER (order by object_id) AS rowid, *
        FROM 
            sys.objects 
    )
select *
    from 
        (select COUNT(1) as rowqtd from paging) qtd, 
            paging 
    where 
        rowid between @idxini and @idxfim
    order by 
        rowid;