我正在寻找一种方法,通过它们的类型在窗口上找到所有控件,
例如:找到所有的文本框,找到所有实现特定界面的控件等。
我正在寻找一种方法,通过它们的类型在窗口上找到所有控件,
例如:找到所有的文本框,找到所有实现特定界面的控件等。
当前回答
我根据@Mathias Lykkegaard Lorenzen的建议改编了@Bryce Kahle的回答,并使用了LogicalTreeHelper。
看起来还行。;)
public static IEnumerable<T> FindLogicalChildren<T> ( DependencyObject depObj ) where T : DependencyObject
{
if( depObj != null )
{
foreach( object rawChild in LogicalTreeHelper.GetChildren( depObj ) )
{
if( rawChild is DependencyObject )
{
DependencyObject child = (DependencyObject)rawChild;
if( child is T )
{
yield return (T)child;
}
foreach( T childOfChild in FindLogicalChildren<T>( child ) )
{
yield return childOfChild;
}
}
}
}
}
(它仍然不会检查@Benjamin Berry和@David R分别提到的组框中的选项卡控件或网格。) (也遵循@noonand的建议&删除多余的子!= null)
其他回答
对递归做了一点小小的改变,例如,你可以找到一个标签控件的子标签控件。
public static DependencyObject FindInVisualTreeDown(DependencyObject obj, Type type)
{
if (obj != null)
{
for (int i = 0; i < VisualTreeHelper.GetChildrenCount(obj); i++)
{
DependencyObject child = VisualTreeHelper.GetChild(obj, i);
if (child.GetType() == type)
{
return child;
}
DependencyObject childReturn = FindInVisualTreeDown(child, type);
if (childReturn != null)
{
return childReturn;
}
}
}
return null;
}
I found that the line, VisualTreeHelper.GetChildrenCount(depObj);, used in several examples above does not return a non-zero count for GroupBoxes, in particular, where the GroupBox contains a Grid, and the Grid contains children elements. I believe this may be because the GroupBox is not allowed to contain more than one child, and this is stored in its Content property. There is no GroupBox.Children type of property. I am sure I did not do this very efficiently, but I modified the first "FindVisualChildren" example in this chain as follows:
public IEnumerable<T> FindVisualChildren<T>(DependencyObject depObj) where T : DependencyObject
{
if (depObj != null)
{
int depObjCount = VisualTreeHelper.GetChildrenCount(depObj);
for (int i = 0; i <depObjCount; i++)
{
DependencyObject child = VisualTreeHelper.GetChild(depObj, i);
if (child != null && child is T)
{
yield return (T)child;
}
if (child is GroupBox)
{
GroupBox gb = child as GroupBox;
Object gpchild = gb.Content;
if (gpchild is T)
{
yield return (T)child;
child = gpchild as T;
}
}
foreach (T childOfChild in FindVisualChildren<T>(child))
{
yield return childOfChild;
}
}
}
}
对于这个和更多的用例,你可以添加流动扩展方法到你的库:
public static List<DependencyObject> FindAllChildren(this DependencyObject dpo, Predicate<DependencyObject> predicate)
{
var results = new List<DependencyObject>();
if (predicate == null)
return results;
for (int i = 0; i < VisualTreeHelper.GetChildrenCount(dpo); i++)
{
var child = VisualTreeHelper.GetChild(dpo, i);
if (predicate(child))
results.Add(child);
var subChildren = child.FindAllChildren(predicate);
results.AddRange(subChildren);
}
return results;
}
举个例子:
var children = dpObject.FindAllChildren(child => child is TextBox);
I wanted to add a comment but I have less than 50 pts so I can only "Answer". Be aware that if you use the "VisualTreeHelper" method to retrieve XAML "TextBlock" objects then it will also grab XAML "Button" objects. If you re-initialize the "TextBlock" object by writing to the Textblock.Text parameter then you will no longer be able to change the Button text using the Button.Content parameter. The Button will permanently show the text written to it from the Textblock.Text write action (from when it was retrieved --
foreach (TextBlock tb in FindVisualChildren<TextBlock>(window))
{
// do something with tb here
tb.Text = ""; //this will overwrite Button.Content and render the
//Button.Content{set} permanently disabled.
}
要解决这个问题,您可以尝试使用XAML“文本框”并添加方法(或事件)来模拟XAMAL按钮。XAML“TextBox”不是通过搜索“TextBlock”收集的。
我根据@Mathias Lykkegaard Lorenzen的建议改编了@Bryce Kahle的回答,并使用了LogicalTreeHelper。
看起来还行。;)
public static IEnumerable<T> FindLogicalChildren<T> ( DependencyObject depObj ) where T : DependencyObject
{
if( depObj != null )
{
foreach( object rawChild in LogicalTreeHelper.GetChildren( depObj ) )
{
if( rawChild is DependencyObject )
{
DependencyObject child = (DependencyObject)rawChild;
if( child is T )
{
yield return (T)child;
}
foreach( T childOfChild in FindLogicalChildren<T>( child ) )
{
yield return childOfChild;
}
}
}
}
}
(它仍然不会检查@Benjamin Berry和@David R分别提到的组框中的选项卡控件或网格。) (也遵循@noonand的建议&删除多余的子!= null)